积极监测前列腺癌的男性及其重要他人的经历:定性综述

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Psycho‐Oncology Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1002/pon.6324
Stephanie Hughes, Hazel Everitt, Beth Stuart, Rebecca Band
{"title":"积极监测前列腺癌的男性及其重要他人的经历:定性综述","authors":"Stephanie Hughes, Hazel Everitt, Beth Stuart, Rebecca Band","doi":"10.1002/pon.6324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is a monitoring pathway for men with low‐grade, slow growing PCa and aims to delay or avoid active treatment by treating only in the case of disease progression. Experiences of this pathway vary but living with an untreated cancer can have a negative psychological impact on both the patient and their significant other (SO). Literature suggests partners are the primary source of support for men on AS, and therefore it is important to consider SO experiences alongside those of the patient. To the best of our knowledge this is the first UK‐based qualitative review looking specifically at experiences of AS for both men with PCa and their SOs.MethodsMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched for literature reporting qualitative experiences of AS for PCa for either men on AS or SOs (or both). 2769 records were identified and screened, with 28 meeting the eligibility criteria. Qualitative data were synthesised and included men on AS (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 428), and SOs (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 51).ResultsExperiences of the AS pathway vary but reports of uncertainty and anxiety were present in the accounts of both men on AS and SOs. SOs are intertwined throughout every part of the PCa journey, and couples presented as a unit that were on AS together. Both patients and SOs expressed a need for more support, and highly valued peer support. Despite this finding, men expressed a dislike towards ‘support groups’.ConclusionsIncreased recognition in clinical practice of SO involvement in AS is needed. Further research is required to explore the specific types of support that would be most acceptable to this population to address the unmet support needs uncovered in this review.","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The experiences of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and their significant others: A qualitative synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Hughes, Hazel Everitt, Beth Stuart, Rebecca Band\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.6324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is a monitoring pathway for men with low‐grade, slow growing PCa and aims to delay or avoid active treatment by treating only in the case of disease progression. Experiences of this pathway vary but living with an untreated cancer can have a negative psychological impact on both the patient and their significant other (SO). Literature suggests partners are the primary source of support for men on AS, and therefore it is important to consider SO experiences alongside those of the patient. To the best of our knowledge this is the first UK‐based qualitative review looking specifically at experiences of AS for both men with PCa and their SOs.MethodsMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched for literature reporting qualitative experiences of AS for PCa for either men on AS or SOs (or both). 2769 records were identified and screened, with 28 meeting the eligibility criteria. Qualitative data were synthesised and included men on AS (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 428), and SOs (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 51).ResultsExperiences of the AS pathway vary but reports of uncertainty and anxiety were present in the accounts of both men on AS and SOs. SOs are intertwined throughout every part of the PCa journey, and couples presented as a unit that were on AS together. Both patients and SOs expressed a need for more support, and highly valued peer support. Despite this finding, men expressed a dislike towards ‘support groups’.ConclusionsIncreased recognition in clinical practice of SO involvement in AS is needed. Further research is required to explore the specific types of support that would be most acceptable to this population to address the unmet support needs uncovered in this review.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6324\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景前列腺癌(PCa)的主动监测(AS)是一种针对低级别、生长缓慢的 PCa 男性患者的监测方法,其目的是推迟或避免主动治疗,只在疾病进展时才进行治疗。患者对这种治疗方法的体验各不相同,但癌症未得到治疗会给患者及其重要伴侣(SO)带来负面的心理影响。文献表明,伴侣是男性 AS 患者的主要支持来源,因此在考虑患者经历的同时,也要考虑伴侣的经历。据我们所知,这是英国第一份专门研究男性 PCa 患者及其配偶在 AS 方面经历的定性综述。研究方法:我们检索了MEDLINE (Ovid)、EMBASE、PsychINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane Library 中有关报道男性 PCa 患者或配偶(或两者)在 AS 方面经历的定性文献。共找到并筛选出 2769 条记录,其中 28 条符合资格标准。对定性数据进行了综合,包括接受AS治疗的男性(n = 428)和接受SO治疗的男性(n = 51)。结果接受AS治疗的男性和接受SO治疗的男性对AS治疗过程的体验各不相同,但都有不确定性和焦虑的报告。SO在PCa治疗过程中的每一个环节都相互交织,夫妇作为一个整体共同接受AS治疗。患者和辅助人员都表示需要更多的支持,并高度评价同伴支持。尽管有这一发现,但男性对 "支持小组 "表示反感。需要进一步开展研究,探索最能为这一人群所接受的特定类型的支持,以解决本综述中发现的尚未得到满足的支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The experiences of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer and their significant others: A qualitative synthesis
BackgroundActive surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PCa) is a monitoring pathway for men with low‐grade, slow growing PCa and aims to delay or avoid active treatment by treating only in the case of disease progression. Experiences of this pathway vary but living with an untreated cancer can have a negative psychological impact on both the patient and their significant other (SO). Literature suggests partners are the primary source of support for men on AS, and therefore it is important to consider SO experiences alongside those of the patient. To the best of our knowledge this is the first UK‐based qualitative review looking specifically at experiences of AS for both men with PCa and their SOs.MethodsMEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched for literature reporting qualitative experiences of AS for PCa for either men on AS or SOs (or both). 2769 records were identified and screened, with 28 meeting the eligibility criteria. Qualitative data were synthesised and included men on AS (n = 428), and SOs (n = 51).ResultsExperiences of the AS pathway vary but reports of uncertainty and anxiety were present in the accounts of both men on AS and SOs. SOs are intertwined throughout every part of the PCa journey, and couples presented as a unit that were on AS together. Both patients and SOs expressed a need for more support, and highly valued peer support. Despite this finding, men expressed a dislike towards ‘support groups’.ConclusionsIncreased recognition in clinical practice of SO involvement in AS is needed. Further research is required to explore the specific types of support that would be most acceptable to this population to address the unmet support needs uncovered in this review.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信