吉西他滨联合纳布-紫杉醇对恶性腹水胰腺癌患者的治疗效果

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kanae Inoue , Koh Fukushi , Shota Yamaguchi , Tomonao Taira , Taro Shibuki , Tomoyuki Satake , Kazuo Watanabe , Mitsuhito Sasaki , Hiroshi Imaoka , Shuichi Mitsunaga , Masafumi Ikeda
{"title":"吉西他滨联合纳布-紫杉醇对恶性腹水胰腺癌患者的治疗效果","authors":"Kanae Inoue ,&nbsp;Koh Fukushi ,&nbsp;Shota Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Tomonao Taira ,&nbsp;Taro Shibuki ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Satake ,&nbsp;Kazuo Watanabe ,&nbsp;Mitsuhito Sasaki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Imaoka ,&nbsp;Shuichi Mitsunaga ,&nbsp;Masafumi Ikeda","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites\",\"authors\":\"Kanae Inoue ,&nbsp;Koh Fukushi ,&nbsp;Shota Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Tomonao Taira ,&nbsp;Taro Shibuki ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Satake ,&nbsp;Kazuo Watanabe ,&nbsp;Mitsuhito Sasaki ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Imaoka ,&nbsp;Shuichi Mitsunaga ,&nbsp;Masafumi Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000772\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吉西他滨+纳布-紫杉醇(GnP)疗法已被证明可改善转移性胰腺癌(PC)患者的预后;然而,GnP对伴有恶性腹水(MA)的PC患者的疗效和安全性仍然未知。我们对2015年3月至2021年8月期间在我院接受GnP一线化疗的腹膜播散PC患者进行了回顾性调查。我们回顾了以下患者数据:患者特征、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观反应率(ORR)、不良事件(AE)和相对剂量强度(RDI)。MA的严重程度根据CT结果分为1级(小)、2级(中)和3级(大)。研究共纳入了 189 名患者,并对各腹水等级患者和 41 名无 MA 患者的研究终点进行了比较。85 名患者的腹水分为 1 级,41 名患者为 2 级,22 名患者为 3 级。在有腹水的患者中,中位OS、PFS和ORR分别为11.2个月、5.7个月和24.3%。随着 MA 严重程度的增加,OS 和 PFS 均有所下降;尤其是 2 级和 3 级患者的预后较差。除厌食外,其他AEs和RDI均无差异。GnP 对患有 MA 的 PC 患者显示出中等程度的疗效和可控的安全性。然而,中度至大量腹水的 PC 患者预后仍然很差,因此需要进一步开发有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment outcomes of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer patients with malignant ascites

Background

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy has been shown to improve the prognosis in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC); however, the efficacy and safety of GnP in PC patients with malignant ascites (MA) remains unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated PC patients with peritoneal dissemination who had received GnP as first-line chemotherapy at our institution between March 2015 and August 2021. The following patient data were reviewed: patient characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), and relative dose intensity (RDI). The severity of MA was categorized based on the CT findings as grade 1 (small), grade 2 (moderate), or grade 3 (massive).

Results

A total of 189 patients were included; the study endpoints were compared between patients with each ascites grade and 41 patients without MA. The MA was classified as grade 1 in 85 patients, grade 2 in 41 patients, and grade 3 in 22 patients. In the patients with MA, the median OS, PFS and ORR were 11.2 months, 5.7 months and 24.3%, respectively. The OS and PFS decreased with increasing the severity of MA; in particular, patients with grade 2 and 3 showed a poorer prognosis. There were no differences in AEs, except for anorexia, or the RDI according to the severity of MA.

Conclusion

GnP showed moderate efficacy with manageable safety profile in PC patients with MA. However, PC patients with moderate to massive ascites still have a dismal prognosis, and further development of effective treatments is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信