Cheng-Yu Tang , Shih-Hung Yang , Chung-Pin Li , Yung-Yeh Su , Sz-Chi Chiu , Li-Yuan Bai , Yan-Shen Shan , Li-Tzong Chen , Shih-Chang Chuang , De-Chuan Chan , Chia-Jui Yen , Cheng-Ming Peng , Tai-Jan Chiu , Yen-Yang Chen , Jen-Shi Chen , Nai-Jung Chiang , Wen-Chi Chou
{"title":"曾接受过 S-1 治疗对转移性胰腺癌患者接受脂质体伊立替康+5-氟尿嘧啶和亮菌甲素治疗疗效的影响","authors":"Cheng-Yu Tang , Shih-Hung Yang , Chung-Pin Li , Yung-Yeh Su , Sz-Chi Chiu , Li-Yuan Bai , Yan-Shen Shan , Li-Tzong Chen , Shih-Chang Chuang , De-Chuan Chan , Chia-Jui Yen , Cheng-Ming Peng , Tai-Jan Chiu , Yen-Yang Chen , Jen-Shi Chen , Nai-Jung Chiang , Wen-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><p>Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, <em>p</em> < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, <em>p</em> = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, <em>p</em> = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Yu Tang , Shih-Hung Yang , Chung-Pin Li , Yung-Yeh Su , Sz-Chi Chiu , Li-Yuan Bai , Yan-Shen Shan , Li-Tzong Chen , Shih-Chang Chuang , De-Chuan Chan , Chia-Jui Yen , Cheng-Ming Peng , Tai-Jan Chiu , Yen-Yang Chen , Jen-Shi Chen , Nai-Jung Chiang , Wen-Chi Chou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><p>Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, <em>p</em> < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, <em>p</em> = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, <em>p</em> = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pancreatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pancreatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000760\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Background/objectives
Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.
Methods
In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.
Results
The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.
期刊介绍:
Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.