在估算枪支政策影响的研究中报告和描述研究方法。

IF 4.7 2区医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1097/ede.0000000000001741

Camerin A Rencken, Julia P Schleimer, Matthew Miller, Sonja A Swanson, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar

{"title":"在估算枪支政策影响的研究中报告和描述研究方法。","authors":"Camerin A Rencken, Julia P Schleimer, Matthew Miller, Sonja A Swanson, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar","doi":"10.1097/ede.0000000000001741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence about which firearm policies work, to what extent, and for whom is hotly debated, perhaps partly because variation in research methodology has produced mixed and inconclusive effect estimates. We conducted a scoping review of firearm policy research in the health sciences in the United States, focusing on methodological considerations for causal inference.","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting and Description of Research Methodology in Studies Estimating Effects of Firearm Policies.\",\"authors\":\"Camerin A Rencken, Julia P Schleimer, Matthew Miller, Sonja A Swanson, Ali Rowhani-Rahbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ede.0000000000001741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence about which firearm policies work, to what extent, and for whom is hotly debated, perhaps partly because variation in research methodology has produced mixed and inconclusive effect estimates. We conducted a scoping review of firearm policy research in the health sciences in the United States, focusing on methodological considerations for causal inference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001741\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于哪些枪支政策有效、在多大程度上有效以及对谁有效的证据引起了激烈的争论，部分原因可能是研究方法的不同导致了效果评估的混杂和不确定。我们对美国健康科学领域的枪支政策研究进行了一次范围界定审查，重点关注因果推断的方法论因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reporting and Description of Research Methodology in Studies Estimating Effects of Firearm Policies.

Evidence about which firearm policies work, to what extent, and for whom is hotly debated, perhaps partly because variation in research methodology has produced mixed and inconclusive effect estimates. We conducted a scoping review of firearm policy research in the health sciences in the United States, focusing on methodological considerations for causal inference.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

3.70%

发文量

177

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.