{"title":"在官僚问责到期时推卸责任?管理严重安全事故的证据","authors":"Su Su, Rui Wang","doi":"10.1080/15309576.2024.2335298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When bureaucrats are up to answer for governance accidents, shirking could be a “less harm” strategy to ward off bureaucratic accountability. This study searches for evidence of shirking behaviors ...","PeriodicalId":47571,"journal":{"name":"Public Performance & Management Review","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shirking When Bureaucratic Accountability Is Due? Evidence from Managing Severe Safety Accidents\",\"authors\":\"Su Su, Rui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15309576.2024.2335298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When bureaucrats are up to answer for governance accidents, shirking could be a “less harm” strategy to ward off bureaucratic accountability. This study searches for evidence of shirking behaviors ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Performance & Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2335298\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Performance & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2335298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shirking When Bureaucratic Accountability Is Due? Evidence from Managing Severe Safety Accidents
When bureaucrats are up to answer for governance accidents, shirking could be a “less harm” strategy to ward off bureaucratic accountability. This study searches for evidence of shirking behaviors ...
期刊介绍:
Public Performance & Management Review (PPMR) is a leading peer-reviewed academic journal that addresses a broad array of influential factors on the performance of public and nonprofit organizations. Its objectives are to: Advance theories on public governance, public management, and public performance; Facilitate the development of innovative techniques and to encourage a wider application of those already established; Stimulate research and critical thinking about the relationship between public and private management theories; Present integrated analyses of theories, concepts, strategies, and techniques dealing with performance, measurement, and related questions of organizational efficacy; and Provide a forum for practitioner-academic exchange. Continuing themes include, but are not limited to: managing for results, measuring and evaluating performance, designing accountability systems, improving budget strategies, managing human resources, building partnerships, facilitating citizen participation, applying new technologies, and improving public sector services and outcomes. Published since 1975, Public Performance & Management Review is a highly respected journal, receiving international ranking. Scholars and practitioners recognize it as a leading journal in the field of public administration.