Malachi Noel, Jason J. Wang, Bruce Macintosh, Katie Crotts, Christian Marois, Eric L. Nielsen, Robert J. De Rosa, Katie Scalzo, Kent Wallace
{"title":"分析双子座行星成像仪的大气色散校正:超出设计要求的残余色散","authors":"Malachi Noel, Jason J. Wang, Bruce Macintosh, Katie Crotts, Christian Marois, Eric L. Nielsen, Robert J. De Rosa, Katie Scalzo, Kent Wallace","doi":"10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) corrects the chromatic dispersion caused by differential atmospheric refraction (DAR), making it an important optic for exoplanet observation. Despite requiring <5 mas of residual DAR to avoid potentially affecting the coronagraph, the GPI ADC averages ∼7 and ∼11 mas of residual DAR in H and J band, respectively. We analyzed GPI data in those bands to find explanations for the underperformance. We found the model GPI uses to predict DAR underestimates humidity’s impact on incident DAR, causing on average a 0.54 mas increase in H band residual DAR. Additionally, the GPI ADC consistently undercorrects in H band by about 7 mas, causing almost all the H band residual DAR. J band does not have such an offset. Perpendicular dispersion induced by the GPI ADC, potentially from a misalignment in the prisms’ relative orientation, causes 86% of the residual DAR in J band. Correcting these issues could reduce residual DAR, thereby improving exoplanet detection. We also made an approximation for the index of refraction of air from 0.7 to 1.36 microns that more accurately accounts for the effects of humidity.","PeriodicalId":54342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the atmospheric dispersion correction of the Gemini Planet Imager: residual dispersion above design requirements\",\"authors\":\"Malachi Noel, Jason J. Wang, Bruce Macintosh, Katie Crotts, Christian Marois, Eric L. Nielsen, Robert J. De Rosa, Katie Scalzo, Kent Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) corrects the chromatic dispersion caused by differential atmospheric refraction (DAR), making it an important optic for exoplanet observation. Despite requiring <5 mas of residual DAR to avoid potentially affecting the coronagraph, the GPI ADC averages ∼7 and ∼11 mas of residual DAR in H and J band, respectively. We analyzed GPI data in those bands to find explanations for the underperformance. We found the model GPI uses to predict DAR underestimates humidity’s impact on incident DAR, causing on average a 0.54 mas increase in H band residual DAR. Additionally, the GPI ADC consistently undercorrects in H band by about 7 mas, causing almost all the H band residual DAR. J band does not have such an offset. Perpendicular dispersion induced by the GPI ADC, potentially from a misalignment in the prisms’ relative orientation, causes 86% of the residual DAR in J band. Correcting these issues could reduce residual DAR, thereby improving exoplanet detection. We also made an approximation for the index of refraction of air from 0.7 to 1.36 microns that more accurately accounts for the effects of humidity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
双子座行星成像仪(GPI)的大气色散校正器(ADC)可以校正由大气折射差(DAR)引起的色散,是观测系外行星的重要光学设备。尽管为了避免对日冕仪造成潜在影响,要求残余 DAR 小于 5mas,但 GPI ADC 在 H 波段和 J 波段的平均残余 DAR 分别为 7mas 和 11mas 。我们对这些波段的 GPI 数据进行了分析,以找出性能不佳的原因。我们发现,GPI用来预测DAR的模型低估了湿度对入射DAR的影响,导致H波段的残余DAR平均增加了0.54mas。此外,GPI ADC 在 H 波段的校正一直不足约 7mas,导致几乎所有 H 波段的残余 DAR。J 波段则没有这种偏移。GPI ADC 引起的垂直色散(可能是棱镜相对方向的偏差)造成了 J 波段 86% 的残余 DAR。纠正这些问题可以减少残余 DAR,从而改进系外行星探测。我们还对 0.7 至 1.36 微米的空气折射率进行了近似,以更准确地考虑湿度的影响。
Analyzing the atmospheric dispersion correction of the Gemini Planet Imager: residual dispersion above design requirements
The atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) corrects the chromatic dispersion caused by differential atmospheric refraction (DAR), making it an important optic for exoplanet observation. Despite requiring <5 mas of residual DAR to avoid potentially affecting the coronagraph, the GPI ADC averages ∼7 and ∼11 mas of residual DAR in H and J band, respectively. We analyzed GPI data in those bands to find explanations for the underperformance. We found the model GPI uses to predict DAR underestimates humidity’s impact on incident DAR, causing on average a 0.54 mas increase in H band residual DAR. Additionally, the GPI ADC consistently undercorrects in H band by about 7 mas, causing almost all the H band residual DAR. J band does not have such an offset. Perpendicular dispersion induced by the GPI ADC, potentially from a misalignment in the prisms’ relative orientation, causes 86% of the residual DAR in J band. Correcting these issues could reduce residual DAR, thereby improving exoplanet detection. We also made an approximation for the index of refraction of air from 0.7 to 1.36 microns that more accurately accounts for the effects of humidity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems publishes peer-reviewed papers reporting on original research in the development, testing, and application of telescopes, instrumentation, techniques, and systems for ground- and space-based astronomy.