对采用最佳实践改进流程的实证分析:中风护理最佳实践研究

IF 6.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Brandon Lee, Lawrence Fredendall, Aleda Roth, Shannon Sternberg, Bernardo F. Quiroga
{"title":"对采用最佳实践改进流程的实证分析:中风护理最佳实践研究","authors":"Brandon Lee,&nbsp;Lawrence Fredendall,&nbsp;Aleda Roth,&nbsp;Shannon Sternberg,&nbsp;Bernardo F. Quiroga","doi":"10.1002/joom.1301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study empirically examines how induced learning through adopting a set of best practices and learning-by-doing improved a hospital's care of ischemic stroke patients using ad hoc teams. While previous studies in healthcare operations management conducted in ad hoc team environments predominantly focused on volume-based learning (learning by doing, team familiarity via interactions among team members), our study focuses on induced learning in ad hoc teams through best practice adoptions. The analysis uses secondary data (Data period: January 2009–March 2017) about stroke patients from a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) in a U.S. tertiary teaching hospital as it adopted the U.S. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) <i>Target:Stroke</i> best practices. The ad hoc stroke teams provide the initial care and their performance is measured using “<i>Door-to-Needle (DTN)</i>” time and its sub-time segments. The <i>DTN</i> time is measured as the time elapsed between the stroke patient's arrival at the hospital's emergency department (ED) and the appropriate infusion of “<i>Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA)</i>” (i.e., a thrombolytic medication informally referred to as a “clot buster”). We found that adopting these best practices improved ischemic stroke care beyond improvement due to repetition. We also found that the neurologist's recent experience providing stroke care for the prior patient is positively associated with meeting the time performance goal for the current patient. This study provides insights into the use of management mechanisms to adopt and sustain best practices in healthcare that are generalizable to other organizations with ad hoc team environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51097,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operations Management","volume":"70 4","pages":"630-653"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1301","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical analysis of process improvement from best practice adoption: A study of stroke care best practices\",\"authors\":\"Brandon Lee,&nbsp;Lawrence Fredendall,&nbsp;Aleda Roth,&nbsp;Shannon Sternberg,&nbsp;Bernardo F. Quiroga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joom.1301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study empirically examines how induced learning through adopting a set of best practices and learning-by-doing improved a hospital's care of ischemic stroke patients using ad hoc teams. While previous studies in healthcare operations management conducted in ad hoc team environments predominantly focused on volume-based learning (learning by doing, team familiarity via interactions among team members), our study focuses on induced learning in ad hoc teams through best practice adoptions. The analysis uses secondary data (Data period: January 2009–March 2017) about stroke patients from a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) in a U.S. tertiary teaching hospital as it adopted the U.S. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) <i>Target:Stroke</i> best practices. The ad hoc stroke teams provide the initial care and their performance is measured using “<i>Door-to-Needle (DTN)</i>” time and its sub-time segments. The <i>DTN</i> time is measured as the time elapsed between the stroke patient's arrival at the hospital's emergency department (ED) and the appropriate infusion of “<i>Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA)</i>” (i.e., a thrombolytic medication informally referred to as a “clot buster”). We found that adopting these best practices improved ischemic stroke care beyond improvement due to repetition. We also found that the neurologist's recent experience providing stroke care for the prior patient is positively associated with meeting the time performance goal for the current patient. This study provides insights into the use of management mechanisms to adopt and sustain best practices in healthcare that are generalizable to other organizations with ad hoc team environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"630-653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joom.1301\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1301\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1301","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过实证研究,探讨了如何通过采用一套最佳实践和边做边学来提高医院对缺血性中风患者的护理水平。以往在特设团队环境下进行的医疗运营管理研究主要关注基于数量的学习(边做边学、通过团队成员之间的互动来熟悉团队),而我们的研究则侧重于通过采用最佳实践来诱导特设团队的学习。分析使用的是美国一家三级教学医院综合卒中中心(CSC)采用美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会(AHA/ASA)Target:Stroke 最佳实践时卒中患者的二手数据(数据时间:2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月)。特设卒中团队提供初始救治,其绩效通过 "门到针(DTN)"时间及其子时间段来衡量。DTN 时间是指从中风病人到达医院急诊科(ED)到适当输注 "组织浆蛋白酶原激活剂(TPA)"(即一种非正式称为 "血块克星 "的溶栓药物)之间的时间。我们发现,采用这些最佳实践改善了缺血性脑卒中护理,而不是因为重复而有所改善。我们还发现,神经科医生近期为之前患者提供中风护理的经验与当前患者达到时间绩效目标正相关。本研究为医疗保健领域采用和维持最佳实践的管理机制提供了启示,可推广到其他具有临时团队环境的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An empirical analysis of process improvement from best practice adoption: A study of stroke care best practices

An empirical analysis of process improvement from best practice adoption: A study of stroke care best practices

This study empirically examines how induced learning through adopting a set of best practices and learning-by-doing improved a hospital's care of ischemic stroke patients using ad hoc teams. While previous studies in healthcare operations management conducted in ad hoc team environments predominantly focused on volume-based learning (learning by doing, team familiarity via interactions among team members), our study focuses on induced learning in ad hoc teams through best practice adoptions. The analysis uses secondary data (Data period: January 2009–March 2017) about stroke patients from a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) in a U.S. tertiary teaching hospital as it adopted the U.S. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) Target:Stroke best practices. The ad hoc stroke teams provide the initial care and their performance is measured using “Door-to-Needle (DTN)” time and its sub-time segments. The DTN time is measured as the time elapsed between the stroke patient's arrival at the hospital's emergency department (ED) and the appropriate infusion of “Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA)” (i.e., a thrombolytic medication informally referred to as a “clot buster”). We found that adopting these best practices improved ischemic stroke care beyond improvement due to repetition. We also found that the neurologist's recent experience providing stroke care for the prior patient is positively associated with meeting the time performance goal for the current patient. This study provides insights into the use of management mechanisms to adopt and sustain best practices in healthcare that are generalizable to other organizations with ad hoc team environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Operations Management
Journal of Operations Management 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Operations Management (JOM) is a leading academic publication dedicated to advancing the field of operations management (OM) through rigorous and original research. The journal's primary audience is the academic community, although it also values contributions that attract the interest of practitioners. However, it does not publish articles that are primarily aimed at practitioners, as academic relevance is a fundamental requirement. JOM focuses on the management aspects of various types of operations, including manufacturing, service, and supply chain operations. The journal's scope is broad, covering both profit-oriented and non-profit organizations. The core criterion for publication is that the research question must be centered around operations management, rather than merely using operations as a context. For instance, a study on charismatic leadership in a manufacturing setting would only be within JOM's scope if it directly relates to the management of operations; the mere setting of the study is not enough. Published papers in JOM are expected to address real-world operational questions and challenges. While not all research must be driven by practical concerns, there must be a credible link to practice that is considered from the outset of the research, not as an afterthought. Authors are cautioned against assuming that academic knowledge can be easily translated into practical applications without proper justification. JOM's articles are abstracted and indexed by several prestigious databases and services, including Engineering Information, Inc.; Executive Sciences Institute; INSPEC; International Abstracts in Operations Research; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; SciSearch/Science Citation Index; CompuMath Citation Index; Current Contents/Engineering, Computing & Technology; Information Access Company; and Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's research is widely accessible and recognized within the academic and professional communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信