"使用这个词......是荒谬的"：洗脑 "标签如何威胁并支持问题少年产业

IF 0.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of American Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1017/s0021875824000112

MARK M. CHATFIELD

{"title":"\"使用这个词......是荒谬的\"：洗脑 \"标签如何威胁并支持问题少年产业","authors":"MARK M. CHATFIELD","doi":"10.1017/s0021875824000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>From the early 1960s to the early 1990s, a range of concerns about “brainwashing” in youth reeducation programs obfuscated professional and political discourse, influencing key outcomes that shaped the development of the troubled-teen industry in the United States. The most significant historical developments related to this controversy involved three different youth programs. In response to accusations of “brainwashing,” program executives created elaborate counterarguments and public-relations campaigns. Instead of working to address inherent risks associated with therapeutic reeducation, the brainwashing label obscured the potential for harm and enabled an unethical teen program industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of American Studies","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“To Use This Word … Would Be Absurd”: How the Brainwashing Label Threatened and Enabled the Troubled-Teen Industry\",\"authors\":\"MARK M. CHATFIELD\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0021875824000112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>From the early 1960s to the early 1990s, a range of concerns about “brainwashing” in youth reeducation programs obfuscated professional and political discourse, influencing key outcomes that shaped the development of the troubled-teen industry in the United States. The most significant historical developments related to this controversy involved three different youth programs. In response to accusations of “brainwashing,” program executives created elaborate counterarguments and public-relations campaigns. Instead of working to address inherent risks associated with therapeutic reeducation, the brainwashing label obscured the potential for harm and enabled an unethical teen program industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of American Studies\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021875824000112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021875824000112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

从 20 世纪 60 年代初到 20 世纪 90 年代初，一系列关于青少年再教育项目中 "洗脑 "的担忧混淆了专业和政治言论，影响了塑造美国问题青少年产业发展的关键结果。与这一争议有关的最重要的历史发展涉及三个不同的青少年项目。针对 "洗脑 "的指控，项目执行人员精心设计了反驳论据和公共关系活动。洗脑 "的标签非但没有解决与治疗性再教育相关的固有风险，反而掩盖了潜在的危害，使不道德的青少年项目产业得以发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“To Use This Word … Would Be Absurd”: How the Brainwashing Label Threatened and Enabled the Troubled-Teen Industry

From the early 1960s to the early 1990s, a range of concerns about “brainwashing” in youth reeducation programs obfuscated professional and political discourse, influencing key outcomes that shaped the development of the troubled-teen industry in the United States. The most significant historical developments related to this controversy involved three different youth programs. In response to accusations of “brainwashing,” program executives created elaborate counterarguments and public-relations campaigns. Instead of working to address inherent risks associated with therapeutic reeducation, the brainwashing label obscured the potential for harm and enabled an unethical teen program industry.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of American Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of American Studies seeks to critique and interrogate the notion of "America", pursuing this through international perspectives on the history, literature, politics and culture of the United States. The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed research and analysis by established and emerging scholars throughout the world, considering US history, politics, literature, institutions, economics, film, popular culture, geography, sociology and related subjects in domestic, continental, hemispheric, and global contexts. Its expanded book review section offers in-depth analysis of recent American Studies scholarship to promote further discussion and debate.