驼鹿和白尾鹿的死亡率在秋季和冬末达到高峰

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Nathaniel H. Wehr, Seth A. Moore, Edmund J. Isaac, Kenneth F. Kellner, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Jerrold L. Belant
{"title":"驼鹿和白尾鹿的死亡率在秋季和冬末达到高峰","authors":"Nathaniel H. Wehr,&nbsp;Seth A. Moore,&nbsp;Edmund J. Isaac,&nbsp;Kenneth F. Kellner,&nbsp;Joshua J. Millspaugh,&nbsp;Jerrold L. Belant","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa manages for sustainable subsistence harvests of moose (mooz; <i>Alces alces</i>) and white-tailed deer (waawaashkeshi; <i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>). Moose populations in northern Minnesota, USA, are declining, which may necessitate alterations to Indigenous subsistence practices. Moose and deer exhibit seasonal behaviors such as altered space use and movement strategies, to which gray wolves (ma'iingan; <i>Canis lupus</i>) and humans may adapt, resulting in seasonal mortality patterns. Identifying periods of increased moose and deer vulnerability is important for achieving tribal conservation objectives. We assessed seasonal cause-specific mortality of adult moose (2010–2021) and deer (2016–2022) fitted with global positioning system collars on and near the Grand Portage Indian Reservation (Gichi Onigaming; GPIR) in Minnesota and hypothesized mortality risk would be influenced by species-specific space use patterns and weather. We estimated survival rates and mortality risk using time-to-event models. We recorded 42 moose mortalities (17 health issues, 8 predations, 4 subsistence harvests, 13 unknown causes) and 49 deer mortalities (26 predations, 13 harvests, 4 other causes, 6 unknown causes). Mean annual moose survival was 83.2%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 April) and fall (~8 October). Mean annual deer survival was 48.0%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 March) and during their fall migration period (~11 November). Mortality timing coincided with transitions between space use states (i.e., periods of spatial stability), suggesting ungulates are at greater risk during these transitional periods, though movement strategy (i.e., resident vs. migratory) did not influence mortality risk. Further, increased winter severity corresponded with increased deer mortality. We observed similar temporal peaks in mortality risk when harvest mortalities were censored, suggesting our observed seasonal mortality peaks occur naturally despite harvest comprising most fall deer mortality. Our results can inform population models and harvest regulations by identifying periods of mortality risk on GPIR under Anishinaabe principles of seventh-generation conservation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moose and white-tailed deer mortality peaks in fall and late winter\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel H. Wehr,&nbsp;Seth A. Moore,&nbsp;Edmund J. Isaac,&nbsp;Kenneth F. Kellner,&nbsp;Joshua J. Millspaugh,&nbsp;Jerrold L. Belant\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa manages for sustainable subsistence harvests of moose (mooz; <i>Alces alces</i>) and white-tailed deer (waawaashkeshi; <i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>). Moose populations in northern Minnesota, USA, are declining, which may necessitate alterations to Indigenous subsistence practices. Moose and deer exhibit seasonal behaviors such as altered space use and movement strategies, to which gray wolves (ma'iingan; <i>Canis lupus</i>) and humans may adapt, resulting in seasonal mortality patterns. Identifying periods of increased moose and deer vulnerability is important for achieving tribal conservation objectives. We assessed seasonal cause-specific mortality of adult moose (2010–2021) and deer (2016–2022) fitted with global positioning system collars on and near the Grand Portage Indian Reservation (Gichi Onigaming; GPIR) in Minnesota and hypothesized mortality risk would be influenced by species-specific space use patterns and weather. We estimated survival rates and mortality risk using time-to-event models. We recorded 42 moose mortalities (17 health issues, 8 predations, 4 subsistence harvests, 13 unknown causes) and 49 deer mortalities (26 predations, 13 harvests, 4 other causes, 6 unknown causes). Mean annual moose survival was 83.2%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 April) and fall (~8 October). Mean annual deer survival was 48.0%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 March) and during their fall migration period (~11 November). Mortality timing coincided with transitions between space use states (i.e., periods of spatial stability), suggesting ungulates are at greater risk during these transitional periods, though movement strategy (i.e., resident vs. migratory) did not influence mortality risk. Further, increased winter severity corresponded with increased deer mortality. We observed similar temporal peaks in mortality risk when harvest mortalities were censored, suggesting our observed seasonal mortality peaks occur naturally despite harvest comprising most fall deer mortality. Our results can inform population models and harvest regulations by identifying periods of mortality risk on GPIR under Anishinaabe principles of seventh-generation conservation planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22580\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏必利尔湖奇佩瓦族大波尔塔吉部落管理着驼鹿(mooz;Alces alces)和白尾鹿(waawaashkeshi;Odocoileus virginianus)的可持续生存收获。美国明尼苏达州北部的驼鹿数量正在减少,这可能需要改变土著人的生存方式。驼鹿和鹿会表现出季节性行为,如改变空间利用和移动策略,而灰狼(ma'iingan;Canis lupus)和人类可能会适应这种行为,从而导致季节性死亡模式。确定驼鹿和鹿脆弱性增加的时期对于实现部落保护目标非常重要。我们评估了明尼苏达州大波蒂奇印第安保留地(Gichi Onigaming; GPIR)及其附近安装了全球定位系统项圈的成年驼鹿(2010-2021 年)和鹿(2016-2022 年)的季节性特定原因死亡率,并假设死亡率风险会受到物种特定空间使用模式和天气的影响。我们使用时间到事件模型估算了存活率和死亡风险。我们记录了 42 起驼鹿死亡事件(17 起健康问题、8 起捕食、4 起自给性捕猎、13 起原因不明)和 49 起鹿死亡事件(26 起捕食、13 起捕猎、4 起其他原因、6 起原因不明)。驼鹿的年平均存活率为 83.2%,死亡风险在冬末(约 4 月 25 日)和秋季(约 10 月 8 日)达到高峰。鹿的年平均存活率为 48.0%,死亡风险在冬末(约 3 月 25 日)和秋季迁徙期(约 11 月 11 日)达到峰值。死亡时间与空间利用状态之间的转换(即空间稳定期)相吻合,这表明有蹄类动物在这些过渡时期面临更大的风险,尽管运动策略(即常住与迁徙)并不影响死亡风险。此外,冬季严重程度的增加与鹿死亡率的增加相对应。我们观察到,当采伐死亡率被删减时,死亡风险也会出现类似的时间峰值,这表明我们观察到的季节性死亡峰值是自然出现的,尽管采伐构成了大部分鹿的秋季死亡。根据第七代保护规划的阿尼西纳比原则,我们的研究结果可以通过确定 GPIR 的死亡风险期为种群模型和采伐法规提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Moose and white-tailed deer mortality peaks in fall and late winter

Moose and white-tailed deer mortality peaks in fall and late winter

Moose and white-tailed deer mortality peaks in fall and late winter

The Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa manages for sustainable subsistence harvests of moose (mooz; Alces alces) and white-tailed deer (waawaashkeshi; Odocoileus virginianus). Moose populations in northern Minnesota, USA, are declining, which may necessitate alterations to Indigenous subsistence practices. Moose and deer exhibit seasonal behaviors such as altered space use and movement strategies, to which gray wolves (ma'iingan; Canis lupus) and humans may adapt, resulting in seasonal mortality patterns. Identifying periods of increased moose and deer vulnerability is important for achieving tribal conservation objectives. We assessed seasonal cause-specific mortality of adult moose (2010–2021) and deer (2016–2022) fitted with global positioning system collars on and near the Grand Portage Indian Reservation (Gichi Onigaming; GPIR) in Minnesota and hypothesized mortality risk would be influenced by species-specific space use patterns and weather. We estimated survival rates and mortality risk using time-to-event models. We recorded 42 moose mortalities (17 health issues, 8 predations, 4 subsistence harvests, 13 unknown causes) and 49 deer mortalities (26 predations, 13 harvests, 4 other causes, 6 unknown causes). Mean annual moose survival was 83.2%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 April) and fall (~8 October). Mean annual deer survival was 48.0%, and mortality risk peaked during late winter (~25 March) and during their fall migration period (~11 November). Mortality timing coincided with transitions between space use states (i.e., periods of spatial stability), suggesting ungulates are at greater risk during these transitional periods, though movement strategy (i.e., resident vs. migratory) did not influence mortality risk. Further, increased winter severity corresponded with increased deer mortality. We observed similar temporal peaks in mortality risk when harvest mortalities were censored, suggesting our observed seasonal mortality peaks occur naturally despite harvest comprising most fall deer mortality. Our results can inform population models and harvest regulations by identifying periods of mortality risk on GPIR under Anishinaabe principles of seventh-generation conservation planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信