丝虫Acanthocheilonema viteae感染箭蜱Ornithodoros moubata moubata引起的免疫反应

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY
D. Hutton, A.P. Reid, S. Townson
{"title":"丝虫Acanthocheilonema viteae感染箭蜱Ornithodoros moubata moubata引起的免疫反应","authors":"D. Hutton, A.P. Reid, S. Townson","doi":"10.1017/s0022149x00700952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigations were undertaken to determine whether the tick <jats:italic>Ornithodoros moubata</jats:italic><jats:italic>moubata</jats:italic> mounted a detectable immune response to primary and secondary infections with <jats:italic>Acanthocheilonema viteae</jats:italic>. Uninfected control tick survival rate was 70%, but only 45% in the primary infection group. Post-secondary infection survival rate (82%) was comparable to controls, indicating that these selected ticks had some protective advantage. Mean <jats:italic>A. viteae</jats:italic> infective larvae recovery from ticks with secondary infections was 31.4% lower than expected, suggesting the development of immunity. SDS–PAGE of haemolymph for proteins induced post-primary infection yielded a stronger signal at 45 kDa than controls, which was further elevated post-secondary infection. Proteins at 48, 22 and 16 to 18 kDa were detected in haemolymph from infected ticks but not seen from controls. The direct effect of haemolymph on microfilarial viability was examined using a novel <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> assay; in these preliminary trials no differences were observed in parasite viability when exposed to haemolymph from infected or uninfected groups of ticks.","PeriodicalId":15928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Helminthology","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune responses of the argasid tick Ornithodoros moubata moubata induced by infection with the filarial worm Acanthocheilonema viteae\",\"authors\":\"D. Hutton, A.P. Reid, S. Townson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0022149x00700952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigations were undertaken to determine whether the tick <jats:italic>Ornithodoros moubata</jats:italic><jats:italic>moubata</jats:italic> mounted a detectable immune response to primary and secondary infections with <jats:italic>Acanthocheilonema viteae</jats:italic>. Uninfected control tick survival rate was 70%, but only 45% in the primary infection group. Post-secondary infection survival rate (82%) was comparable to controls, indicating that these selected ticks had some protective advantage. Mean <jats:italic>A. viteae</jats:italic> infective larvae recovery from ticks with secondary infections was 31.4% lower than expected, suggesting the development of immunity. SDS–PAGE of haemolymph for proteins induced post-primary infection yielded a stronger signal at 45 kDa than controls, which was further elevated post-secondary infection. Proteins at 48, 22 and 16 to 18 kDa were detected in haemolymph from infected ticks but not seen from controls. The direct effect of haemolymph on microfilarial viability was examined using a novel <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> assay; in these preliminary trials no differences were observed in parasite viability when exposed to haemolymph from infected or uninfected groups of ticks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Helminthology\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Helminthology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x00700952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Helminthology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x00700952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的目的是确定蜱Ornithodoros moubatamoubata是否会对Acanthocheilonema viteae的初次和继发感染产生可检测到的免疫反应。未感染对照组蜱的存活率为 70%,而初次感染组仅为 45%。二次感染后的存活率(82%)与对照组相当,表明这些被选中的蜱具有一定的保护优势。从二次感染的蜱虫中恢复的平均虫体幼虫感染率比预期的低 31.4%,这表明蜱虫已经产生了免疫力。对初次感染后诱导蛋白质的血淋巴进行 SDS-PAGE 分析,发现 45 kDa 的信号比对照组强,二次感染后进一步升高。在受感染蜱的血淋巴中检测到了 48、22 和 16 至 18 kDa 蛋白质,而对照组中则没有检测到。血淋巴对微丝蚴存活率的直接影响是使用一种新型体外检测方法进行检测的;在这些初步试验中,当暴露于感染或未感染蜱群的血淋巴中时,寄生虫存活率没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune responses of the argasid tick Ornithodoros moubata moubata induced by infection with the filarial worm Acanthocheilonema viteae
Investigations were undertaken to determine whether the tick Ornithodoros moubatamoubata mounted a detectable immune response to primary and secondary infections with Acanthocheilonema viteae. Uninfected control tick survival rate was 70%, but only 45% in the primary infection group. Post-secondary infection survival rate (82%) was comparable to controls, indicating that these selected ticks had some protective advantage. Mean A. viteae infective larvae recovery from ticks with secondary infections was 31.4% lower than expected, suggesting the development of immunity. SDS–PAGE of haemolymph for proteins induced post-primary infection yielded a stronger signal at 45 kDa than controls, which was further elevated post-secondary infection. Proteins at 48, 22 and 16 to 18 kDa were detected in haemolymph from infected ticks but not seen from controls. The direct effect of haemolymph on microfilarial viability was examined using a novel in vitro assay; in these preliminary trials no differences were observed in parasite viability when exposed to haemolymph from infected or uninfected groups of ticks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Helminthology
Journal of Helminthology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
127
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Helminthology publishes original papers and review articles on all aspects of pure and applied helminthology, particularly those helminth parasites of environmental health, medical or veterinary importance. Research papers on helminths in wildlife hosts, including plant and insect parasites, are also published along with taxonomic papers contributing to the systematics of a group. The journal will be of interest to academics and researchers involved in the fields of human and veterinary parasitology, public health, microbiology, ecology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信