殖民地创伤:消失的地形、创伤的反思性和反移情的历史化

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Ethos Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1111/etho.12428
Nichola Khan
{"title":"殖民地创伤:消失的地形、创伤的反思性和反移情的历史化","authors":"Nichola Khan","doi":"10.1111/etho.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyzes trauma as an interplay of mass violence connecting imperial occupation in British Hong Kong, and an Anglo-Chinese family in England. It takes Devereux's concept of countertransference to interrogate how killings in the author's family reverberate as traumatic transferences in fieldwork engaging the transgenerational violence of Partition in postcolonial Pakistan. Routing through transferences, it advances a comparative analysis of colonial trauma; moving from the individual to universal through layerings of traumatic silence, existential struggles, and the unconscious. It asks: what kinds of reflexivity are entailed by the double-nature of the traumatized subject writing about trauma? Can colonial trauma retain specificity, while speaking to the discordant temporal settlement and relational formation of broader interconnected histories, geographical partitions, and generational loss? Psychological anthropology offers a mode for filling in blanks; privileging the subjectivity of inheritors of colonial trauma for ethnographic theorizations into ways anthropologists might reckon with the psychic violence of colonial pasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51532,"journal":{"name":"Ethos","volume":"52 3","pages":"384-400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12428","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonial trauma: Terrains of disappearance, traumatic reflexivity, and historicizing countertransference\",\"authors\":\"Nichola Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/etho.12428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article analyzes trauma as an interplay of mass violence connecting imperial occupation in British Hong Kong, and an Anglo-Chinese family in England. It takes Devereux's concept of countertransference to interrogate how killings in the author's family reverberate as traumatic transferences in fieldwork engaging the transgenerational violence of Partition in postcolonial Pakistan. Routing through transferences, it advances a comparative analysis of colonial trauma; moving from the individual to universal through layerings of traumatic silence, existential struggles, and the unconscious. It asks: what kinds of reflexivity are entailed by the double-nature of the traumatized subject writing about trauma? Can colonial trauma retain specificity, while speaking to the discordant temporal settlement and relational formation of broader interconnected histories, geographical partitions, and generational loss? Psychological anthropology offers a mode for filling in blanks; privileging the subjectivity of inheritors of colonial trauma for ethnographic theorizations into ways anthropologists might reckon with the psychic violence of colonial pasts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethos\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"384-400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/etho.12428\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/etho.12428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了大规模暴力与英属香港的帝国占领以及英国的一个英籍华人家庭之间相互影响的创伤。文章采用德弗罗(Devereux)的 "反移情"(countertransference)概念,探讨了作者家庭中的杀戮事件如何作为创伤移情,在涉及后殖民时期巴基斯坦种族隔离的跨代暴力的田野工作中产生反响。通过转移,它推进了对殖民地创伤的比较分析;通过创伤沉默、生存斗争和无意识的层层递进,从个体走向普遍。它提出了这样的问题:创伤主体书写创伤的双重性会带来什么样的反思?殖民地创伤能否保持其特殊性,同时又能反映更广泛的相互关联的历史、地理分隔和世代失落的不和谐的时间沉淀和关系形成?心理人类学提供了一种填补空白的模式;将殖民创伤继承者的主体性作为人种学理论的特权,使人类学家能够重新认识殖民历史的精神暴力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonial trauma: Terrains of disappearance, traumatic reflexivity, and historicizing countertransference

This article analyzes trauma as an interplay of mass violence connecting imperial occupation in British Hong Kong, and an Anglo-Chinese family in England. It takes Devereux's concept of countertransference to interrogate how killings in the author's family reverberate as traumatic transferences in fieldwork engaging the transgenerational violence of Partition in postcolonial Pakistan. Routing through transferences, it advances a comparative analysis of colonial trauma; moving from the individual to universal through layerings of traumatic silence, existential struggles, and the unconscious. It asks: what kinds of reflexivity are entailed by the double-nature of the traumatized subject writing about trauma? Can colonial trauma retain specificity, while speaking to the discordant temporal settlement and relational formation of broader interconnected histories, geographical partitions, and generational loss? Psychological anthropology offers a mode for filling in blanks; privileging the subjectivity of inheritors of colonial trauma for ethnographic theorizations into ways anthropologists might reckon with the psychic violence of colonial pasts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethos
Ethos Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethos is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly journal devoted to scholarly articles dealing with the interrelationships between the individual and the sociocultural milieu, between the psychological disciplines and the social disciplines. The journal publishes work from a wide spectrum of research perspectives. Recent issues, for example, include papers on religion and ritual, medical practice, child development, family relationships, interactional dynamics, history and subjectivity, feminist approaches, emotion, cognitive modeling and cultural belief systems. Methodologies range from analyses of language and discourse, to ethnographic and historical interpretations, to experimental treatments and cross-cultural comparisons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信