与肾动脉去神经化和设备有关的争议。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chibuike Charles Agwuegbo, Akanimo Usen Antia, Garba Rimamskep Shamaki, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel
{"title":"与肾动脉去神经化和设备有关的争议。","authors":"Chibuike Charles Agwuegbo, Akanimo Usen Antia, Garba Rimamskep Shamaki, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel","doi":"10.1097/hco.0000000000001146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article discusses the controversies, strengths, and limitations of the current literature on renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension, as well as the future directions of this intervention.","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversies related to renal artery denervation and devices.\",\"authors\":\"Chibuike Charles Agwuegbo, Akanimo Usen Antia, Garba Rimamskep Shamaki, Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/hco.0000000000001146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review article discusses the controversies, strengths, and limitations of the current literature on renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension, as well as the future directions of this intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000001146\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000001146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述文章讨论了目前关于肾动脉去神经化治疗耐药性高血压的文献中存在的争议、优势和局限性,以及这种干预方法的未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversies related to renal artery denervation and devices.
This review article discusses the controversies, strengths, and limitations of the current literature on renal artery denervation in the management of resistant hypertension, as well as the future directions of this intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信