{"title":"三篇吠陀散文叙事中的动词方面注释","authors":"Anahita Gwenllian Hoose","doi":"10.1111/1467-968x.12290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article summarises the synchronic system of verbal aspect manifest in three Middle Vedic prose narrative texts, investigating the use of various morphological categories with past reference (especially the imperfect, perfect and aorist). I show that the imperfect and perfect are both compatible with multiple aspectual readings (perfective, imperfective and anterior); in the terminology of Dahl (2010), both may have neutral aspect. The aorist is largely restricted to anterior readings but can be perfective. Additionally, I consider the diachronic context of this system, outlining differences from the earlier one visible in the Early Vedic of the <i>Rigveda</i> and discussing the probable diachronic trajectory connecting the two. After commenting on the possibility of characterising the synchronic system within the alternative framework of Altshuler (2014), which lacks the category of neutral aspect, I conclude with notes on the use of the sentential particles <i>ha</i>, <i>nu</i> and <i>vai</i> in the text samples. The first of these seems to be associated with perfective aspect, while the latter two are both associated with anterior aspect.","PeriodicalId":44794,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE PHILOLOGICAL SOCIETY","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Notes on Verbal Aspect in Three Vedic Prose Narratives\",\"authors\":\"Anahita Gwenllian Hoose\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-968x.12290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article summarises the synchronic system of verbal aspect manifest in three Middle Vedic prose narrative texts, investigating the use of various morphological categories with past reference (especially the imperfect, perfect and aorist). I show that the imperfect and perfect are both compatible with multiple aspectual readings (perfective, imperfective and anterior); in the terminology of Dahl (2010), both may have neutral aspect. The aorist is largely restricted to anterior readings but can be perfective. Additionally, I consider the diachronic context of this system, outlining differences from the earlier one visible in the Early Vedic of the <i>Rigveda</i> and discussing the probable diachronic trajectory connecting the two. After commenting on the possibility of characterising the synchronic system within the alternative framework of Altshuler (2014), which lacks the category of neutral aspect, I conclude with notes on the use of the sentential particles <i>ha</i>, <i>nu</i> and <i>vai</i> in the text samples. The first of these seems to be associated with perfective aspect, while the latter two are both associated with anterior aspect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TRANSACTIONS OF THE PHILOLOGICAL SOCIETY\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TRANSACTIONS OF THE PHILOLOGICAL SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12290\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE PHILOLOGICAL SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文总结了三篇中古吠陀散文叙事文本中所体现的动词方面的同步系统,研究了带有过去指称的各种形态类别(尤其是未完成时、完成时和动名词)的使用情况。我的研究表明,未完成时和完成时都兼容多种方面读法(完成时、未完成时和前时);用 Dahl(2010 年)的术语来说,两者都可能具有中性方面。动名词在很大程度上仅限于前读,但也可以是完成时。此外,我还考虑了这一系统的异时空背景,概述了它与早期《梨俱吠陀》吠陀语系统的不同之处,并讨论了连接两者的可能异时空轨迹。在对 Altshuler(2014 年)的替代框架(该框架缺乏中性方面的类别)中描述同步系统的可能性进行评论之后,我对文本样本中使用的句式微词 ha、nu 和 vai 进行了总结。前者似乎与完成时方面有关,而后两者都与前方面有关。
Notes on Verbal Aspect in Three Vedic Prose Narratives
This article summarises the synchronic system of verbal aspect manifest in three Middle Vedic prose narrative texts, investigating the use of various morphological categories with past reference (especially the imperfect, perfect and aorist). I show that the imperfect and perfect are both compatible with multiple aspectual readings (perfective, imperfective and anterior); in the terminology of Dahl (2010), both may have neutral aspect. The aorist is largely restricted to anterior readings but can be perfective. Additionally, I consider the diachronic context of this system, outlining differences from the earlier one visible in the Early Vedic of the Rigveda and discussing the probable diachronic trajectory connecting the two. After commenting on the possibility of characterising the synchronic system within the alternative framework of Altshuler (2014), which lacks the category of neutral aspect, I conclude with notes on the use of the sentential particles ha, nu and vai in the text samples. The first of these seems to be associated with perfective aspect, while the latter two are both associated with anterior aspect.
期刊介绍:
Transactions of the Philological Society continues the earlier Proceedings (1852-53), and is the oldest scholarly periodical devoted to the general study of language and languages that has an unbroken tradition. Transactions reflects a wide range of linguistic interest and contains articles on a diversity of topics: among those published in recent years have been papers on phonology, Romance linguistics, generative grammar, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, Indo-European philology and the history of English.