A.R. Brown, M. Molinas, Y. Roebbert, R. Faizova, T. Vitova, A. Sato, M. Hada, M. Abe, M. Mazzanti, S. Weyer, R. Bernier-Latmani
{"title":"细菌还原过程中紫外线的同位素特征","authors":"A.R. Brown, M. Molinas, Y. Roebbert, R. Faizova, T. Vitova, A. Sato, M. Hada, M. Abe, M. Mazzanti, S. Weyer, R. Bernier-Latmani","doi":"10.7185/geochemlet.2411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two step electron transfer during bacterial reduction of U<sup>VI</sup> to U<sup>IV</sup> is typically accompanied by mass-independent fractionation of the <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>235</sup>U isotopes, whereby the heavy isotope accumulates in the reduced product. However, the role of the U<sup>V</sup> intermediate in the fractionation mechanism is unresolved due to the challenges associated with its chemical stability. Here, we employed the U<sup>V</sup> stabilising ligand, dpaea<sup>2-</sup>, to trap aqueous U<sup>V</sup> during U<sup>VI</sup> reduction by <em>Shewanella oneidensis</em>. Whilst the first reduction step from U<sup>VI</sup> to U<sup>V</sup> displayed negligible fractionation, reduction of U<sup>V</sup> to U<sup>IV</sup> revealed mass-dependent isotope fractionation (preferential reduction of the <sup>235</sup>U), contrary to most previous observations. This surprising behaviour highlights the control that the U-coordinating ligand exerts over the balance between reactant U supply, electron transfer rate, and U<sup>IV</sup> product sequestration, suggesting that U<sup>V</sup> speciation should be considered when using U isotope ratios to reconstruct environmental redox conditions.","PeriodicalId":12613,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The isotopic signature of UV during bacterial reduction\",\"authors\":\"A.R. Brown, M. Molinas, Y. Roebbert, R. Faizova, T. Vitova, A. Sato, M. Hada, M. Abe, M. Mazzanti, S. Weyer, R. Bernier-Latmani\",\"doi\":\"10.7185/geochemlet.2411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The two step electron transfer during bacterial reduction of U<sup>VI</sup> to U<sup>IV</sup> is typically accompanied by mass-independent fractionation of the <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>235</sup>U isotopes, whereby the heavy isotope accumulates in the reduced product. However, the role of the U<sup>V</sup> intermediate in the fractionation mechanism is unresolved due to the challenges associated with its chemical stability. Here, we employed the U<sup>V</sup> stabilising ligand, dpaea<sup>2-</sup>, to trap aqueous U<sup>V</sup> during U<sup>VI</sup> reduction by <em>Shewanella oneidensis</em>. Whilst the first reduction step from U<sup>VI</sup> to U<sup>V</sup> displayed negligible fractionation, reduction of U<sup>V</sup> to U<sup>IV</sup> revealed mass-dependent isotope fractionation (preferential reduction of the <sup>235</sup>U), contrary to most previous observations. This surprising behaviour highlights the control that the U-coordinating ligand exerts over the balance between reactant U supply, electron transfer rate, and U<sup>IV</sup> product sequestration, suggesting that U<sup>V</sup> speciation should be considered when using U isotope ratios to reconstruct environmental redox conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochemical Perspectives Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Perspectives Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The isotopic signature of UV during bacterial reduction
The two step electron transfer during bacterial reduction of UVI to UIV is typically accompanied by mass-independent fractionation of the 238U and 235U isotopes, whereby the heavy isotope accumulates in the reduced product. However, the role of the UV intermediate in the fractionation mechanism is unresolved due to the challenges associated with its chemical stability. Here, we employed the UV stabilising ligand, dpaea2-, to trap aqueous UV during UVI reduction by Shewanella oneidensis. Whilst the first reduction step from UVI to UV displayed negligible fractionation, reduction of UV to UIV revealed mass-dependent isotope fractionation (preferential reduction of the 235U), contrary to most previous observations. This surprising behaviour highlights the control that the U-coordinating ligand exerts over the balance between reactant U supply, electron transfer rate, and UIV product sequestration, suggesting that UV speciation should be considered when using U isotope ratios to reconstruct environmental redox conditions.
期刊介绍:
Geochemical Perspectives Letters is an open access, internationally peer-reviewed journal of the European Association of Geochemistry (EAG) that publishes short, highest-quality articles spanning geochemical sciences. The journal aims at rapid publication of the most novel research in geochemistry with a focus on outstanding quality, international importance, originality, and stimulating new developments across the vast array of geochemical disciplines.