复杂问题解决任务中的多项式有效性指标及其在开发测量模型中的应用

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Pujue Wang, Hongyun Liu
{"title":"复杂问题解决任务中的多项式有效性指标及其在开发测量模型中的应用","authors":"Pujue Wang, Hongyun Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent years have witnessed the emergence of measurement models for analyzing action sequences in computer-based problem-solving interactive tasks. The cutting-edge psychometrics process models require pre-specification of the effectiveness of state transitions often simplifying them into dichotomous indicators. However, the dichotomous effectiveness becomes impractical when dealing with complex tasks that involve multiple optimal paths and numerous state transitions. Building on the concept of problem-solving, we introduce polytomous indicators to assess the effectiveness of problem states <span>\\(d_{s}\\)</span> and state-to-state transitions <span>\\({\\mathrm {\\Delta }d}_{\\mathrm {s\\rightarrow s'}}\\)</span>. The three-step evaluation method for these two types of indicators is proposed and illustrated across two real problem-solving tasks. We further present a novel psychometrics process model, the sequential response model with polytomous effectiveness indicators (SRM-PEI), which is tailored to encompass a broader range of problem-solving tasks. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that SRM-PEI performed well in the estimation of latent ability and transition tendency parameters across different conditions. Empirical studies conducted on two real tasks supported the better fit of SRM-PEI over previous models such as SRM and SRMM, providing rational and interpretable estimates of latent abilities and transition tendencies through effectiveness indicators. The paper concludes by outlining potential avenues for the further application and enhancement of polytomous effectiveness indicators and SRM-PEI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54534,"journal":{"name":"Psychometrika","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model\",\"authors\":\"Pujue Wang, Hongyun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent years have witnessed the emergence of measurement models for analyzing action sequences in computer-based problem-solving interactive tasks. The cutting-edge psychometrics process models require pre-specification of the effectiveness of state transitions often simplifying them into dichotomous indicators. However, the dichotomous effectiveness becomes impractical when dealing with complex tasks that involve multiple optimal paths and numerous state transitions. Building on the concept of problem-solving, we introduce polytomous indicators to assess the effectiveness of problem states <span>\\\\(d_{s}\\\\)</span> and state-to-state transitions <span>\\\\({\\\\mathrm {\\\\Delta }d}_{\\\\mathrm {s\\\\rightarrow s'}}\\\\)</span>. The three-step evaluation method for these two types of indicators is proposed and illustrated across two real problem-solving tasks. We further present a novel psychometrics process model, the sequential response model with polytomous effectiveness indicators (SRM-PEI), which is tailored to encompass a broader range of problem-solving tasks. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that SRM-PEI performed well in the estimation of latent ability and transition tendency parameters across different conditions. Empirical studies conducted on two real tasks supported the better fit of SRM-PEI over previous models such as SRM and SRMM, providing rational and interpretable estimates of latent abilities and transition tendencies through effectiveness indicators. The paper concludes by outlining potential avenues for the further application and enhancement of polytomous effectiveness indicators and SRM-PEI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychometrika\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychometrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychometrika","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-024-09963-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在基于计算机的问题解决互动任务中,出现了用于分析行动序列的测量模型。最先进的心理测量过程模型要求预先指定状态转换的有效性,通常将其简化为二分法指标。然而,在处理涉及多个最佳路径和无数状态转换的复杂任务时,二分法的有效性就变得不切实际了。基于问题解决的概念,我们引入了多态指标来评估问题状态(d_{s}\)和状态到状态转换({\mathrm {\Delta }d}_{\mathrm {s\rightarrow s'}}\)的有效性。我们提出了这两类指标的三步评估方法,并在两个真实的问题解决任务中进行了说明。我们还进一步提出了一种新的心理测量过程模型,即具有多态有效性指标的序列反应模型(SRM-PEI),该模型是为涵盖更广泛的问题解决任务而量身定制的。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,SRM-PEI 在估计不同条件下的潜在能力和过渡倾向参数方面表现良好。在两个真实任务上进行的实证研究证明,SRM-PEI 比 SRM 和 SRMM 等以前的模型拟合得更好,通过有效性指标提供了合理的、可解释的潜在能力和过渡倾向估计值。本文最后概述了进一步应用和改进多项式效能指标和 SRM-PEI 的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model

Polytomous Effectiveness Indicators in Complex Problem-Solving Tasks and Their Applications in Developing Measurement Model

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of measurement models for analyzing action sequences in computer-based problem-solving interactive tasks. The cutting-edge psychometrics process models require pre-specification of the effectiveness of state transitions often simplifying them into dichotomous indicators. However, the dichotomous effectiveness becomes impractical when dealing with complex tasks that involve multiple optimal paths and numerous state transitions. Building on the concept of problem-solving, we introduce polytomous indicators to assess the effectiveness of problem states \(d_{s}\) and state-to-state transitions \({\mathrm {\Delta }d}_{\mathrm {s\rightarrow s'}}\). The three-step evaluation method for these two types of indicators is proposed and illustrated across two real problem-solving tasks. We further present a novel psychometrics process model, the sequential response model with polytomous effectiveness indicators (SRM-PEI), which is tailored to encompass a broader range of problem-solving tasks. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that SRM-PEI performed well in the estimation of latent ability and transition tendency parameters across different conditions. Empirical studies conducted on two real tasks supported the better fit of SRM-PEI over previous models such as SRM and SRMM, providing rational and interpretable estimates of latent abilities and transition tendencies through effectiveness indicators. The paper concludes by outlining potential avenues for the further application and enhancement of polytomous effectiveness indicators and SRM-PEI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychometrika
Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信