双侧植入非屈光性延展视力眼内透镜后,比较目视与小单视的视觉效果:随机试验

Vaishali Vasavada, Shail A. Vasavada, Lajja Shastri, Vandana Nath, Abhay R. Vasavada, Samaresh Srivastava, Vaishali Vasavada
{"title":"双侧植入非屈光性延展视力眼内透镜后,比较目视与小单视的视觉效果:随机试验","authors":"Vaishali Vasavada, Shail A. Vasavada, Lajja Shastri, Vandana Nath, Abhay R. Vasavada, Samaresh Srivastava, Vaishali Vasavada","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens(IOL) when targeting emmetropia versus mini-monovision Setting: Iladevi Cataract &amp; IOL Research Centre,India Design: Prospective,randomized controlled trial Methods: Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with an extended vision IOL(Vivity, Alcon Laboratories, USA) randomized to: group I- IOL implantation with emmetropic target in both eyes, or group II- IOL implantation with mini-monovision of -0.5 diopters(D). Outcome measures evaluated 6 months postoperatively were: unaided and corrected near visual acuity(UNVA, CNVA) at 40 centimeters(cm), unaided and corrected distance(UDVA, CDVA) and intermediate (UIVA, CIVA) visual acuity at 66cm. Mesopic contrast sensitivity, binocular defocus curve, patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire and satisfaction on the McAlinden questionnaire were also assessed. Results: 70 patients enrolled in study. 34 and 33 patients in groups I and II completed follow-up. Binocular UNVA was significantly better in group II (0.26<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.05 vs 0.22<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03). Reading add required in group II was significantly lower. UIVA (0.09<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.06 vs 0.07<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.08 LogMAR, P=0.15) and UDVA (0.02<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.04 vs 0.02<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.05 LogMAR, P=0.78) were not significantly different between groups. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between the groups. Binocular defocus curve showed significantly better mean visual acuities between -2.0 to -3.0 diopters in group II. Patients in both groups had high levels of spectacle independence, with no patient reporting dysphotopsia. Conclusion: Binocular UNVA was significantly better, with comparable UDVA and mesopic contrast sensitivity when targeting mini monovision with the non-diffractive extended vision IOL as compared to targeting binocular emmetropia.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual outcomes comparing emmetropia versus mini-monovision following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens:randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Vaishali Vasavada, Shail A. Vasavada, Lajja Shastri, Vandana Nath, Abhay R. Vasavada, Samaresh Srivastava, Vaishali Vasavada\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens(IOL) when targeting emmetropia versus mini-monovision Setting: Iladevi Cataract &amp; IOL Research Centre,India Design: Prospective,randomized controlled trial Methods: Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with an extended vision IOL(Vivity, Alcon Laboratories, USA) randomized to: group I- IOL implantation with emmetropic target in both eyes, or group II- IOL implantation with mini-monovision of -0.5 diopters(D). Outcome measures evaluated 6 months postoperatively were: unaided and corrected near visual acuity(UNVA, CNVA) at 40 centimeters(cm), unaided and corrected distance(UDVA, CDVA) and intermediate (UIVA, CIVA) visual acuity at 66cm. Mesopic contrast sensitivity, binocular defocus curve, patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire and satisfaction on the McAlinden questionnaire were also assessed. Results: 70 patients enrolled in study. 34 and 33 patients in groups I and II completed follow-up. Binocular UNVA was significantly better in group II (0.26<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.05 vs 0.22<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03). Reading add required in group II was significantly lower. UIVA (0.09<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.06 vs 0.07<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.08 LogMAR, P=0.15) and UDVA (0.02<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.04 vs 0.02<jats:underline>+</jats:underline>0.05 LogMAR, P=0.78) were not significantly different between groups. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between the groups. Binocular defocus curve showed significantly better mean visual acuities between -2.0 to -3.0 diopters in group II. Patients in both groups had high levels of spectacle independence, with no patient reporting dysphotopsia. Conclusion: Binocular UNVA was significantly better, with comparable UDVA and mesopic contrast sensitivity when targeting mini monovision with the non-diffractive extended vision IOL as compared to targeting binocular emmetropia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较双侧植入非屈光性延展视力眼内人工晶体(IOL)后的视觉疗效和患者满意度(针对外斜视和小单视):印度Iladevi白内障& IOL研究中心 设计:前瞻性随机对照试验 方法:对接受双侧白内障手术的患者进行前瞻性随机对照试验:接受双侧白内障手术并植入延展视力人工晶体(Vivity,美国 Alcon 实验室)的患者,随机分为两组:第一组--双眼均为屈光目标的人工晶体植入术,或第二组---0.5 屈光度(D)的迷你单眼人工晶体植入术。术后 6 个月的评估结果为:40 厘米(cm)处的裸眼和矫正近视力(UNVA、CNVA)、66 厘米(cm)处的裸眼和矫正远视力(UDVA、CDVA)以及中视力(UIVA、CIVA)。此外,还评估了中视对比敏感度、双眼散焦曲线、患者报告的眼镜独立性问卷和麦卡林登满意度问卷。结果70 名患者参加了研究。第一组和第二组分别有 34 名和 33 名患者完成了随访。第二组的双眼 UNVA 明显更好(0.26+0.05 vs 0.22+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03)。第二组所需的阅读时间明显减少。组间的 UIVA(0.09+0.06 vs 0.07+0.08 LogMAR,P=0.15)和 UDVA(0.02+0.04 vs 0.02+0.05 LogMAR,P=0.78)无明显差异。组间中视对比敏感度无明显差异。双眼离焦曲线显示,第二组患者在-2.0至-3.0屈光度之间的平均视力明显更好。两组患者对眼镜的依赖程度都很高,没有患者报告有视力障碍。结论:使用非屈光性延展视力人工晶体治疗迷你单眼视力时,与治疗双眼屈光不正相比,双眼单眼视力明显更好,双眼屈光不正视力和中视对比敏感度相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual outcomes comparing emmetropia versus mini-monovision following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens:randomized trial
Purpose: To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended vision intraocular lens(IOL) when targeting emmetropia versus mini-monovision Setting: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre,India Design: Prospective,randomized controlled trial Methods: Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with an extended vision IOL(Vivity, Alcon Laboratories, USA) randomized to: group I- IOL implantation with emmetropic target in both eyes, or group II- IOL implantation with mini-monovision of -0.5 diopters(D). Outcome measures evaluated 6 months postoperatively were: unaided and corrected near visual acuity(UNVA, CNVA) at 40 centimeters(cm), unaided and corrected distance(UDVA, CDVA) and intermediate (UIVA, CIVA) visual acuity at 66cm. Mesopic contrast sensitivity, binocular defocus curve, patient reported spectacle independence questionnaire and satisfaction on the McAlinden questionnaire were also assessed. Results: 70 patients enrolled in study. 34 and 33 patients in groups I and II completed follow-up. Binocular UNVA was significantly better in group II (0.26+0.05 vs 0.22+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.03). Reading add required in group II was significantly lower. UIVA (0.09+0.06 vs 0.07+0.08 LogMAR, P=0.15) and UDVA (0.02+0.04 vs 0.02+0.05 LogMAR, P=0.78) were not significantly different between groups. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was not significantly different between the groups. Binocular defocus curve showed significantly better mean visual acuities between -2.0 to -3.0 diopters in group II. Patients in both groups had high levels of spectacle independence, with no patient reporting dysphotopsia. Conclusion: Binocular UNVA was significantly better, with comparable UDVA and mesopic contrast sensitivity when targeting mini monovision with the non-diffractive extended vision IOL as compared to targeting binocular emmetropia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信