巩膜隧道长度对带缘巩膜内触觉固定中人工晶体位置的影响

Jong Hwa Jun, Joon-Ho Kwak, Chang-Hyun Park, Jiyeon Lee, Jueun Seong, Kyu Young Shim, Natalie A. Afshari
{"title":"巩膜隧道长度对带缘巩膜内触觉固定中人工晶体位置的影响","authors":"Jong Hwa Jun, Joon-Ho Kwak, Chang-Hyun Park, Jiyeon Lee, Jueun Seong, Kyu Young Shim, Natalie A. Afshari","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the effect of scleral tunnel length on the effective lens position and tilt of the intraocular lens (IOL) in flanged intrascleral haptic fixation (ISHF) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Setting: Tertiary institution. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Methods: This study included 55 and 42 eyes that underwent ISHF with 1.0- and 2.0-mm scleral tunnels, respectively. Twenty-three eyes that underwent sutured fixation were used as a control. The anterior chamber depth (ACD), scleral tunnel length, incident angle of haptic, and tilting of optic were analyzed using AS-OCT. Results: The mean postoperative ACD, vertical tilt angle, and spherical equivalent of the 1.0-mm were 5.27 ± 0.39 mm, 6.04 ± 4.87°, and 0.38 ± 1.03 D, respectively. The ACD and vertical tilt angle of the 1.0-mm were larger than those of the others (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively), and the postoperative spherical equivalent was more hyperopic (p<0.05). The 2.0-mm exhibited a lower frequency of tilting greater than 7°. The inter-eye difference in ACD between in-the-bag fixation and ISHF of the1.0-mm tunnel was significantly greater than that in the 2.0-mm tunnel (p<0.05). The 1.0 mm tunnel had a significantly larger incident angle and a longer tunnel length (p<0.001, respectively) and showed a greater difference in the tunnel length on both sides (p<0.05). Conclusion: A shorter tunnel yielded a more unstable IOL position, greater variation in angle and tunnel length, and longer ACD during ISHF. An exact 2.0-mm tunnel must be created on both sides to achieve a stable and predictable IOL position.","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of scleral tunnel length on the position of IOLs in flanged intrascleral haptic fixation\",\"authors\":\"Jong Hwa Jun, Joon-Ho Kwak, Chang-Hyun Park, Jiyeon Lee, Jueun Seong, Kyu Young Shim, Natalie A. Afshari\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To investigate the effect of scleral tunnel length on the effective lens position and tilt of the intraocular lens (IOL) in flanged intrascleral haptic fixation (ISHF) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Setting: Tertiary institution. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Methods: This study included 55 and 42 eyes that underwent ISHF with 1.0- and 2.0-mm scleral tunnels, respectively. Twenty-three eyes that underwent sutured fixation were used as a control. The anterior chamber depth (ACD), scleral tunnel length, incident angle of haptic, and tilting of optic were analyzed using AS-OCT. Results: The mean postoperative ACD, vertical tilt angle, and spherical equivalent of the 1.0-mm were 5.27 ± 0.39 mm, 6.04 ± 4.87°, and 0.38 ± 1.03 D, respectively. The ACD and vertical tilt angle of the 1.0-mm were larger than those of the others (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively), and the postoperative spherical equivalent was more hyperopic (p<0.05). The 2.0-mm exhibited a lower frequency of tilting greater than 7°. The inter-eye difference in ACD between in-the-bag fixation and ISHF of the1.0-mm tunnel was significantly greater than that in the 2.0-mm tunnel (p<0.05). The 1.0 mm tunnel had a significantly larger incident angle and a longer tunnel length (p<0.001, respectively) and showed a greater difference in the tunnel length on both sides (p<0.05). Conclusion: A shorter tunnel yielded a more unstable IOL position, greater variation in angle and tunnel length, and longer ACD during ISHF. An exact 2.0-mm tunnel must be created on both sides to achieve a stable and predictable IOL position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 使用前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)研究巩膜隧道长度对带缘巩膜内触觉固定(ISHF)中眼内晶状体(IOL)的有效晶状体位置和倾斜度的影响。环境:三级医疗机构。设计:回顾性病例对照研究回顾性病例对照研究。研究方法:眼科中心研究对象包括分别使用 1.0 毫米和 2.0 毫米巩膜隧道进行 ISHF 的 55 眼和 42 眼。23只接受缝合固定的眼睛作为对照。使用 AS-OCT 分析了前房深度 (ACD)、巩膜隧道长度、触角入射角和视神经倾斜度。结果:术后 ACD、垂直倾斜角和 1.0 mm 的球面等效物的平均值分别为 5.27 ± 0.39 mm、6.04 ± 4.87° 和 0.38 ± 1.03 D。1.0 毫米的 ACD 和垂直倾斜角比其他产品大(分别为 p<0.001 和 p<0.05),术后球面等效度数更偏远(p<0.05)。2.0 毫米屈光度大于 7° 的频率较低。1.0 毫米隧道的袋内固定和 ISHF 的 ACD 眼间差明显大于 2.0 毫米隧道(p<0.05)。1.0 mm 隧道的入射角明显更大,隧道长度更长(分别为 p<0.001),两侧隧道长度差异更大(p<0.05)。结论:在 ISHF 过程中,较短的隧道会导致 IOL 位置更不稳定、角度和隧道长度变化更大以及 ACD 更长。必须在两侧创建精确的 2.0 毫米隧道,以实现稳定和可预测的人工晶体位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of scleral tunnel length on the position of IOLs in flanged intrascleral haptic fixation
Purpose: To investigate the effect of scleral tunnel length on the effective lens position and tilt of the intraocular lens (IOL) in flanged intrascleral haptic fixation (ISHF) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Setting: Tertiary institution. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Methods: This study included 55 and 42 eyes that underwent ISHF with 1.0- and 2.0-mm scleral tunnels, respectively. Twenty-three eyes that underwent sutured fixation were used as a control. The anterior chamber depth (ACD), scleral tunnel length, incident angle of haptic, and tilting of optic were analyzed using AS-OCT. Results: The mean postoperative ACD, vertical tilt angle, and spherical equivalent of the 1.0-mm were 5.27 ± 0.39 mm, 6.04 ± 4.87°, and 0.38 ± 1.03 D, respectively. The ACD and vertical tilt angle of the 1.0-mm were larger than those of the others (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively), and the postoperative spherical equivalent was more hyperopic (p<0.05). The 2.0-mm exhibited a lower frequency of tilting greater than 7°. The inter-eye difference in ACD between in-the-bag fixation and ISHF of the1.0-mm tunnel was significantly greater than that in the 2.0-mm tunnel (p<0.05). The 1.0 mm tunnel had a significantly larger incident angle and a longer tunnel length (p<0.001, respectively) and showed a greater difference in the tunnel length on both sides (p<0.05). Conclusion: A shorter tunnel yielded a more unstable IOL position, greater variation in angle and tunnel length, and longer ACD during ISHF. An exact 2.0-mm tunnel must be created on both sides to achieve a stable and predictable IOL position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信