阅读大脑中的句子优势

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Stéphane Dufau , Jeremy Yeaton , Jean-Michel Badier , Sophie Chen , Phillip J. Holcomb , Jonathan Grainger
{"title":"阅读大脑中的句子优势","authors":"Stéphane Dufau ,&nbsp;Jeremy Yeaton ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Badier ,&nbsp;Sophie Chen ,&nbsp;Phillip J. Holcomb ,&nbsp;Jonathan Grainger","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When a sequence of written words is briefly presented and participants are asked to identify just one word at a post-cued location, then word identification accuracy is higher when the word is presented in a grammatically correct sequence compared with an ungrammatical sequence. This sentence superiority effect has been reported in several behavioral studies and two EEG investigations. Taken together, the results of these studies support the hypothesis that the sentence superiority effect is primarily driven by rapid access to a sentence-level representation via partial word identification processes that operate in parallel over several words. Here we used MEG to examine the neural structures involved in this early stage of written sentence processing, and to further specify the timing of the different processes involved. Source activities over time showed grammatical vs. ungrammatical differences first in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG: 321–406 ms), then the left anterior temporal lobe (ATL: 466–531 ms), and finally in both left IFG (549–602 ms) and left posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG: 553–622 ms). We interpret the early IFG activity as reflecting the rapid bottom-up activation of sentence-level representations, including syntax, enabled by partly parallel word processing. Subsequent activity in ATL and pSTG is thought to reflect the constraints imposed by such sentence-level representations on on-going word-based semantic activation (ATL), and the subsequent development of a more detailed sentence-level representation (pSTG). These results provide further support for a cascaded interactive-activation account of sentence reading.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentence superiority in the reading brain\",\"authors\":\"Stéphane Dufau ,&nbsp;Jeremy Yeaton ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Badier ,&nbsp;Sophie Chen ,&nbsp;Phillip J. Holcomb ,&nbsp;Jonathan Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When a sequence of written words is briefly presented and participants are asked to identify just one word at a post-cued location, then word identification accuracy is higher when the word is presented in a grammatically correct sequence compared with an ungrammatical sequence. This sentence superiority effect has been reported in several behavioral studies and two EEG investigations. Taken together, the results of these studies support the hypothesis that the sentence superiority effect is primarily driven by rapid access to a sentence-level representation via partial word identification processes that operate in parallel over several words. Here we used MEG to examine the neural structures involved in this early stage of written sentence processing, and to further specify the timing of the different processes involved. Source activities over time showed grammatical vs. ungrammatical differences first in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG: 321–406 ms), then the left anterior temporal lobe (ATL: 466–531 ms), and finally in both left IFG (549–602 ms) and left posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG: 553–622 ms). We interpret the early IFG activity as reflecting the rapid bottom-up activation of sentence-level representations, including syntax, enabled by partly parallel word processing. Subsequent activity in ATL and pSTG is thought to reflect the constraints imposed by such sentence-level representations on on-going word-based semantic activation (ATL), and the subsequent development of a more detailed sentence-level representation (pSTG). These results provide further support for a cascaded interactive-activation account of sentence reading.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224001003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当简短地呈现一连串书面单词,并要求参与者在提示后的位置只识别出一个单词时,如果该单词是以语法正确的顺序呈现,则识别单词的准确率要高于以不符合语法的顺序呈现的单词。这种句子优势效应在多项行为学研究和两项脑电图调查中都有报道。综合来看,这些研究结果都支持这样的假设,即句子优势效应主要是由通过部分单词识别过程快速获取句子级表征所驱动的,这种识别过程在多个单词上并行运作。在这里,我们使用脑电波检查了书面句子加工早期阶段所涉及的神经结构,并进一步明确了所涉及的不同过程的时间。随着时间的推移,源活动显示出语法与非语法的差异,首先在左侧额叶下回(IFG:321-406 ms),然后在左侧颞叶前回(ATL:466-531 ms),最后在左侧 IFG(549-602 ms)和左侧颞叶后上回(pSTG:553-622 ms)。我们将早期 IFG 的活动解释为反映了句子级表征(包括句法)自下而上的快速激活,这种激活是通过部分并行的单词处理实现的。ATL 和 pSTG 的后续活动被认为反映了这些句子级表征对正在进行的基于单词的语义激活(ATL)的限制,以及更详细的句子级表征(pSTG)的后续发展。这些结果进一步支持了句子阅读的级联互动激活理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentence superiority in the reading brain

When a sequence of written words is briefly presented and participants are asked to identify just one word at a post-cued location, then word identification accuracy is higher when the word is presented in a grammatically correct sequence compared with an ungrammatical sequence. This sentence superiority effect has been reported in several behavioral studies and two EEG investigations. Taken together, the results of these studies support the hypothesis that the sentence superiority effect is primarily driven by rapid access to a sentence-level representation via partial word identification processes that operate in parallel over several words. Here we used MEG to examine the neural structures involved in this early stage of written sentence processing, and to further specify the timing of the different processes involved. Source activities over time showed grammatical vs. ungrammatical differences first in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG: 321–406 ms), then the left anterior temporal lobe (ATL: 466–531 ms), and finally in both left IFG (549–602 ms) and left posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG: 553–622 ms). We interpret the early IFG activity as reflecting the rapid bottom-up activation of sentence-level representations, including syntax, enabled by partly parallel word processing. Subsequent activity in ATL and pSTG is thought to reflect the constraints imposed by such sentence-level representations on on-going word-based semantic activation (ATL), and the subsequent development of a more detailed sentence-level representation (pSTG). These results provide further support for a cascaded interactive-activation account of sentence reading.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信