{"title":"通过 MicroXRF 成像检测低熟料工程水泥基复合材料的抗硫酸盐性能","authors":"Connor Szeto, Kimberly E. Kurtis","doi":"10.1111/jmi.13303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are a class of high-performing fibre-reinforced cementitious materials recognised for their increased ductility and durability compared to conventional cement-based materials, owing to their autogenously controlled tight crack widths, even when subjected to high strains. To reduce ECC's environmental impact, this research examines the use of a low-clinker binder − limestone-calcined clay cement (LC3) − as an alternative to portland cement (PC), along with fly ash to further reduce the clinker proportion and the embodied CO<sub>2</sub> of the formulations. In conventional concrete, LC3 hydrates to a denser microstructure resulting from the synergistic reaction between limestone and calcined clay. At the lower water contents typical of ECC and with the presence of fly ash, the influence of the binder composition on the microstructure is difficult to anticipate.</p><p>To examine the influence of these compositional variables on microstructure, permeability and durability, the sulphate resistance of LC3-based ECC is explored. Specifically, the ECC-LC3 blends are designed with high clinker replacement rate of 75% by mass of binder and contain either conventional fly ash or reclaimed fly ash at 50% by mass of binder. Expansion of ECC-LC3 samples subjected to standard sodium sulphate test conditions was measured up to 12 months and the depth of penetration of sulphates into the ECC-LC3 of varying compositions was quantified using micro-X-Ray Fluorescence (microXRF) imaging and modelling. The expansion results show that the ECC-LC3 formulations performed better than the PC samples and can provide adequate resistance to external sulphate attack, even when reclaimed fly ashes are used in place of the conventional ash. In addition, the shallow penetration of sulphate into these cementitious composites demonstrates the low diffusion coefficients values that were determined using the quantitative data from MicroXRF imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":16484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microscopy","volume":"294 2","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmi.13303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sulphate resistance of low-clinker engineered cementitious composites examined by MicroXRF imaging\",\"authors\":\"Connor Szeto, Kimberly E. Kurtis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmi.13303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are a class of high-performing fibre-reinforced cementitious materials recognised for their increased ductility and durability compared to conventional cement-based materials, owing to their autogenously controlled tight crack widths, even when subjected to high strains. To reduce ECC's environmental impact, this research examines the use of a low-clinker binder − limestone-calcined clay cement (LC3) − as an alternative to portland cement (PC), along with fly ash to further reduce the clinker proportion and the embodied CO<sub>2</sub> of the formulations. In conventional concrete, LC3 hydrates to a denser microstructure resulting from the synergistic reaction between limestone and calcined clay. At the lower water contents typical of ECC and with the presence of fly ash, the influence of the binder composition on the microstructure is difficult to anticipate.</p><p>To examine the influence of these compositional variables on microstructure, permeability and durability, the sulphate resistance of LC3-based ECC is explored. Specifically, the ECC-LC3 blends are designed with high clinker replacement rate of 75% by mass of binder and contain either conventional fly ash or reclaimed fly ash at 50% by mass of binder. Expansion of ECC-LC3 samples subjected to standard sodium sulphate test conditions was measured up to 12 months and the depth of penetration of sulphates into the ECC-LC3 of varying compositions was quantified using micro-X-Ray Fluorescence (microXRF) imaging and modelling. The expansion results show that the ECC-LC3 formulations performed better than the PC samples and can provide adequate resistance to external sulphate attack, even when reclaimed fly ashes are used in place of the conventional ash. In addition, the shallow penetration of sulphate into these cementitious composites demonstrates the low diffusion coefficients values that were determined using the quantitative data from MicroXRF imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"volume\":\"294 2\",\"pages\":\"239-250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmi.13303\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.13303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microscopy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmi.13303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sulphate resistance of low-clinker engineered cementitious composites examined by MicroXRF imaging
Engineered cementitious composites (ECC) are a class of high-performing fibre-reinforced cementitious materials recognised for their increased ductility and durability compared to conventional cement-based materials, owing to their autogenously controlled tight crack widths, even when subjected to high strains. To reduce ECC's environmental impact, this research examines the use of a low-clinker binder − limestone-calcined clay cement (LC3) − as an alternative to portland cement (PC), along with fly ash to further reduce the clinker proportion and the embodied CO2 of the formulations. In conventional concrete, LC3 hydrates to a denser microstructure resulting from the synergistic reaction between limestone and calcined clay. At the lower water contents typical of ECC and with the presence of fly ash, the influence of the binder composition on the microstructure is difficult to anticipate.
To examine the influence of these compositional variables on microstructure, permeability and durability, the sulphate resistance of LC3-based ECC is explored. Specifically, the ECC-LC3 blends are designed with high clinker replacement rate of 75% by mass of binder and contain either conventional fly ash or reclaimed fly ash at 50% by mass of binder. Expansion of ECC-LC3 samples subjected to standard sodium sulphate test conditions was measured up to 12 months and the depth of penetration of sulphates into the ECC-LC3 of varying compositions was quantified using micro-X-Ray Fluorescence (microXRF) imaging and modelling. The expansion results show that the ECC-LC3 formulations performed better than the PC samples and can provide adequate resistance to external sulphate attack, even when reclaimed fly ashes are used in place of the conventional ash. In addition, the shallow penetration of sulphate into these cementitious composites demonstrates the low diffusion coefficients values that were determined using the quantitative data from MicroXRF imaging.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microscopy is the oldest journal dedicated to the science of microscopy and the only peer-reviewed publication of the Royal Microscopical Society. It publishes papers that report on the very latest developments in microscopy such as advances in microscopy techniques or novel areas of application. The Journal does not seek to publish routine applications of microscopy or specimen preparation even though the submission may otherwise have a high scientific merit.
The scope covers research in the physical and biological sciences and covers imaging methods using light, electrons, X-rays and other radiations as well as atomic force and near field techniques. Interdisciplinary research is welcome. Papers pertaining to microscopy are also welcomed on optical theory, spectroscopy, novel specimen preparation and manipulation methods and image recording, processing and analysis including dynamic analysis of living specimens.
Publication types include full papers, hot topic fast tracked communications and review articles. Authors considering submitting a review article should contact the editorial office first.