日本 75 岁及以上社区老年人使用催眠药或镇静剂的安全性概况:倾向匹配队列回顾性研究

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nobuhiro Handa, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Seigo Mitsutake, Koki Ono, Masahiro Akishita
{"title":"日本 75 岁及以上社区老年人使用催眠药或镇静剂的安全性概况:倾向匹配队列回顾性研究","authors":"Nobuhiro Handa,&nbsp;Tatsuro Ishizaki,&nbsp;Seigo Mitsutake,&nbsp;Koki Ono,&nbsp;Masahiro Akishita","doi":"10.1002/gps.6085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of the study is to assess if daily use of hypnotics increases mortality, aspiration pneumonia and hip fracture among relatively healthy individuals aged 75 years or older who lead independent lives in the community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method and Patients</h3>\n \n <p>Of the adults aged 75 years or older residing in Hokkaido prefecture of Japan (<i>n</i> = 705,538), those who did not meet several exclusion criteria were eligible for generating propensity score-matched cohorts (<i>n</i> = 214,723). Exclusion criteria included co-prescribed medications acting on the central nervous system, diagnoses of malignant neoplasm, dementia, depression, etc. We compared 33,095 participants who were prescribed hypnotics for daily use (hypnotic group) with a propensity score-matched cohort without a prescription (control group). Participants were followed for more than 42 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the 42-month follow-up period, the incidence of the three outcome measures in the hypnotics group was significantly higher than that in the control group (aspiration pneumonia <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, hip fracture <i>p</i> = 0.007, and all-cause mortality <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analyses utilizing inverse probability weighting demonstrated hazard ratios of 1.083 [1.023–1.146] for mortality, 1.117 [1.014–1.230] for aspiration pneumonia, and 1.720 [1.559–1.897] for hip fracture. Meanwhile, the attribute risk differences were 2.7, 1.5, and 1.0 per 1000 patient-years, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although daily use of hypnotics increased the risk of three events, their attribute risk differences were fewer than 3.0 per 1000 patient-years. The results will help provide guidance on whether it is reasonable to prescribe hypnotics to geriatric population aged 75 or older leading independent lives in the community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical trial registration</h3>\n \n <p>UMIN-CTR UMIN000048398.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety profile of hypnotics or sedatives on community-dwelling older adults aged 75 or older in Japan: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nobuhiro Handa,&nbsp;Tatsuro Ishizaki,&nbsp;Seigo Mitsutake,&nbsp;Koki Ono,&nbsp;Masahiro Akishita\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gps.6085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of the study is to assess if daily use of hypnotics increases mortality, aspiration pneumonia and hip fracture among relatively healthy individuals aged 75 years or older who lead independent lives in the community.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method and Patients</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the adults aged 75 years or older residing in Hokkaido prefecture of Japan (<i>n</i> = 705,538), those who did not meet several exclusion criteria were eligible for generating propensity score-matched cohorts (<i>n</i> = 214,723). Exclusion criteria included co-prescribed medications acting on the central nervous system, diagnoses of malignant neoplasm, dementia, depression, etc. We compared 33,095 participants who were prescribed hypnotics for daily use (hypnotic group) with a propensity score-matched cohort without a prescription (control group). Participants were followed for more than 42 months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the 42-month follow-up period, the incidence of the three outcome measures in the hypnotics group was significantly higher than that in the control group (aspiration pneumonia <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, hip fracture <i>p</i> = 0.007, and all-cause mortality <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analyses utilizing inverse probability weighting demonstrated hazard ratios of 1.083 [1.023–1.146] for mortality, 1.117 [1.014–1.230] for aspiration pneumonia, and 1.720 [1.559–1.897] for hip fracture. Meanwhile, the attribute risk differences were 2.7, 1.5, and 1.0 per 1000 patient-years, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although daily use of hypnotics increased the risk of three events, their attribute risk differences were fewer than 3.0 per 1000 patient-years. The results will help provide guidance on whether it is reasonable to prescribe hypnotics to geriatric population aged 75 or older leading independent lives in the community.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical trial registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>UMIN-CTR UMIN000048398.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.6085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的 评估在社区独立生活的 75 岁或以上相对健康的人群中,每天使用催眠药是否会增加死亡率、吸入性肺炎和髋部骨折。 方法和患者 在居住在日本北海道的 75 岁或以上成年人(n = 705,538 人)中,不符合几项排除标准的人有资格生成倾向得分匹配队列(n = 214,723 人)。排除标准包括同时服用作用于中枢神经系统的药物、诊断为恶性肿瘤、痴呆症、抑郁症等。我们对 33,095 名开具了日常使用催眠药处方的参与者(催眠药组)与未开具处方的倾向得分匹配组群(对照组)进行了比较。我们对参与者进行了超过 42 个月的随访。 结果 在 42 个月的随访期间,催眠药组的三项结果指标的发生率明显高于对照组(吸入性肺炎 p < 0.001、髋部骨折 p = 0.007 和全因死亡率 p < 0.001)。利用反概率加权法进行的敏感性分析表明,死亡率的危险比为 1.083 [1.023-1.146],吸入性肺炎的危险比为 1.117 [1.014-1.230],髋部骨折的危险比为 1.720 [1.559-1.897]。同时,每 1000 患者年的属性风险差异分别为 2.7、1.5 和 1.0。 结论 虽然每天使用催眠药会增加三种事件的风险,但其属性风险差异低于每 1000 患者年 3.0。这些结果将有助于为在社区中独立生活的 75 岁或 75 岁以上老年人群处方催眠药是否合理提供指导。 临床试验注册号为 UMIN-CTR UMIN000048398。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety profile of hypnotics or sedatives on community-dwelling older adults aged 75 or older in Japan: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort study

Objective

The purpose of the study is to assess if daily use of hypnotics increases mortality, aspiration pneumonia and hip fracture among relatively healthy individuals aged 75 years or older who lead independent lives in the community.

Method and Patients

Of the adults aged 75 years or older residing in Hokkaido prefecture of Japan (n = 705,538), those who did not meet several exclusion criteria were eligible for generating propensity score-matched cohorts (n = 214,723). Exclusion criteria included co-prescribed medications acting on the central nervous system, diagnoses of malignant neoplasm, dementia, depression, etc. We compared 33,095 participants who were prescribed hypnotics for daily use (hypnotic group) with a propensity score-matched cohort without a prescription (control group). Participants were followed for more than 42 months.

Results

During the 42-month follow-up period, the incidence of the three outcome measures in the hypnotics group was significantly higher than that in the control group (aspiration pneumonia p < 0.001, hip fracture p = 0.007, and all-cause mortality p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses utilizing inverse probability weighting demonstrated hazard ratios of 1.083 [1.023–1.146] for mortality, 1.117 [1.014–1.230] for aspiration pneumonia, and 1.720 [1.559–1.897] for hip fracture. Meanwhile, the attribute risk differences were 2.7, 1.5, and 1.0 per 1000 patient-years, respectively.

Conclusions

Although daily use of hypnotics increased the risk of three events, their attribute risk differences were fewer than 3.0 per 1000 patient-years. The results will help provide guidance on whether it is reasonable to prescribe hypnotics to geriatric population aged 75 or older leading independent lives in the community.

Clinical trial registration

UMIN-CTR UMIN000048398.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信