评估用于小型工业(SSI)纺织行业废水处理的钛电极与铝电极的对比情况

Q1 Environmental Science
Sahaya Leenus Sebastian , Parameswari Kalivel , Kavitha Subbiah , M.S. Asath Murphy , Jovitha Jane David , Jegathambal Palanichamy
{"title":"评估用于小型工业(SSI)纺织行业废水处理的钛电极与铝电极的对比情况","authors":"Sahaya Leenus Sebastian ,&nbsp;Parameswari Kalivel ,&nbsp;Kavitha Subbiah ,&nbsp;M.S. Asath Murphy ,&nbsp;Jovitha Jane David ,&nbsp;Jegathambal Palanichamy","doi":"10.1016/j.enmm.2024.100950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the pursuit of efficient and cost-effective textile wastewater treatment, this study compares the performance of titanium and aluminium electrodes in electrocoagulation (EC). Titanium electrodes, renowned for their high corrosion resistance, demonstrated superior colour removal efficiency (CRE) at 98.5 % under optimised conditions 10-minute reaction time and 18 Am<sup>−2</sup> current density. Conversely, aluminium electrodes, while effective, required extended reaction times and higher current densities, achieving a CRE of 97.8 %. The cost analysis favoured titanium electrodes at 2.86 ₹/m3, compared to 51.13 ₹/m3 for aluminium. For safe reuse, treated effluent subjected to activated carbon (AC) filtration, showcasing remarkable dye and metal ion removal efficiencies. The AC filtration proved exceptionally effective, as evident in the ICP-OES results. Post-EC, titanium concentration exceeded limits but was efficiently reduced to 0.001 mg/L after AC treatment, while aluminium concentration decreased significantly. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) removal efficiencies were compared, with titanium electrodes achieving 100 % COD and 62 % BOD removal and aluminium electrodes at 94 % COD and 47 % BOD removal. Comprehensive analytical techniques, including XPS, SEM, EDAX, FTIR, mass spectroscopy, HPLC, and ICP-OES, enhance our understanding of EC and AC mechanisms. The combined EC and AC process not only enhanced water quality but also proved environmentally sustainable, providing an eco-friendly solution for small-scale textile industries in need of efficient effluent treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11716,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing titanium vs. aluminium electrodes for wastewater remediation in the small-scale industries (SSI) textile sector\",\"authors\":\"Sahaya Leenus Sebastian ,&nbsp;Parameswari Kalivel ,&nbsp;Kavitha Subbiah ,&nbsp;M.S. Asath Murphy ,&nbsp;Jovitha Jane David ,&nbsp;Jegathambal Palanichamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enmm.2024.100950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the pursuit of efficient and cost-effective textile wastewater treatment, this study compares the performance of titanium and aluminium electrodes in electrocoagulation (EC). Titanium electrodes, renowned for their high corrosion resistance, demonstrated superior colour removal efficiency (CRE) at 98.5 % under optimised conditions 10-minute reaction time and 18 Am<sup>−2</sup> current density. Conversely, aluminium electrodes, while effective, required extended reaction times and higher current densities, achieving a CRE of 97.8 %. The cost analysis favoured titanium electrodes at 2.86 ₹/m3, compared to 51.13 ₹/m3 for aluminium. For safe reuse, treated effluent subjected to activated carbon (AC) filtration, showcasing remarkable dye and metal ion removal efficiencies. The AC filtration proved exceptionally effective, as evident in the ICP-OES results. Post-EC, titanium concentration exceeded limits but was efficiently reduced to 0.001 mg/L after AC treatment, while aluminium concentration decreased significantly. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) removal efficiencies were compared, with titanium electrodes achieving 100 % COD and 62 % BOD removal and aluminium electrodes at 94 % COD and 47 % BOD removal. Comprehensive analytical techniques, including XPS, SEM, EDAX, FTIR, mass spectroscopy, HPLC, and ICP-OES, enhance our understanding of EC and AC mechanisms. The combined EC and AC process not only enhanced water quality but also proved environmentally sustainable, providing an eco-friendly solution for small-scale textile industries in need of efficient effluent treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215153224000382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215153224000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现高效、经济的纺织废水处理,本研究比较了钛电极和铝电极在电凝(EC)中的性能。钛电极以其高耐腐蚀性而闻名,在 10 分钟反应时间和 18 Am-2 电流密度的优化条件下,钛电极的除色效率(CRE)高达 98.5%。相反,铝电极虽然有效,但需要更长的反应时间和更高的电流密度,CRE 为 97.8%。成本分析显示,钛电极的成本为 2.86 ₹/立方米,而铝电极为 51.13 ₹/立方米。为了安全回用,处理后的污水经过活性炭(AC)过滤,显示出显著的染料和金属离子去除率。从 ICP-OES 的结果来看,活性炭过滤的效果非常明显。经 AC 处理后,钛浓度超标,但有效降低至 0.001 mg/L,而铝浓度则显著下降。比较了化学需氧量(COD)和生物需氧量(BOD)的去除率,钛电极的 COD 去除率为 100%,BOD 去除率为 62%,铝电极的 COD 去除率为 94%,BOD 去除率为 47%。包括 XPS、SEM、EDAX、傅立叶变换红外光谱、质谱、HPLC 和 ICP-OES 在内的综合分析技术加深了我们对导电率和交流电机制的理解。EC 和 AC 组合工艺不仅提高了水质,还证明了环境的可持续性,为需要高效污水处理的小型纺织工业提供了一种生态友好型解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing titanium vs. aluminium electrodes for wastewater remediation in the small-scale industries (SSI) textile sector

Assessing titanium vs. aluminium electrodes for wastewater remediation in the small-scale industries (SSI) textile sector

In the pursuit of efficient and cost-effective textile wastewater treatment, this study compares the performance of titanium and aluminium electrodes in electrocoagulation (EC). Titanium electrodes, renowned for their high corrosion resistance, demonstrated superior colour removal efficiency (CRE) at 98.5 % under optimised conditions 10-minute reaction time and 18 Am−2 current density. Conversely, aluminium electrodes, while effective, required extended reaction times and higher current densities, achieving a CRE of 97.8 %. The cost analysis favoured titanium electrodes at 2.86 ₹/m3, compared to 51.13 ₹/m3 for aluminium. For safe reuse, treated effluent subjected to activated carbon (AC) filtration, showcasing remarkable dye and metal ion removal efficiencies. The AC filtration proved exceptionally effective, as evident in the ICP-OES results. Post-EC, titanium concentration exceeded limits but was efficiently reduced to 0.001 mg/L after AC treatment, while aluminium concentration decreased significantly. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen demand (BOD) removal efficiencies were compared, with titanium electrodes achieving 100 % COD and 62 % BOD removal and aluminium electrodes at 94 % COD and 47 % BOD removal. Comprehensive analytical techniques, including XPS, SEM, EDAX, FTIR, mass spectroscopy, HPLC, and ICP-OES, enhance our understanding of EC and AC mechanisms. The combined EC and AC process not only enhanced water quality but also proved environmentally sustainable, providing an eco-friendly solution for small-scale textile industries in need of efficient effluent treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management is a journal devoted to the publication of peer reviewed original research on environmental nanotechnologies, monitoring studies and management for water, soil , waste and human health samples. Critical review articles, short communications and scientific policy briefs are also welcome. The journal will include all environmental matrices except air. Nanomaterials were suggested as efficient cost-effective and environmental friendly alternative to existing treatment materials, from the standpoints of both resource conservation and environmental remediation. The journal aims to receive papers in the field of nanotechnology covering; Developments of new nanosorbents for: •Groundwater, drinking water and wastewater treatment •Remediation of contaminated sites •Assessment of novel nanotechnologies including sustainability and life cycle implications Monitoring and Management papers should cover the fields of: •Novel analytical methods applied to environmental and health samples •Fate and transport of pollutants in the environment •Case studies covering environmental monitoring and public health •Water and soil prevention and legislation •Industrial and hazardous waste- legislation, characterisation, management practices, minimization, treatment and disposal •Environmental management and remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信