Adam T. Burke , Sander J.J. Leemans , Moe T. Wynn , Wil M.P. van der Aalst , Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede
{"title":"模型展示其质量的机会随机过程模型-对数维度","authors":"Adam T. Burke , Sander J.J. Leemans , Moe T. Wynn , Wil M.P. van der Aalst , Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede","doi":"10.1016/j.is.2024.102382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Process models describe the desired or observed behaviour of organisations. In stochastic process mining, computational analysis of trace data yields process models which describe process paths and their probability of execution. To understand the quality of these models, and to compare them, quantitative quality measures are used.</p><p>This research investigates model comparison empirically, using stochastic process models built from real-life logs. The experimental design collects a large number of models generated randomly and using process discovery techniques. Twenty-five different metrics are taken on these models, using both existing process model metrics and new, exploratory ones. The results are analysed quantitatively, making particular use of principal component analysis.</p><p>Based on this analysis, we suggest three stochastic process model dimensions: adhesion, relevance and simplicity. We also suggest possible metrics for these dimensions, and demonstrate their use on example models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50363,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437924000401/pdfft?md5=6831ca8dc2e3712e67135ed5946d6e27&pid=1-s2.0-S0306437924000401-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A chance for models to show their quality: Stochastic process model-log dimensions\",\"authors\":\"Adam T. Burke , Sander J.J. Leemans , Moe T. Wynn , Wil M.P. van der Aalst , Arthur H.M. ter Hofstede\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.is.2024.102382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Process models describe the desired or observed behaviour of organisations. In stochastic process mining, computational analysis of trace data yields process models which describe process paths and their probability of execution. To understand the quality of these models, and to compare them, quantitative quality measures are used.</p><p>This research investigates model comparison empirically, using stochastic process models built from real-life logs. The experimental design collects a large number of models generated randomly and using process discovery techniques. Twenty-five different metrics are taken on these models, using both existing process model metrics and new, exploratory ones. The results are analysed quantitatively, making particular use of principal component analysis.</p><p>Based on this analysis, we suggest three stochastic process model dimensions: adhesion, relevance and simplicity. We also suggest possible metrics for these dimensions, and demonstrate their use on example models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437924000401/pdfft?md5=6831ca8dc2e3712e67135ed5946d6e27&pid=1-s2.0-S0306437924000401-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437924000401\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437924000401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A chance for models to show their quality: Stochastic process model-log dimensions
Process models describe the desired or observed behaviour of organisations. In stochastic process mining, computational analysis of trace data yields process models which describe process paths and their probability of execution. To understand the quality of these models, and to compare them, quantitative quality measures are used.
This research investigates model comparison empirically, using stochastic process models built from real-life logs. The experimental design collects a large number of models generated randomly and using process discovery techniques. Twenty-five different metrics are taken on these models, using both existing process model metrics and new, exploratory ones. The results are analysed quantitatively, making particular use of principal component analysis.
Based on this analysis, we suggest three stochastic process model dimensions: adhesion, relevance and simplicity. We also suggest possible metrics for these dimensions, and demonstrate their use on example models.
期刊介绍:
Information systems are the software and hardware systems that support data-intensive applications. The journal Information Systems publishes articles concerning the design and implementation of languages, data models, process models, algorithms, software and hardware for information systems.
Subject areas include data management issues as presented in the principal international database conferences (e.g., ACM SIGMOD/PODS, VLDB, ICDE and ICDT/EDBT) as well as data-related issues from the fields of data mining/machine learning, information retrieval coordinated with structured data, internet and cloud data management, business process management, web semantics, visual and audio information systems, scientific computing, and data science. Implementation papers having to do with massively parallel data management, fault tolerance in practice, and special purpose hardware for data-intensive systems are also welcome. Manuscripts from application domains, such as urban informatics, social and natural science, and Internet of Things, are also welcome. All papers should highlight innovative solutions to data management problems such as new data models, performance enhancements, and show how those innovations contribute to the goals of the application.