也门萨那市政府医院麻醉人员用药错误评估

Q2 Nursing
Marzoq Ali Odhah , Abdulnasser Ahmed Haza'a , Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal , Muhammad Sadeq Al-Awar , Abdulfatah Saleh Al-Jaradi , Bandar Al-haguri , Mohammed M Al-Jabri , Taha Mohammed Alashwal
{"title":"也门萨那市政府医院麻醉人员用药错误评估","authors":"Marzoq Ali Odhah ,&nbsp;Abdulnasser Ahmed Haza'a ,&nbsp;Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal ,&nbsp;Muhammad Sadeq Al-Awar ,&nbsp;Abdulfatah Saleh Al-Jaradi ,&nbsp;Bandar Al-haguri ,&nbsp;Mohammed M Al-Jabri ,&nbsp;Taha Mohammed Alashwal","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Medication errors (MEs) frequently occur during the execution and administration of anesthesia and are influenced by several factors, such as the experience of the anesthesia staff, the severity of comorbidities, and the technique used. Without pharmacy approval or referral to other staff, anesthesia staff prepare, administer, and monitor powerful anesthetic drugs. This study aimed to evaluate medication errors made by anesthesia staff members working in government hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen. Methods: A total of 102 anesthesia staff members in government hospitals participated in a descriptive cross-sectional study consistent with the STROBE guidelines was used. The data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire administered during a previous study from March 26th to April 9th, 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 83.3% of the participants were males. A total of 37.3% were aged 25–30 years, 58.8% had 1–5 years of experience, 52.0% had a diploma, and 80.4% were anesthesia technology specialists. In relation to medication errors, 56.9% of them experienced administration errors in their anesthesia practice. There were statistically significant differences in the opinions of preventive measures between anesthesiologists and anesthesia technology specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was a high occurrence of anesthetic medication errors in Sana'a government hospitals. Syringe labeling practices need to be standardized by policymakers, and future studies should concentrate on the factors that encourage reporting errors in nonpunitive cultures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Medication Errors among Anesthesia Staff in Government Hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen\",\"authors\":\"Marzoq Ali Odhah ,&nbsp;Abdulnasser Ahmed Haza'a ,&nbsp;Saddam Ahmed Al-Ahdal ,&nbsp;Muhammad Sadeq Al-Awar ,&nbsp;Abdulfatah Saleh Al-Jaradi ,&nbsp;Bandar Al-haguri ,&nbsp;Mohammed M Al-Jabri ,&nbsp;Taha Mohammed Alashwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcorm.2024.100388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Medication errors (MEs) frequently occur during the execution and administration of anesthesia and are influenced by several factors, such as the experience of the anesthesia staff, the severity of comorbidities, and the technique used. Without pharmacy approval or referral to other staff, anesthesia staff prepare, administer, and monitor powerful anesthetic drugs. This study aimed to evaluate medication errors made by anesthesia staff members working in government hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen. Methods: A total of 102 anesthesia staff members in government hospitals participated in a descriptive cross-sectional study consistent with the STROBE guidelines was used. The data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire administered during a previous study from March 26th to April 9th, 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 83.3% of the participants were males. A total of 37.3% were aged 25–30 years, 58.8% had 1–5 years of experience, 52.0% had a diploma, and 80.4% were anesthesia technology specialists. In relation to medication errors, 56.9% of them experienced administration errors in their anesthesia practice. There were statistically significant differences in the opinions of preventive measures between anesthesiologists and anesthesia technology specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was a high occurrence of anesthetic medication errors in Sana'a government hospitals. Syringe labeling practices need to be standardized by policymakers, and future studies should concentrate on the factors that encourage reporting errors in nonpunitive cultures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603024000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景用药错误(ME)经常发生在麻醉的实施和给药过程中,并受到多种因素的影响,例如麻醉人员的经验、合并症的严重程度以及所使用的技术。麻醉工作人员在未经药房批准或转介给其他工作人员的情况下准备、使用和监控强效麻醉药物。本研究旨在评估在也门萨那市政府医院工作的麻醉人员所犯的用药错误。研究方法共有 102 名政府医院的麻醉工作人员参与了一项描述性横断面研究,该研究符合 STROBE 指南。数据是在 2022 年 3 月 26 日至 4 月 9 日进行的上一次研究中通过自填式问卷收集的。37.3%的参与者年龄在25-30岁之间,58.8%的参与者拥有1-5年的工作经验,52.0%的参与者拥有文凭,80.4%的参与者是麻醉技术专家。在用药错误方面,56.9%的人在麻醉实践中出现过用药错误。麻醉医师和麻醉技术专家对预防措施的看法存在明显差异。政策制定者需要规范注射器标签的做法,未来的研究应集中于在非惩罚性文化中鼓励报告错误的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Medication Errors among Anesthesia Staff in Government Hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen

Background

Medication errors (MEs) frequently occur during the execution and administration of anesthesia and are influenced by several factors, such as the experience of the anesthesia staff, the severity of comorbidities, and the technique used. Without pharmacy approval or referral to other staff, anesthesia staff prepare, administer, and monitor powerful anesthetic drugs. This study aimed to evaluate medication errors made by anesthesia staff members working in government hospitals in Sana'a City, Yemen. Methods: A total of 102 anesthesia staff members in government hospitals participated in a descriptive cross-sectional study consistent with the STROBE guidelines was used. The data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire administered during a previous study from March 26th to April 9th, 2022.

Results

A total of 83.3% of the participants were males. A total of 37.3% were aged 25–30 years, 58.8% had 1–5 years of experience, 52.0% had a diploma, and 80.4% were anesthesia technology specialists. In relation to medication errors, 56.9% of them experienced administration errors in their anesthesia practice. There were statistically significant differences in the opinions of preventive measures between anesthesiologists and anesthesia technology specialists.

Conclusion

There was a high occurrence of anesthetic medication errors in Sana'a government hospitals. Syringe labeling practices need to be standardized by policymakers, and future studies should concentrate on the factors that encourage reporting errors in nonpunitive cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信