Inshirah Sgayer , Tala Barbara , Asal Darwish , Ala Aiob , Lior Lowenstein , Maya Frank Wolf , Marwan Odeh
{"title":"超早产儿(≤32 周)超声胎儿体重的准确性","authors":"Inshirah Sgayer , Tala Barbara , Asal Darwish , Ala Aiob , Lior Lowenstein , Maya Frank Wolf , Marwan Odeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight to predict birthweight in very preterm infants (<32 weeks), and to compare the accuracy of estimated fetal weight (EFW) between those small for gestational age (SGA) and those appropriate for gestational age (AGA).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted of data recorded between January 2010 and March 2023. Included were women with singleton livebirths at 23+0–31+6 weeks who had an EFW within one week from delivery. Mean percentage error, mean absolute percentage error, and underestimation and overestimation rates were calculated. We compared the accuracy of EFW between SGA and AGA infants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 360 women were included. The mean absolute percentage error was 7.8 % (range 0 %<strong>–</strong>68.9 %); for 207 (57.5 %) infants the percentage error was within ±10 %. Overestimation error >10 % was observed in 102 (28.3 %) infants and errors >20 % in 34 (9.4 %). Among infants born in the periviable period (23+0 – 25+6 weeks; <em>N</em> = 56), the mean absolute percentage error was 9.8 % (range: 0 %<strong>–</strong>40.3 %); the value was within ±10 % for only 28 periviable infants (50 %) and exceeded 20 % for 16.1 %. Among SGA compared to AGA infants, the mean absolute percentage error was higher (11.1% vs. 6.6 %, <em>p</em> = 0.035). Overestimation error >10 % was more frequent among SGA than AGA infants (55 (49.1 %) vs. 47 (19.0 %), <em>p</em> < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, SGA status was independently associated with a higher mean percentage error (beta = 0.260, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and an increased risk of an error >10 % (odds ratio = 2.1, 95 % confidence interval 1.2<strong>–</strong>3.5, <em>p</em> = 0.008).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sonographic EFW is limited in assessing very preterm infants, particularly those who are SGA or born during the periviable period. These limitations should be considered regarding impending very preterm births and concerns about abnormal fetal growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 7","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of sonographic fetal weight in very preterm infants (≤32 weeks)\",\"authors\":\"Inshirah Sgayer , Tala Barbara , Asal Darwish , Ala Aiob , Lior Lowenstein , Maya Frank Wolf , Marwan Odeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight to predict birthweight in very preterm infants (<32 weeks), and to compare the accuracy of estimated fetal weight (EFW) between those small for gestational age (SGA) and those appropriate for gestational age (AGA).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted of data recorded between January 2010 and March 2023. Included were women with singleton livebirths at 23+0–31+6 weeks who had an EFW within one week from delivery. Mean percentage error, mean absolute percentage error, and underestimation and overestimation rates were calculated. We compared the accuracy of EFW between SGA and AGA infants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 360 women were included. The mean absolute percentage error was 7.8 % (range 0 %<strong>–</strong>68.9 %); for 207 (57.5 %) infants the percentage error was within ±10 %. Overestimation error >10 % was observed in 102 (28.3 %) infants and errors >20 % in 34 (9.4 %). Among infants born in the periviable period (23+0 – 25+6 weeks; <em>N</em> = 56), the mean absolute percentage error was 9.8 % (range: 0 %<strong>–</strong>40.3 %); the value was within ±10 % for only 28 periviable infants (50 %) and exceeded 20 % for 16.1 %. Among SGA compared to AGA infants, the mean absolute percentage error was higher (11.1% vs. 6.6 %, <em>p</em> = 0.035). Overestimation error >10 % was more frequent among SGA than AGA infants (55 (49.1 %) vs. 47 (19.0 %), <em>p</em> < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, SGA status was independently associated with a higher mean percentage error (beta = 0.260, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and an increased risk of an error >10 % (odds ratio = 2.1, 95 % confidence interval 1.2<strong>–</strong>3.5, <em>p</em> = 0.008).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sonographic EFW is limited in assessing very preterm infants, particularly those who are SGA or born during the periviable period. These limitations should be considered regarding impending very preterm births and concerns about abnormal fetal growth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"53 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 102785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000631\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000631","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The accuracy of sonographic fetal weight in very preterm infants (≤32 weeks)
Objective
To examine the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight to predict birthweight in very preterm infants (<32 weeks), and to compare the accuracy of estimated fetal weight (EFW) between those small for gestational age (SGA) and those appropriate for gestational age (AGA).
Study design
A retrospective study was conducted of data recorded between January 2010 and March 2023. Included were women with singleton livebirths at 23+0–31+6 weeks who had an EFW within one week from delivery. Mean percentage error, mean absolute percentage error, and underestimation and overestimation rates were calculated. We compared the accuracy of EFW between SGA and AGA infants.
Results
In total, 360 women were included. The mean absolute percentage error was 7.8 % (range 0 %–68.9 %); for 207 (57.5 %) infants the percentage error was within ±10 %. Overestimation error >10 % was observed in 102 (28.3 %) infants and errors >20 % in 34 (9.4 %). Among infants born in the periviable period (23+0 – 25+6 weeks; N = 56), the mean absolute percentage error was 9.8 % (range: 0 %–40.3 %); the value was within ±10 % for only 28 periviable infants (50 %) and exceeded 20 % for 16.1 %. Among SGA compared to AGA infants, the mean absolute percentage error was higher (11.1% vs. 6.6 %, p = 0.035). Overestimation error >10 % was more frequent among SGA than AGA infants (55 (49.1 %) vs. 47 (19.0 %), p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, SGA status was independently associated with a higher mean percentage error (beta = 0.260, p < 0.001) and an increased risk of an error >10 % (odds ratio = 2.1, 95 % confidence interval 1.2–3.5, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
Sonographic EFW is limited in assessing very preterm infants, particularly those who are SGA or born during the periviable period. These limitations should be considered regarding impending very preterm births and concerns about abnormal fetal growth.
期刊介绍:
Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF).
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines.
Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.