{"title":"非木材林产品种群的庇护所:普遍性和有效性","authors":"Nwabisa Mjoli, Charlie M. Shackleton","doi":"10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tens of thousands of plant species globally are harvested to varying extents as non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Local populations of many NTFPs face significant pressures from harvesters, often leading to calls for harvesting guidelines to promote sustainable offtakes. However, most studies to determine sustainable harvest levels implicitly assume that the entire population is available to harvesters. Yet, certain areas or portions of particular NTFP populations outside of protected areas may not be open to harvesting because they are in some sort of cultural or spatial refuge. Using a mixed-methods approach we assessed the prevalence and efficacy of refugia for 70 NTFP plant species at seven communal land sites in south-eastern South Africa. Based on reports from local harvesters, approximately 10 % of the 70 species had part of their population in a refuge. For most of these, populations within a refuge showed lower levels of harvesting and were in a better condition than adjacent populations not in a refuge. These results demonstrate that studies assessing the sustainability of harvesting of NTFP populations should account for whether refugia are present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8708,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Ecology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Pages 26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000264/pdfft?md5=ed005aaf50ecc0002ad4f41af0952be7&pid=1-s2.0-S1439179124000264-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refugia for non-timber forest product populations: Prevalence and efficacy\",\"authors\":\"Nwabisa Mjoli, Charlie M. Shackleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tens of thousands of plant species globally are harvested to varying extents as non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Local populations of many NTFPs face significant pressures from harvesters, often leading to calls for harvesting guidelines to promote sustainable offtakes. However, most studies to determine sustainable harvest levels implicitly assume that the entire population is available to harvesters. Yet, certain areas or portions of particular NTFP populations outside of protected areas may not be open to harvesting because they are in some sort of cultural or spatial refuge. Using a mixed-methods approach we assessed the prevalence and efficacy of refugia for 70 NTFP plant species at seven communal land sites in south-eastern South Africa. Based on reports from local harvesters, approximately 10 % of the 70 species had part of their population in a refuge. For most of these, populations within a refuge showed lower levels of harvesting and were in a better condition than adjacent populations not in a refuge. These results demonstrate that studies assessing the sustainability of harvesting of NTFP populations should account for whether refugia are present.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic and Applied Ecology\",\"volume\":\"77 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 26-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000264/pdfft?md5=ed005aaf50ecc0002ad4f41af0952be7&pid=1-s2.0-S1439179124000264-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic and Applied Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000264\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1439179124000264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refugia for non-timber forest product populations: Prevalence and efficacy
Tens of thousands of plant species globally are harvested to varying extents as non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Local populations of many NTFPs face significant pressures from harvesters, often leading to calls for harvesting guidelines to promote sustainable offtakes. However, most studies to determine sustainable harvest levels implicitly assume that the entire population is available to harvesters. Yet, certain areas or portions of particular NTFP populations outside of protected areas may not be open to harvesting because they are in some sort of cultural or spatial refuge. Using a mixed-methods approach we assessed the prevalence and efficacy of refugia for 70 NTFP plant species at seven communal land sites in south-eastern South Africa. Based on reports from local harvesters, approximately 10 % of the 70 species had part of their population in a refuge. For most of these, populations within a refuge showed lower levels of harvesting and were in a better condition than adjacent populations not in a refuge. These results demonstrate that studies assessing the sustainability of harvesting of NTFP populations should account for whether refugia are present.
期刊介绍:
Basic and Applied Ecology provides a forum in which significant advances and ideas can be rapidly communicated to a wide audience. Basic and Applied Ecology publishes original contributions, perspectives and reviews from all areas of basic and applied ecology. Ecologists from all countries are invited to publish ecological research of international interest in its pages. There is no bias with regard to taxon or geographical area.