James Larkin , Shai Mulinari , Piotr Ozieranski , Kevin Lynch , Tom Fahey , Akihiko Ozaki , Frank Moriarty
{"title":"2017 年至 2019 年欧洲医疗器械行业向医疗机构报告的付款情况:一项观察性研究","authors":"James Larkin , Shai Mulinari , Piotr Ozieranski , Kevin Lynch , Tom Fahey , Akihiko Ozaki , Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. <em>MedTech Europe's</em> disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 2","pages":"Article 100865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285/pdfft?md5=66282831ea8d60ac24853633e69387b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000285-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Payments to healthcare organisations reported by the medical device industry in Europe from 2017 to 2019: An observational study\",\"authors\":\"James Larkin , Shai Mulinari , Piotr Ozieranski , Kevin Lynch , Tom Fahey , Akihiko Ozaki , Frank Moriarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. <em>MedTech Europe's</em> disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by <em>MedTech Europe</em>, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285/pdfft?md5=66282831ea8d60ac24853633e69387b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000285-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Payments to healthcare organisations reported by the medical device industry in Europe from 2017 to 2019: An observational study
Objective
Medical device industry payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) can create conflicts of interest which can undermine patient care. One way of addressing this concern is by enhancing transparency of industry financial support to HCOs. MedTech Europe, a medical device trade body, operate a system of disclosure of education payments to European HCOs. This study aimed to characterise payments reported in this database and to evaluate the disclosure system.
Methods
An observational study of education-related payments to HCOs reported by the medical device industry in Europe was conducted. Data was manually extracted from transparentmedtech.eu. The primary outcome variable is the value of the payments, overall, and for each year, payment type, and country. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database was also analysed, using a proforma with 15 measures.
Results
Overall, 116 medical device companies reported education-related payments in 53 European and non-European countries, valuing over €425 million between 2017 and 2019, increasing in value between 2017 and 2019, from €93,798,419 to €175,414,302. Ten countries accounted for 94% of all payments and ten companies accounted for 80% of all payments. The accessibility, availability and quality of the database rated low for six measures, medium for six measures, and high for three measures.
Conclusion
There is a large amount of education-related payments from medical device companies to European HCOs, creating substantial potential for conflicts of interest. MedTech Europe's disclosure system has many shortcomings. A European-wide publicly mandated disclosure system for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industries should be introduced.
Public interest summary
The medical device industry pay healthcare organisations (e.g. hospitals) large amounts of money. Industry states that this money is to help pay for healthcare professionals’ education. However, these payments can have a negative impact on healthcare professionals’ decision-making. This study sought to examine a website run by MedTech Europe, a representative body for the medical device industry, which outlines details of some of these payments (www.transparentmedtech.eu). Our analysis found that between 2017 and 2019 the medical device industry made ‘education’ payments valuing €425 million to healthcare organisations in Europe. We also assessed how comprehensive and user-friendly the database was and found a range of issues. For example, the database is not downloadable and some other important types of payments, such as payments for consultancy, are not included. We concluded that a mandatory database for both the medical device and pharmaceutical industry run by the European Union, would significantly improve transparency.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics