管理机构的影响:拼凑的法医死亡调查系统资源比较

Q1 Social Sciences
Hope M. Smiley-McDonald, Kelly A. Keyes, Sean Wire, Kathryn Greenwell, Nelson A. Santos, Jeri D. Ropero-Miller
{"title":"管理机构的影响:拼凑的法医死亡调查系统资源比较","authors":"Hope M. Smiley-McDonald,&nbsp;Kelly A. Keyes,&nbsp;Sean Wire,&nbsp;Kathryn Greenwell,&nbsp;Nelson A. Santos,&nbsp;Jeri D. Ropero-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the United States, medical examiners and coroners (MECs) fill critical roles within our public health and public safety systems. These professionals are primarily charged with determining the cause and manner of death as they investigate deaths and respond to associated scenes and mass fatalities and can also help identify trends in public health crises through medicolegal death investigations. Despite their instrumental role, they are organized in disparate systems with varying governing structures, functions, staffing, caseload, budget, and access to resources. This paper examines data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroners to evaluate MEC operations in the United States. The findings show that MEC offices’ organizational and operational governance structures greatly influence resources, workloads, and access to information and services. Standalone MEC offices were generally better resourced than those affiliated with law enforcement, public health, forensic science, district attorneys, or other agencies.<sup>1</sup></p></div>","PeriodicalId":36925,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000147/pdfft?md5=c10bf4addae9dc4f285822a6c58bd1a3&pid=1-s2.0-S2589871X24000147-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impacts of governing agency: A comparison of resources in the patchwork of medicolegal death investigation systems\",\"authors\":\"Hope M. Smiley-McDonald,&nbsp;Kelly A. Keyes,&nbsp;Sean Wire,&nbsp;Kathryn Greenwell,&nbsp;Nelson A. Santos,&nbsp;Jeri D. Ropero-Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the United States, medical examiners and coroners (MECs) fill critical roles within our public health and public safety systems. These professionals are primarily charged with determining the cause and manner of death as they investigate deaths and respond to associated scenes and mass fatalities and can also help identify trends in public health crises through medicolegal death investigations. Despite their instrumental role, they are organized in disparate systems with varying governing structures, functions, staffing, caseload, budget, and access to resources. This paper examines data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroners to evaluate MEC operations in the United States. The findings show that MEC offices’ organizational and operational governance structures greatly influence resources, workloads, and access to information and services. Standalone MEC offices were generally better resourced than those affiliated with law enforcement, public health, forensic science, district attorneys, or other agencies.<sup>1</sup></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Science International: Synergy\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000147/pdfft?md5=c10bf4addae9dc4f285822a6c58bd1a3&pid=1-s2.0-S2589871X24000147-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Science International: Synergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Synergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,法医和验尸官在我们的公共卫生和公共安全系统中发挥着至关重要的作用。这些专业人员在调查死亡事件、应对相关现场和大规模死亡事件时,主要负责确定死亡原因和方式,还可以通过法医死亡调查帮助确定公共卫生危机的趋势。尽管它们发挥着重要作用,但其组织系统却各不相同,管理结构、职能、人员配备、案件量、预算和资源获取途径也各不相同。本文研究了 2018 年法医和验尸官普查的数据,以评估美国 MEC 的运作情况。研究结果表明,MEC 办事处的组织和运营治理结构在很大程度上影响着资源、工作量以及信息和服务的获取。与隶属于执法、公共卫生、法医学、地方检察官或其他机构的办公室相比,独立的 MEC 办公室通常拥有更好的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impacts of governing agency: A comparison of resources in the patchwork of medicolegal death investigation systems

In the United States, medical examiners and coroners (MECs) fill critical roles within our public health and public safety systems. These professionals are primarily charged with determining the cause and manner of death as they investigate deaths and respond to associated scenes and mass fatalities and can also help identify trends in public health crises through medicolegal death investigations. Despite their instrumental role, they are organized in disparate systems with varying governing structures, functions, staffing, caseload, budget, and access to resources. This paper examines data from the 2018 Census of Medical Examiner and Coroners to evaluate MEC operations in the United States. The findings show that MEC offices’ organizational and operational governance structures greatly influence resources, workloads, and access to information and services. Standalone MEC offices were generally better resourced than those affiliated with law enforcement, public health, forensic science, district attorneys, or other agencies.1

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信