缩短生产性投资之路:马拉维投入品交易会和现金转移的证据

IF 5.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Shilpa Aggarwal , Dahyeon Jeong , Naresh Kumar , David Sungho Park , Jonathan Robinson , Alan Spearot
{"title":"缩短生产性投资之路:马拉维投入品交易会和现金转移的证据","authors":"Shilpa Aggarwal ,&nbsp;Dahyeon Jeong ,&nbsp;Naresh Kumar ,&nbsp;David Sungho Park ,&nbsp;Jonathan Robinson ,&nbsp;Alan Spearot","doi":"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While cash transfers consistently show large effects on immediate outcomes like consumption, limited access to markets may mute their impact on productive investment. In an experiment in Malawi, we cross-cut cash transfers with an “input fair”, designed to reduce transport costs to access agricultural inputs. Cash alone increases investment by 27%, while the joint provision of cash and the input fair increases investment by about 40%; thus, the incremental effect of the input fair is equivalent to about a 50% increase compared to the effect of cash alone. Input fairs alone were ineffective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Economics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103288"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shortening the path to productive investment: Evidence from input fairs and cash transfers in Malawi\",\"authors\":\"Shilpa Aggarwal ,&nbsp;Dahyeon Jeong ,&nbsp;Naresh Kumar ,&nbsp;David Sungho Park ,&nbsp;Jonathan Robinson ,&nbsp;Alan Spearot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdeveco.2024.103288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While cash transfers consistently show large effects on immediate outcomes like consumption, limited access to markets may mute their impact on productive investment. In an experiment in Malawi, we cross-cut cash transfers with an “input fair”, designed to reduce transport costs to access agricultural inputs. Cash alone increases investment by 27%, while the joint provision of cash and the input fair increases investment by about 40%; thus, the incremental effect of the input fair is equivalent to about a 50% increase compared to the effect of cash alone. Input fairs alone were ineffective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Economics\",\"volume\":\"170 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000373\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387824000373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然现金转移一直对消费等直接结果产生巨大影响,但有限的市场准入可能会削弱其对生产性投资的影响。在马拉维的一项实验中,我们将现金转移与旨在降低获得农业投入的运输成本的 "投入集市 "交叉进行。单独提供现金可使投资增加 27%,而联合提供现金和投入集市可使投资增加约 40%;因此,与单独提供现金的效果相比,投入集市的增量效果相当于增加约 50%。单独的投入公平没有效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shortening the path to productive investment: Evidence from input fairs and cash transfers in Malawi

While cash transfers consistently show large effects on immediate outcomes like consumption, limited access to markets may mute their impact on productive investment. In an experiment in Malawi, we cross-cut cash transfers with an “input fair”, designed to reduce transport costs to access agricultural inputs. Cash alone increases investment by 27%, while the joint provision of cash and the input fair increases investment by about 40%; thus, the incremental effect of the input fair is equivalent to about a 50% increase compared to the effect of cash alone. Input fairs alone were ineffective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Development Economics publishes papers relating to all aspects of economic development - from immediate policy concerns to structural problems of underdevelopment. The emphasis is on quantitative or analytical work, which is relevant as well as intellectually stimulating.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信