社区复原力:对包容性战略和可扩展解决方案的多学科探索

Megan Boston , Desmond Bernie , Liz Brogden , Alan Forster , Laurent Galbrun , Leigh-Anne Hepburn , Taibat Lawanson , Jolanda Morkel
{"title":"社区复原力:对包容性战略和可扩展解决方案的多学科探索","authors":"Megan Boston ,&nbsp;Desmond Bernie ,&nbsp;Liz Brogden ,&nbsp;Alan Forster ,&nbsp;Laurent Galbrun ,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Hepburn ,&nbsp;Taibat Lawanson ,&nbsp;Jolanda Morkel","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper evaluates literature across multiple disciplines and stakeholder types to identify commonalities and contradictions in definitions for community resilience. It aims to support cross-disciplinary discourse to build an interdisciplinary understanding of community resilience. This work identifies the differences between mono-, multi-, inter-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to inform community resilience strategies in academic and practice-based contexts.</p><p>Four themes for community resilience were identified through a review of cross-disciplinary literature. These include (1) diverse yet convergent definitions of community resilience and the evolution from equilibrium to adaptation to transformation; (2) equitable and inclusive strategies for the development of community resilience initiatives; (3) when and at what scale strategies should be implemented; and (4) community resilience as a process or an outcome.</p><p>This work is valuable to those seeking to familiarise themselves with the concept of community resilience, including educators who deliver courses on community resilience and policy-makers. It is novel in that it presents an interdisciplinary framework for navigating the community resilience discourse beyond individual professional boundaries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 114-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000085/pdfft?md5=176404ccc275501ee25a4a186efcc8b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000085-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community resilience: A multidisciplinary exploration for inclusive strategies and scalable solutions\",\"authors\":\"Megan Boston ,&nbsp;Desmond Bernie ,&nbsp;Liz Brogden ,&nbsp;Alan Forster ,&nbsp;Laurent Galbrun ,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Hepburn ,&nbsp;Taibat Lawanson ,&nbsp;Jolanda Morkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper evaluates literature across multiple disciplines and stakeholder types to identify commonalities and contradictions in definitions for community resilience. It aims to support cross-disciplinary discourse to build an interdisciplinary understanding of community resilience. This work identifies the differences between mono-, multi-, inter-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to inform community resilience strategies in academic and practice-based contexts.</p><p>Four themes for community resilience were identified through a review of cross-disciplinary literature. These include (1) diverse yet convergent definitions of community resilience and the evolution from equilibrium to adaptation to transformation; (2) equitable and inclusive strategies for the development of community resilience initiatives; (3) when and at what scale strategies should be implemented; and (4) community resilience as a process or an outcome.</p><p>This work is valuable to those seeking to familiarise themselves with the concept of community resilience, including educators who deliver courses on community resilience and policy-makers. It is novel in that it presents an interdisciplinary framework for navigating the community resilience discourse beyond individual professional boundaries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resilient Cities and Structures\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 114-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000085/pdfft?md5=176404ccc275501ee25a4a186efcc8b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2772741624000085-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resilient Cities and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resilient Cities and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741624000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了跨学科和利益相关者类型的文献,以确定社区恢复力定义中的共性和矛盾。其目的是支持跨学科讨论,以建立对社区恢复力的跨学科理解。通过对跨学科文献的综述,确定了社区抗灾能力的四个主题。这些主题包括:(1) 社区抗灾能力的不同但趋同的定义,以及从平衡到适应再到转变的演变过程;(2) 制定社区抗灾能力倡议的公平和包容性战略;(3) 何时以及在何种规模上实施战略;(4) 社区抗灾能力是一个过程还是一个结果。这部著作的新颖之处在于,它提出了一个跨学科框架,用于超越个人的专业界限,引导社区抗灾能力的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community resilience: A multidisciplinary exploration for inclusive strategies and scalable solutions

This paper evaluates literature across multiple disciplines and stakeholder types to identify commonalities and contradictions in definitions for community resilience. It aims to support cross-disciplinary discourse to build an interdisciplinary understanding of community resilience. This work identifies the differences between mono-, multi-, inter-, and cross-disciplinary approaches to inform community resilience strategies in academic and practice-based contexts.

Four themes for community resilience were identified through a review of cross-disciplinary literature. These include (1) diverse yet convergent definitions of community resilience and the evolution from equilibrium to adaptation to transformation; (2) equitable and inclusive strategies for the development of community resilience initiatives; (3) when and at what scale strategies should be implemented; and (4) community resilience as a process or an outcome.

This work is valuable to those seeking to familiarise themselves with the concept of community resilience, including educators who deliver courses on community resilience and policy-makers. It is novel in that it presents an interdisciplinary framework for navigating the community resilience discourse beyond individual professional boundaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信