COVID-19 启动后,一家三级眼科护理中心的职业倦怠明显增加

Warren W Pan, Karolina Leziak, Jennifer S Weizer, Denise A John, Amy D Zhang
{"title":"COVID-19 启动后,一家三级眼科护理中心的职业倦怠明显增加","authors":"Warren W Pan,&nbsp;Karolina Leziak,&nbsp;Jennifer S Weizer,&nbsp;Denise A John,&nbsp;Amy D Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To better understand the burnout rates among ophthalmologists before and after the start of COVID-19 in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study integrating cross-sectional data from annual faculty surveys conducted in 2018, 2021, and 2022, plus a separate, single-item burnout survey administered prospectively in 2022 and repeated six months later to faculty members, trainees, and staff members.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>University of Michigan faculty, trainees, and staff at a tertiary eye care center (Kellogg Eye Center), and Women in Ophthalmology (WIO) members.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A validated, single-item burnout assessment on a 5-point scale was electronically distributed to WIO and Kellogg physicians and staff in late 2022. Links to wellness resources were provided at submission. The survey was redistributed after six months, with an added question on resource utilization. Responses were compared to Kellogg's Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021, and 2022, which included the same single-item burnout measure. All responses to the single-item scale were dichotomized based on presence of burnout. Self-reported wellness resource utilization was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>Self-reported measures of burnout.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 73, 91, and 81 ophthalmologists on faculty completed the Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021 and 2022, representing a response rate of 64 %, 79 %, and 69 %. The response rate for the single-item survey sent to Kellogg among ophthalmologists in 2022 was 43 %. The Kellogg ophthalmologist burnout rate in 2018 was 39.7 % and was significantly higher in 2021 at 70.3 % (<em>p</em> = 0.0001), and in 2022 at 70.4 %. Burnout rates amongst WIO members and Kellogg ophthalmologists were similar. While no respondents to the single-item survey in 2018 reported the most severe burnout score, in 2021, responses shifted to include the most severe answers. Some respondents reported utilizing wellness resources, follow-up results did not demonstrate significantly decreased burnout in any group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In 2018, ophthalmologists’ burnout rates at this academic eye center were in line with national averages. However, a significant increase in burnout was seen in 2021 onwards, with a shift towards more severe burnout responses. Though numerous factors may account for these changes, COVID-19 may be a significant contributor. Future work may focus on specific contributors to increased rates of burnout amongst ophthalmologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000091/pdfft?md5=7279cc92b3aaf878a91f78795d805ea9&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000091-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burnout at a tertiary eye care center significantly higher after the start of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Warren W Pan,&nbsp;Karolina Leziak,&nbsp;Jennifer S Weizer,&nbsp;Denise A John,&nbsp;Amy D Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To better understand the burnout rates among ophthalmologists before and after the start of COVID-19 in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective observational study integrating cross-sectional data from annual faculty surveys conducted in 2018, 2021, and 2022, plus a separate, single-item burnout survey administered prospectively in 2022 and repeated six months later to faculty members, trainees, and staff members.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>University of Michigan faculty, trainees, and staff at a tertiary eye care center (Kellogg Eye Center), and Women in Ophthalmology (WIO) members.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A validated, single-item burnout assessment on a 5-point scale was electronically distributed to WIO and Kellogg physicians and staff in late 2022. Links to wellness resources were provided at submission. The survey was redistributed after six months, with an added question on resource utilization. Responses were compared to Kellogg's Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021, and 2022, which included the same single-item burnout measure. All responses to the single-item scale were dichotomized based on presence of burnout. Self-reported wellness resource utilization was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>Self-reported measures of burnout.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 73, 91, and 81 ophthalmologists on faculty completed the Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021 and 2022, representing a response rate of 64 %, 79 %, and 69 %. The response rate for the single-item survey sent to Kellogg among ophthalmologists in 2022 was 43 %. The Kellogg ophthalmologist burnout rate in 2018 was 39.7 % and was significantly higher in 2021 at 70.3 % (<em>p</em> = 0.0001), and in 2022 at 70.4 %. Burnout rates amongst WIO members and Kellogg ophthalmologists were similar. While no respondents to the single-item survey in 2018 reported the most severe burnout score, in 2021, responses shifted to include the most severe answers. Some respondents reported utilizing wellness resources, follow-up results did not demonstrate significantly decreased burnout in any group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In 2018, ophthalmologists’ burnout rates at this academic eye center were in line with national averages. However, a significant increase in burnout was seen in 2021 onwards, with a shift towards more severe burnout responses. Though numerous factors may account for these changes, COVID-19 may be a significant contributor. Future work may focus on specific contributors to increased rates of burnout amongst ophthalmologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000091/pdfft?md5=7279cc92b3aaf878a91f78795d805ea9&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000091-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的更好地了解美国COVID-19开始实施前后眼科医生的职业倦怠率.设计回顾性观察研究,整合了2018年、2021年和2022年进行的年度教职员工调查的横断面数据,以及2022年进行的单独的单项职业倦怠调查,并在6个月后对教职员工、受训人员和工作人员进行重复调查.方法密歇根大学三级眼科医疗中心(凯洛格眼科中心)的教职员工、受训人员和工作人员以及眼科妇女组织(WIO)成员进行职业倦怠调查.研究对象密歇根大学眼科三级护理中心(凯洛格眼科中心)的教职员工、受训人员和工作人员,以及眼科妇女组织(WIO)成员。方法在2022年下半年以电子方式向WIO和凯洛格的医生和工作人员分发经过验证的单项5分制职业倦怠评估表。提交时提供了健康资源链接。调查表在六个月后重新分发,并增加了一个关于资源利用率的问题。调查回复与凯洛格在 2018 年、2021 年和 2022 年进行的年度教职员工调查进行了比较,其中包括相同的单项倦怠度量表。所有对单项量表的回答都根据是否存在职业倦怠进行了二分。结果2018年、2021年和2022年,共有73名、91名和81名眼科医生完成了年度教职员工调查,回复率分别为64%、79%和69%。2022 年,眼科医生对发送到 Kellogg 的单项调查的回复率为 43%。2018年凯洛格眼科医生的职业倦怠率为39.7%,2021年为70.3%(p = 0.0001),2022年为70.4%,明显高于2018年。WIO成员和凯洛格眼科医生的职业倦怠率相似。虽然在 2018 年的单项调查中没有受访者报告最严重的职业倦怠得分,但在 2021 年,受访者的回答转变为包括最严重的答案。一些受访者报告利用了健康资源,但后续结果并未显示任何群体的职业倦怠程度显著下降。结论2018年,该学术眼科中心的眼科医生职业倦怠率与全国平均水平一致。然而,从 2021 年开始,倦怠感明显增加,并向更严重的倦怠反应转变。虽然造成这些变化的因素很多,但 COVID-19 可能是其中一个重要因素。未来的工作可能会重点关注导致眼科医生职业倦怠率增加的具体因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burnout at a tertiary eye care center significantly higher after the start of COVID-19

Objective

To better understand the burnout rates among ophthalmologists before and after the start of COVID-19 in the United States.

Design

Retrospective observational study integrating cross-sectional data from annual faculty surveys conducted in 2018, 2021, and 2022, plus a separate, single-item burnout survey administered prospectively in 2022 and repeated six months later to faculty members, trainees, and staff members.

Subjects

University of Michigan faculty, trainees, and staff at a tertiary eye care center (Kellogg Eye Center), and Women in Ophthalmology (WIO) members.

Methods

A validated, single-item burnout assessment on a 5-point scale was electronically distributed to WIO and Kellogg physicians and staff in late 2022. Links to wellness resources were provided at submission. The survey was redistributed after six months, with an added question on resource utilization. Responses were compared to Kellogg's Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021, and 2022, which included the same single-item burnout measure. All responses to the single-item scale were dichotomized based on presence of burnout. Self-reported wellness resource utilization was also assessed.

Outcomes

Self-reported measures of burnout.

Results

A total of 73, 91, and 81 ophthalmologists on faculty completed the Annual Faculty Survey in 2018, 2021 and 2022, representing a response rate of 64 %, 79 %, and 69 %. The response rate for the single-item survey sent to Kellogg among ophthalmologists in 2022 was 43 %. The Kellogg ophthalmologist burnout rate in 2018 was 39.7 % and was significantly higher in 2021 at 70.3 % (p = 0.0001), and in 2022 at 70.4 %. Burnout rates amongst WIO members and Kellogg ophthalmologists were similar. While no respondents to the single-item survey in 2018 reported the most severe burnout score, in 2021, responses shifted to include the most severe answers. Some respondents reported utilizing wellness resources, follow-up results did not demonstrate significantly decreased burnout in any group.

Conclusions

In 2018, ophthalmologists’ burnout rates at this academic eye center were in line with national averages. However, a significant increase in burnout was seen in 2021 onwards, with a shift towards more severe burnout responses. Though numerous factors may account for these changes, COVID-19 may be a significant contributor. Future work may focus on specific contributors to increased rates of burnout amongst ophthalmologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信