减少肩部手术中痤疮切迹杆菌感染的外用制剂:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络 Meta 分析

Yash Sewpaul, Richard Huynh, Brook Leung, Harry Alcock, Sandeep Krishan Nayar, Mustafa S. Rashid
{"title":"减少肩部手术中痤疮切迹杆菌感染的外用制剂:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络 Meta 分析","authors":"Yash Sewpaul, Richard Huynh, Brook Leung, Harry Alcock, Sandeep Krishan Nayar, Mustafa S. Rashid","doi":"10.1177/03635465231223877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Cutibacterium acnes ( C acnes) is a commensal skin bacterium, primarily found in sebaceous glands and hair follicles, with a high prevalence in the shoulder region. It is the most common pathogenic organism in prosthetic joint infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Because of its low virulence, its diagnosis remains difficult.Purpose:To evaluate the relative effects of topical preparations in reducing C acnes in shoulder surgery.Study Design:Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any form of topical preparation in arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery were included. The primary outcome was a reduction in the number of positive C acnes cultures. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to the application of topical preparations. We performed a network meta-analysis to facilitate simultaneous comparisons between multiple preparations across studies. We calculated differences between preparations using odds ratios and their 95% CIs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.Results:The search yielded 17 RCTs (1350 patients), of which 9 were suitable for the network meta-analysis (775 patients). Overall, 2 RCTs were deemed as having a low risk of bias, and 15 raised “some concerns” of bias. Preparations included benzoyl peroxide (BPO), BPO combined with clindamycin, chlorhexidine gluconate, hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and water with soap. Only BPO resulted in significantly lower odds of a positive C acnes culture compared with placebo or soap and water (odds ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.36]). There was no statistically significant difference with all other topical preparations. The only adverse events were skin irritation from BPO and chlorhexidine gluconate in a small number of reported cases.Conclusion:BPO was the most effective topical agent in reducing the prevalence of C acnes in shoulder surgery. These results were limited by a combination of indirect and direct data. Future studies should focus on establishing the optimal frequency and duration of preoperative BPO to further reduce the burden of C acnes.Registration:CRD42022310312 (PROSPERO).","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical Preparations for Reducing Cutibacterium acnes Infections in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Yash Sewpaul, Richard Huynh, Brook Leung, Harry Alcock, Sandeep Krishan Nayar, Mustafa S. Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465231223877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Cutibacterium acnes ( C acnes) is a commensal skin bacterium, primarily found in sebaceous glands and hair follicles, with a high prevalence in the shoulder region. It is the most common pathogenic organism in prosthetic joint infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Because of its low virulence, its diagnosis remains difficult.Purpose:To evaluate the relative effects of topical preparations in reducing C acnes in shoulder surgery.Study Design:Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any form of topical preparation in arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery were included. The primary outcome was a reduction in the number of positive C acnes cultures. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to the application of topical preparations. We performed a network meta-analysis to facilitate simultaneous comparisons between multiple preparations across studies. We calculated differences between preparations using odds ratios and their 95% CIs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.Results:The search yielded 17 RCTs (1350 patients), of which 9 were suitable for the network meta-analysis (775 patients). Overall, 2 RCTs were deemed as having a low risk of bias, and 15 raised “some concerns” of bias. Preparations included benzoyl peroxide (BPO), BPO combined with clindamycin, chlorhexidine gluconate, hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and water with soap. Only BPO resulted in significantly lower odds of a positive C acnes culture compared with placebo or soap and water (odds ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.36]). There was no statistically significant difference with all other topical preparations. The only adverse events were skin irritation from BPO and chlorhexidine gluconate in a small number of reported cases.Conclusion:BPO was the most effective topical agent in reducing the prevalence of C acnes in shoulder surgery. These results were limited by a combination of indirect and direct data. Future studies should focus on establishing the optimal frequency and duration of preoperative BPO to further reduce the burden of C acnes.Registration:CRD42022310312 (PROSPERO).\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231223877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231223877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:痤疮丙酸杆菌(Cutibacterium acnes)是一种皮肤共生细菌,主要存在于皮脂腺和毛囊中,在肩部发病率较高。它是肩关节置换术后假体关节感染中最常见的致病菌。研究设计:Meta 分析;证据等级,1。方法:我们检索了 2022 年 3 月的 MEDLINE、Embase、PsychINFO 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。纳入的随机对照试验(RCT)比较了关节镜或开放式肩关节手术中任何形式的局部制剂。主要结果是痤疮丙酸杆菌培养阳性数量的减少。次要结果是与使用外用制剂相关的不良事件。我们进行了网络荟萃分析,以便同时比较不同研究中多种制剂之间的差异。我们使用几率比及其 95% CI 计算了不同制剂之间的差异。结果:检索结果显示有 17 项研究性试验(1350 名患者),其中 9 项适合进行网络荟萃分析(775 名患者)。总体而言,2 项研究被认为偏倚风险较低,15 项研究存在 "一些 "偏倚问题。制剂包括过氧化苯甲酰(BPO)、过氧化苯甲酰与克林霉素合剂、葡萄糖酸氯己定、过氧化氢、聚维酮碘和肥皂水。与安慰剂或肥皂水相比,只有 BPO 能明显降低痤疮丙酸杆菌培养阳性的几率(几率比为 0.12 [95% CI,0.04-0.36])。其他外用制剂在统计学上没有明显差异。结论:BPO是减少肩部手术中痤疮丙酸杆菌感染率最有效的外用制剂。这些结果受到间接和直接数据的限制。未来的研究应侧重于确定术前 BPO 的最佳频率和持续时间,以进一步减少痤疮丙酸杆菌的负担。注册号:CRD42022310312 (PROSPERO)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical Preparations for Reducing Cutibacterium acnes Infections in Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background:Cutibacterium acnes ( C acnes) is a commensal skin bacterium, primarily found in sebaceous glands and hair follicles, with a high prevalence in the shoulder region. It is the most common pathogenic organism in prosthetic joint infections after shoulder arthroplasty. Because of its low virulence, its diagnosis remains difficult.Purpose:To evaluate the relative effects of topical preparations in reducing C acnes in shoulder surgery.Study Design:Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any form of topical preparation in arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery were included. The primary outcome was a reduction in the number of positive C acnes cultures. Secondary outcomes were adverse events related to the application of topical preparations. We performed a network meta-analysis to facilitate simultaneous comparisons between multiple preparations across studies. We calculated differences between preparations using odds ratios and their 95% CIs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.Results:The search yielded 17 RCTs (1350 patients), of which 9 were suitable for the network meta-analysis (775 patients). Overall, 2 RCTs were deemed as having a low risk of bias, and 15 raised “some concerns” of bias. Preparations included benzoyl peroxide (BPO), BPO combined with clindamycin, chlorhexidine gluconate, hydrogen peroxide, povidone-iodine, and water with soap. Only BPO resulted in significantly lower odds of a positive C acnes culture compared with placebo or soap and water (odds ratio, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.36]). There was no statistically significant difference with all other topical preparations. The only adverse events were skin irritation from BPO and chlorhexidine gluconate in a small number of reported cases.Conclusion:BPO was the most effective topical agent in reducing the prevalence of C acnes in shoulder surgery. These results were limited by a combination of indirect and direct data. Future studies should focus on establishing the optimal frequency and duration of preoperative BPO to further reduce the burden of C acnes.Registration:CRD42022310312 (PROSPERO).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信