非规范性强制性控制

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Linguistics Compass Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12515

Idan Landau

{"title":"非规范性强制性控制","authors":"Idan Landau","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intensive research on Obligatory Control (OC) in the past 2 decades has revealed a rich crosslinguistic terrain of deviations from the classical format. Five types of noncanonical OC are surveyed here: Finite control, controlled overt pronouns, partial control, proxy control and crossed control. Each one is described and illustrated, paying attention to methodological difficulties in establishing its characteristic empirical signature. We then turn to a critical assessment of leading theoretical accounts of these phenomena, pointing to merits and faults, and indicating how they can be integrated with broader concerns of syntactic theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12515","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noncanonical Obligatory Control\",\"authors\":\"Idan Landau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lnc3.12515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intensive research on Obligatory Control (OC) in the past 2 decades has revealed a rich crosslinguistic terrain of deviations from the classical format. Five types of noncanonical OC are surveyed here: Finite control, controlled overt pronouns, partial control, proxy control and crossed control. Each one is described and illustrated, paying attention to methodological difficulties in establishing its characteristic empirical signature. We then turn to a critical assessment of leading theoretical accounts of these phenomena, pointing to merits and faults, and indicating how they can be integrated with broader concerns of syntactic theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12515\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去二十年中，对强制性控制（OC）的深入研究揭示了偏离经典格式的丰富的跨语言领域。本文对五种类型的非规范 OC 进行了调查：有限控制、受控公开代词、部分控制、代理控制和交叉控制。我们对每一种类型都进行了描述和说明，并关注了在确定其经验特征时所遇到的方法论困难。然后，我们将对这些现象的主要理论论述进行批判性评估，指出其优缺点，并说明如何将它们与句法理论的更广泛关注点结合起来。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Noncanonical Obligatory Control

Intensive research on Obligatory Control (OC) in the past 2 decades has revealed a rich crosslinguistic terrain of deviations from the classical format. Five types of noncanonical OC are surveyed here: Finite control, controlled overt pronouns, partial control, proxy control and crossed control. Each one is described and illustrated, paying attention to methodological difficulties in establishing its characteristic empirical signature. We then turn to a critical assessment of leading theoretical accounts of these phenomena, pointing to merits and faults, and indicating how they can be integrated with broader concerns of syntactic theory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.