将绿色财政政策、能源、经济增长、人口动态和环境退化联系起来:德国的经验证据

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sinan Erdogan
{"title":"将绿色财政政策、能源、经济增长、人口动态和环境退化联系起来:德国的经验证据","authors":"Sinan Erdogan","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Green fiscal policy instruments have been considered among the most effective against climate change and environmental conservation. However, there is limited knowledge of whether green fiscal policy instruments create the desired results. The primary objective of this research is to examine the impact of green fiscal policies in achieving environmental sustainability for the period from 1995 to 2020. To this end, Germany is utilized as a research sample, which commonly practices fiscal instruments to internalize negative economic development externalities. Besides, various control variables, including energy consumption, energy innovations, economic growth, and population density, are incorporated into the empirical model. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach is used as the baseline estimation method, while Fully Modified Least Squares and Canonical Regression methods are used for robustness check. The empirical outcomes show that (i) environmental taxes do not serve as an effective green fiscal policy tool, (ii) energy use exacerbates environmental pollution, (iii) economic growth and population density reduce environmental pollution, (iv) the impact of energy innovations on environmental pollution is controversial. Therefore, policymakers in Germany should not rely on environmental taxes as a green fiscal policy tool for combating climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 114110"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking green fiscal policy, energy, economic growth, population dynamics, and environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from Germany\",\"authors\":\"Sinan Erdogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Green fiscal policy instruments have been considered among the most effective against climate change and environmental conservation. However, there is limited knowledge of whether green fiscal policy instruments create the desired results. The primary objective of this research is to examine the impact of green fiscal policies in achieving environmental sustainability for the period from 1995 to 2020. To this end, Germany is utilized as a research sample, which commonly practices fiscal instruments to internalize negative economic development externalities. Besides, various control variables, including energy consumption, energy innovations, economic growth, and population density, are incorporated into the empirical model. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach is used as the baseline estimation method, while Fully Modified Least Squares and Canonical Regression methods are used for robustness check. The empirical outcomes show that (i) environmental taxes do not serve as an effective green fiscal policy tool, (ii) energy use exacerbates environmental pollution, (iii) economic growth and population density reduce environmental pollution, (iv) the impact of energy innovations on environmental pollution is controversial. Therefore, policymakers in Germany should not rely on environmental taxes as a green fiscal policy tool for combating climate change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色财政政策工具被认为是应对气候变化和环境保护最有效的工具之一。然而,人们对绿色财政政策工具是否能产生预期效果的了解还很有限。本研究的主要目的是探讨 1995 年至 2020 年期间绿色财政政策对实现环境可持续性的影响。为此,本文以德国为研究样本,因为德国通常采用财政手段将经济发展的负外部性内部化。此外,实证模型还纳入了各种控制变量,包括能源消耗、能源创新、经济增长和人口密度。使用自回归分布滞后法作为基准估计方法,同时使用完全修正最小二乘法和卡农回归法进行稳健性检验。实证结果表明:(i) 环境税不能作为有效的绿色财政政策工具;(ii) 能源使用加剧了环境污染;(iii) 经济增长和人口密度减少了环境污染;(iv) 能源创新对环境污染的影响存在争议。因此,德国的政策制定者不应将环境税作为应对气候变化的绿色财政政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linking green fiscal policy, energy, economic growth, population dynamics, and environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from Germany

Green fiscal policy instruments have been considered among the most effective against climate change and environmental conservation. However, there is limited knowledge of whether green fiscal policy instruments create the desired results. The primary objective of this research is to examine the impact of green fiscal policies in achieving environmental sustainability for the period from 1995 to 2020. To this end, Germany is utilized as a research sample, which commonly practices fiscal instruments to internalize negative economic development externalities. Besides, various control variables, including energy consumption, energy innovations, economic growth, and population density, are incorporated into the empirical model. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag approach is used as the baseline estimation method, while Fully Modified Least Squares and Canonical Regression methods are used for robustness check. The empirical outcomes show that (i) environmental taxes do not serve as an effective green fiscal policy tool, (ii) energy use exacerbates environmental pollution, (iii) economic growth and population density reduce environmental pollution, (iv) the impact of energy innovations on environmental pollution is controversial. Therefore, policymakers in Germany should not rely on environmental taxes as a green fiscal policy tool for combating climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信