慢性踝关节不稳定患者单腿落地时的关节运动模式与感知到的不稳定性之间的关系

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kentaro Watanabe , Yuta Koshino , Kosumi Nakagawa , Tomoya Ishida , Satoshi Kasahara , Mina Samukawa , Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"慢性踝关节不稳定患者单腿落地时的关节运动模式与感知到的不稳定性之间的关系","authors":"Kentaro Watanabe ,&nbsp;Yuta Koshino ,&nbsp;Kosumi Nakagawa ,&nbsp;Tomoya Ishida ,&nbsp;Satoshi Kasahara ,&nbsp;Mina Samukawa ,&nbsp;Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Perceived instability is a primary symptom among individuals with chronic ankle instability. However, the relationship between joint kinematics during landing remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the relationships between landing kinematics and perceived instability in individuals with chronic ankle instability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 32 individuals with chronic ankle instability, we recorded ankle, knee, and hip joint angles during a single-leg drop landing. Joint angle waveforms during 200 ms before and after initial contact were summarized into single values using two methods: peak joint angles and principal component scores via principal component analysis. Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (<em>ρ</em>), we examined the relationships of peak joint angles and principal component scores with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score, with a lower score indicating a greater perceived instability (<em>α</em> = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The second principal component scores of ankle angle in the horizontal and sagittal planes significantly correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (Horizontal: <em>ρ</em> = 0.507, <em>P</em> = 0.003; Sagittal: <em>ρ</em> = −0.359, <em>P</em> = 0.044). These scores indicated the differences in the magnitude of angles before and after landing. Significant correlations indicated a greater perceived instability correlated with smaller internal rotation and plantarflexion before landing and smaller external rotation and dorsiflexion after landing. In contrast, no peak joint angles correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle movements during landing associated with perceived instability may be a protective strategy before landing and potentially cause ankle instability after landing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between joint kinematic patterns during single-leg drop landing and perceived instability in individuals with chronic ankle instability\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Watanabe ,&nbsp;Yuta Koshino ,&nbsp;Kosumi Nakagawa ,&nbsp;Tomoya Ishida ,&nbsp;Satoshi Kasahara ,&nbsp;Mina Samukawa ,&nbsp;Harukazu Tohyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Perceived instability is a primary symptom among individuals with chronic ankle instability. However, the relationship between joint kinematics during landing remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the relationships between landing kinematics and perceived instability in individuals with chronic ankle instability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In 32 individuals with chronic ankle instability, we recorded ankle, knee, and hip joint angles during a single-leg drop landing. Joint angle waveforms during 200 ms before and after initial contact were summarized into single values using two methods: peak joint angles and principal component scores via principal component analysis. Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (<em>ρ</em>), we examined the relationships of peak joint angles and principal component scores with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score, with a lower score indicating a greater perceived instability (<em>α</em> = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The second principal component scores of ankle angle in the horizontal and sagittal planes significantly correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (Horizontal: <em>ρ</em> = 0.507, <em>P</em> = 0.003; Sagittal: <em>ρ</em> = −0.359, <em>P</em> = 0.044). These scores indicated the differences in the magnitude of angles before and after landing. Significant correlations indicated a greater perceived instability correlated with smaller internal rotation and plantarflexion before landing and smaller external rotation and dorsiflexion after landing. In contrast, no peak joint angles correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>In individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle movements during landing associated with perceived instability may be a protective strategy before landing and potentially cause ankle instability after landing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332400069X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332400069X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景感知不稳是慢性踝关节不稳患者的主要症状。然而,着地时关节运动学之间的关系仍不清楚。因此,我们研究了慢性踝关节不稳定患者的着地运动学与感知不稳定性之间的关系。方法 在 32 名慢性踝关节不稳定患者中,我们记录了单腿落地时的踝关节、膝关节和髋关节角度。使用两种方法将初始接触前后 200 毫秒内的关节角度波形总结为单一值:关节角度峰值和通过主成分分析得出的主成分得分。利用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(ρ),我们研究了关节角度峰值和主成分得分与坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具得分的关系,得分越低表明感知的不稳定性越高(α = 0.05)。研究结果踝关节角度在水平面和矢状面的第二主成分得分与坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具得分有显著相关性(水平面:ρ = 0.507,P = 0.003;矢状面:ρ = -0.359,P = 0.044)。这些分数表明着陆前后角度大小的差异。显著的相关性表明,着地前较小的内旋和跖屈以及着地后较小的外旋和背屈与较大的感知不稳定性相关。相比之下,关节角度峰值与坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具评分没有相关性(P >0.05)。在患有慢性踝关节不稳定性的个体中,着陆时与感知不稳定性相关的踝关节运动可能是着陆前的一种保护策略,但也可能导致着陆后的踝关节不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relationship between joint kinematic patterns during single-leg drop landing and perceived instability in individuals with chronic ankle instability

Background

Perceived instability is a primary symptom among individuals with chronic ankle instability. However, the relationship between joint kinematics during landing remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the relationships between landing kinematics and perceived instability in individuals with chronic ankle instability.

Methods

In 32 individuals with chronic ankle instability, we recorded ankle, knee, and hip joint angles during a single-leg drop landing. Joint angle waveforms during 200 ms before and after initial contact were summarized into single values using two methods: peak joint angles and principal component scores via principal component analysis. Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ), we examined the relationships of peak joint angles and principal component scores with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score, with a lower score indicating a greater perceived instability (α = 0.05).

Findings

The second principal component scores of ankle angle in the horizontal and sagittal planes significantly correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (Horizontal: ρ = 0.507, P = 0.003; Sagittal: ρ = −0.359, P = 0.044). These scores indicated the differences in the magnitude of angles before and after landing. Significant correlations indicated a greater perceived instability correlated with smaller internal rotation and plantarflexion before landing and smaller external rotation and dorsiflexion after landing. In contrast, no peak joint angles correlated with the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool score (P > 0.05).

Interpretation

In individuals with chronic ankle instability, ankle movements during landing associated with perceived instability may be a protective strategy before landing and potentially cause ankle instability after landing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信