Huifang Luo , Ping Du , Wenyan Qin , Yiyi Hu , Zhen Xian , Changsong Lin , Peiwu Li , Yang Song , Xiangwei Yang
{"title":"皮内针灸治疗类风湿性关节炎伴肝肾阴虚综合征--假对照随机临床试验","authors":"Huifang Luo , Ping Du , Wenyan Qin , Yiyi Hu , Zhen Xian , Changsong Lin , Peiwu Li , Yang Song , Xiangwei Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is called “immortal cancer”, and it affects the quality of life, disability rate and even the survival of patients. This study aimed to observe the clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions of intradermal acupuncture (IA) in the treatment of RA patients with liver and kidney deficiency syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>132 RA patients were split into an IA group and a sham IA group at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups were assessed before and after the intervention with the assessments: a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome evaluation, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant difference in TCM syndrome evaluation, HAQ, DAS28, and CRP between both groups before and after treatment (<em>P</em> < 0.01). The improvement of TCM syndrome evaluation (95% <em>CI</em> [1.14(0.38–1.89)]; <em>P</em> = 0.001), HAQ (95% <em>CI</em> [2.00(1.00–3.00)]; <em>P</em> = 0.003), and DAS28 (95% <em>CI</em> [0.11(0.02–0.20)]; <em>P</em> = 0.021) in the IA group was more obvious than that in the sham IA group (<em>P</em> < 0.05), except for CRP (95% <em>CI</em> [0.50(− 2.09 to 7.08)], <em>P</em> = 0.786). The difference in CRP outcome changes between the two groups was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Both groups had comparable results in the implementation of RA in the upper and lower extremity acupoints and did not differ due to different sites (IA group: <em>P</em> = 0.852; sham IA group: <em>P</em> = 0.861). The comparison of effective rate of the upper limb as well as that of the lower limb was statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.001). Besides, patients reported no adverse effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The IA intervention was associated with a promising effect on the decrease in RA disease activity and delayed overall disease progression.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000256/pdfft?md5=9dffba969dbaa5db1ee0e86a752929e1&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229924000256-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intradermal acupuncture in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with liver and kidney deficiency syndrome – A sham-controlled, randomized, clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Huifang Luo , Ping Du , Wenyan Qin , Yiyi Hu , Zhen Xian , Changsong Lin , Peiwu Li , Yang Song , Xiangwei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is called “immortal cancer”, and it affects the quality of life, disability rate and even the survival of patients. This study aimed to observe the clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions of intradermal acupuncture (IA) in the treatment of RA patients with liver and kidney deficiency syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>132 RA patients were split into an IA group and a sham IA group at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups were assessed before and after the intervention with the assessments: a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome evaluation, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistically significant difference in TCM syndrome evaluation, HAQ, DAS28, and CRP between both groups before and after treatment (<em>P</em> < 0.01). The improvement of TCM syndrome evaluation (95% <em>CI</em> [1.14(0.38–1.89)]; <em>P</em> = 0.001), HAQ (95% <em>CI</em> [2.00(1.00–3.00)]; <em>P</em> = 0.003), and DAS28 (95% <em>CI</em> [0.11(0.02–0.20)]; <em>P</em> = 0.021) in the IA group was more obvious than that in the sham IA group (<em>P</em> < 0.05), except for CRP (95% <em>CI</em> [0.50(− 2.09 to 7.08)], <em>P</em> = 0.786). The difference in CRP outcome changes between the two groups was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> > 0.05). Both groups had comparable results in the implementation of RA in the upper and lower extremity acupoints and did not differ due to different sites (IA group: <em>P</em> = 0.852; sham IA group: <em>P</em> = 0.861). The comparison of effective rate of the upper limb as well as that of the lower limb was statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.001). Besides, patients reported no adverse effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The IA intervention was associated with a promising effect on the decrease in RA disease activity and delayed overall disease progression.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000256/pdfft?md5=9dffba969dbaa5db1ee0e86a752929e1&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229924000256-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229924000256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的类风湿性关节炎(RA)被称为 "不死的癌症",影响患者的生活质量、致残率甚至生存。本研究旨在观察皮内针刺(IA)治疗RA肝肾亏虚证患者的临床疗效及不良反应。两组患者在干预前后均接受了中医证候评估、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、疾病活动度评分28(DAS28)和血清C反应蛋白(CRP)的评估。结果两组患者在治疗前后的中医证候评估、HAQ、DAS28和CRP差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。中医综合征评估(95% CI [1.14(0.38-1.89)];P = 0.001)、HAQ(95% CI [2.00(1.00-3.00)];P = 0.003)和 DAS28(95% CI [0.11(0.02-0.20)];P = 0.021),除CRP(95% CI [0.50(- 2.09 to 7.08)],P = 0.786)外,IA组较假IA组明显(P < 0.05)。两组 CRP 结果变化的差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组在上肢和下肢穴位实施 RA 的效果相当,没有因部位不同而产生差异(IA 组:P = 0.852;假 IA 组:P = 0.861)。上肢和下肢的有效率比较有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。此外,患者未报告任何不良反应。
Intradermal acupuncture in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with liver and kidney deficiency syndrome – A sham-controlled, randomized, clinical trial
Background and purpose
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is called “immortal cancer”, and it affects the quality of life, disability rate and even the survival of patients. This study aimed to observe the clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions of intradermal acupuncture (IA) in the treatment of RA patients with liver and kidney deficiency syndrome.
Materials and methods
132 RA patients were split into an IA group and a sham IA group at a 1:1 ratio. Both groups were assessed before and after the intervention with the assessments: a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome evaluation, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP).
Results
There was a statistically significant difference in TCM syndrome evaluation, HAQ, DAS28, and CRP between both groups before and after treatment (P < 0.01). The improvement of TCM syndrome evaluation (95% CI [1.14(0.38–1.89)]; P = 0.001), HAQ (95% CI [2.00(1.00–3.00)]; P = 0.003), and DAS28 (95% CI [0.11(0.02–0.20)]; P = 0.021) in the IA group was more obvious than that in the sham IA group (P < 0.05), except for CRP (95% CI [0.50(− 2.09 to 7.08)], P = 0.786). The difference in CRP outcome changes between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Both groups had comparable results in the implementation of RA in the upper and lower extremity acupoints and did not differ due to different sites (IA group: P = 0.852; sham IA group: P = 0.861). The comparison of effective rate of the upper limb as well as that of the lower limb was statistically significant (P = 0.001). Besides, patients reported no adverse effects.
Conclusion
The IA intervention was associated with a promising effect on the decrease in RA disease activity and delayed overall disease progression.