破坏性地震后重新定居世系的首次基因组快照

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07117
Felix Vaux, Elahe Parvizi, Grant A. Duffy, Ludovic Dutoit, Dave Craw, Jonathan M. Waters, Ceridwen I. Fraser
{"title":"破坏性地震后重新定居世系的首次基因组快照","authors":"Felix Vaux,&nbsp;Elahe Parvizi,&nbsp;Grant A. Duffy,&nbsp;Ludovic Dutoit,&nbsp;Dave Craw,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Waters,&nbsp;Ceridwen I. Fraser","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large-scale disturbance events provide ideal opportunities to directly study recolonisation processes in natural environments, via the removal of competitors and the formation of newly vacant habitat. A high magnitude earthquake in central New Zealand in 2016 created major ecological disturbance, with coastal tectonic uplift of up to ~ 6 m extirpating vast swathes of intertidal organisms. One of the affected species was <i>Durvillaea antarctica</i> (rimurapa or southern bull kelp), which is an important habitat-forming intertidal macroalga capable of long-distance dispersal. Across the complex fault system with varying amounts of uplift, the species was either locally extirpated or heavily reduced in abundance. We hypothesised that neutral priority effects and chance dispersal from other populations would influence which lineages would establish. We sampled individuals of <i>D. antarctica</i> across the uplift zone immediately after the earthquake in 2016 and then repeatedly sampled new recruits in the same areas between 2017 and 2020, using genotyping-by-sequencing to provide ‘before' and ‘after' genomic comparisons. Our results revealed strong geographic clustering but little evidence of new lineages establishing at disturbed sites, although populations at uplifted sites remain at remarkably low densities. We infer that recolonisation has thus far primarily originated from refugial, remnant patches within the uplift zone. To complement the phylogeographic analysis, we estimated oceanographic connectivity among the uplift zone sample locations. The connectivity modelling estimated that northbound dispersal of <i>D. antarctica</i> was more likely, but we have not yet detected southern genotypes in the recolonised populations. As the ongoing recolonisation process transitions from an ecological to an evolutionary timescale, change remains possible. This study provides the first genomic ‘snapshots' of a natural recolonisation process following a large-scale ecological disturbance event, and ongoing research has the potential to reveal important insight into both micro- and macroevolutionary processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First genomic snapshots of recolonising lineages following a devastating earthquake\",\"authors\":\"Felix Vaux,&nbsp;Elahe Parvizi,&nbsp;Grant A. Duffy,&nbsp;Ludovic Dutoit,&nbsp;Dave Craw,&nbsp;Jonathan M. Waters,&nbsp;Ceridwen I. Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecog.07117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Large-scale disturbance events provide ideal opportunities to directly study recolonisation processes in natural environments, via the removal of competitors and the formation of newly vacant habitat. A high magnitude earthquake in central New Zealand in 2016 created major ecological disturbance, with coastal tectonic uplift of up to ~ 6 m extirpating vast swathes of intertidal organisms. One of the affected species was <i>Durvillaea antarctica</i> (rimurapa or southern bull kelp), which is an important habitat-forming intertidal macroalga capable of long-distance dispersal. Across the complex fault system with varying amounts of uplift, the species was either locally extirpated or heavily reduced in abundance. We hypothesised that neutral priority effects and chance dispersal from other populations would influence which lineages would establish. We sampled individuals of <i>D. antarctica</i> across the uplift zone immediately after the earthquake in 2016 and then repeatedly sampled new recruits in the same areas between 2017 and 2020, using genotyping-by-sequencing to provide ‘before' and ‘after' genomic comparisons. Our results revealed strong geographic clustering but little evidence of new lineages establishing at disturbed sites, although populations at uplifted sites remain at remarkably low densities. We infer that recolonisation has thus far primarily originated from refugial, remnant patches within the uplift zone. To complement the phylogeographic analysis, we estimated oceanographic connectivity among the uplift zone sample locations. The connectivity modelling estimated that northbound dispersal of <i>D. antarctica</i> was more likely, but we have not yet detected southern genotypes in the recolonised populations. As the ongoing recolonisation process transitions from an ecological to an evolutionary timescale, change remains possible. This study provides the first genomic ‘snapshots' of a natural recolonisation process following a large-scale ecological disturbance event, and ongoing research has the potential to reveal important insight into both micro- and macroevolutionary processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模干扰事件通过清除竞争者和形成新的空置生境,为直接研究自然环境中的重新定殖过程提供了理想的机会。2016 年,新西兰中部发生了一次强烈地震,造成了严重的生态干扰,高达约 6 米的海岸构造隆起使大片潮间带生物灭绝。其中一个受影响的物种是 Durvillaea antarctica(rimurapa 或南公牛海带),它是一种重要的生境形成潮间带大型藻类,能够进行远距离传播。在隆升程度不同的复杂断层系统中,该物种要么局部灭绝,要么数量严重减少。我们假定,中性优先效应和来自其他种群的偶然扩散将影响哪个品系的建立。我们在2016年地震后立即对整个隆起带的南极蝶个体进行了采样,然后在2017年至2020年期间在相同地区反复对新招募的个体进行采样,利用基因分型测序技术提供 "之前 "和 "之后 "的基因组比较。我们的研究结果表明,尽管隆起地点的种群密度仍然很低,但在受干扰的地点却几乎没有新品系建立的证据。我们推断,迄今为止,重新定殖主要起源于隆起带内的避难所和残留斑块。为了补充系统地理学分析,我们估算了隆起带样本地点之间的海洋连通性。据连接性模型估计,南极蝶更有可能向北传播,但我们尚未在重新定居的种群中发现南方基因型。随着正在进行的重新定居过程从生态时间尺度过渡到进化时间尺度,仍有可能发生变化。这项研究首次提供了大规模生态干扰事件后自然重新定居过程的基因组 "快照",正在进行的研究有可能揭示微观和宏观进化过程的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

First genomic snapshots of recolonising lineages following a devastating earthquake

First genomic snapshots of recolonising lineages following a devastating earthquake

Large-scale disturbance events provide ideal opportunities to directly study recolonisation processes in natural environments, via the removal of competitors and the formation of newly vacant habitat. A high magnitude earthquake in central New Zealand in 2016 created major ecological disturbance, with coastal tectonic uplift of up to ~ 6 m extirpating vast swathes of intertidal organisms. One of the affected species was Durvillaea antarctica (rimurapa or southern bull kelp), which is an important habitat-forming intertidal macroalga capable of long-distance dispersal. Across the complex fault system with varying amounts of uplift, the species was either locally extirpated or heavily reduced in abundance. We hypothesised that neutral priority effects and chance dispersal from other populations would influence which lineages would establish. We sampled individuals of D. antarctica across the uplift zone immediately after the earthquake in 2016 and then repeatedly sampled new recruits in the same areas between 2017 and 2020, using genotyping-by-sequencing to provide ‘before' and ‘after' genomic comparisons. Our results revealed strong geographic clustering but little evidence of new lineages establishing at disturbed sites, although populations at uplifted sites remain at remarkably low densities. We infer that recolonisation has thus far primarily originated from refugial, remnant patches within the uplift zone. To complement the phylogeographic analysis, we estimated oceanographic connectivity among the uplift zone sample locations. The connectivity modelling estimated that northbound dispersal of D. antarctica was more likely, but we have not yet detected southern genotypes in the recolonised populations. As the ongoing recolonisation process transitions from an ecological to an evolutionary timescale, change remains possible. This study provides the first genomic ‘snapshots' of a natural recolonisation process following a large-scale ecological disturbance event, and ongoing research has the potential to reveal important insight into both micro- and macroevolutionary processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信