有或没有药物使用障碍的躁郁症Ⅰ患者的人格因素、服药依从性和生活质量的比较

Q3 Psychology
Ganesh Kumar Meena, Abhilasha Yadav, Rahul Saha
{"title":"有或没有药物使用障碍的躁郁症Ⅰ患者的人格因素、服药依从性和生活质量的比较","authors":"Ganesh Kumar Meena,&nbsp;Abhilasha Yadav,&nbsp;Rahul Saha","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Some specific personality factors in patients of bipolar disorder are potential risk factors for developing comorbid substance use disorder. Comorbid substance use disorder is one of the most common factors associated with non-adherence to treatment in bipolar disorder patients leading to poor quality of life. We compared all three variables in bipolar disorder-1patients with or without substance use disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It is a cross-sectional study done on 90 patients of Bipolar disorder-1 diagnosed as per DSM-5, 45 without and 45 with comorbid substance use disorder. Personality factors, non-adherence to medication and quality of life were assessed and compared between both the groups using standardized tools and appropriate statistical analysis methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of distribution of socio-economic status (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.31 moderate association), gender (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.37 moderate association), distribution of 16 personality factor B (Cramer's <em>V</em> = 0.28) and factor G (χ2 = 6.222, <em>p</em> = 0.045) (Cramer's <em>V</em> = 0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Small sample size and a cross-sectional study design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SUD and NSUD group differed on 16 PF factor B and G which are factors for reasoning and Rule-Consciousness respectively although on regression analysis this difference was not significant for factor G. In binary logistic regression multivariable model, an average score (as compared to low score) of personality factor B was found to significantly increase the ODDS of substance use. SUD group had more severity and greater number of episodes, had lower level of education, belonged to low socio-economic status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000635/pdfft?md5=bb12dc8d1f47244ba5ea0319fd8acda8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000635-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of personality factors, adherence to medication and quality of life in bipolar disorder-I patients with or without substance use disorder\",\"authors\":\"Ganesh Kumar Meena,&nbsp;Abhilasha Yadav,&nbsp;Rahul Saha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Some specific personality factors in patients of bipolar disorder are potential risk factors for developing comorbid substance use disorder. Comorbid substance use disorder is one of the most common factors associated with non-adherence to treatment in bipolar disorder patients leading to poor quality of life. We compared all three variables in bipolar disorder-1patients with or without substance use disorder.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>It is a cross-sectional study done on 90 patients of Bipolar disorder-1 diagnosed as per DSM-5, 45 without and 45 with comorbid substance use disorder. Personality factors, non-adherence to medication and quality of life were assessed and compared between both the groups using standardized tools and appropriate statistical analysis methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of distribution of socio-economic status (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.31 moderate association), gender (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.37 moderate association), distribution of 16 personality factor B (Cramer's <em>V</em> = 0.28) and factor G (χ2 = 6.222, <em>p</em> = 0.045) (Cramer's <em>V</em> = 0.26).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Small sample size and a cross-sectional study design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SUD and NSUD group differed on 16 PF factor B and G which are factors for reasoning and Rule-Consciousness respectively although on regression analysis this difference was not significant for factor G. In binary logistic regression multivariable model, an average score (as compared to low score) of personality factor B was found to significantly increase the ODDS of substance use. SUD group had more severity and greater number of episodes, had lower level of education, belonged to low socio-economic status.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000635/pdfft?md5=bb12dc8d1f47244ba5ea0319fd8acda8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666915324000635-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915324000635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言躁郁症患者的一些特殊人格因素是导致其合并药物使用障碍的潜在风险因素。合并药物使用障碍是双相情感障碍患者不坚持治疗导致生活质量低下的最常见因素之一。我们比较了有或没有药物使用障碍的双相情感障碍-1 患者的所有三个变量。方法:这是一项横断面研究,对象是 90 名根据 DSM-5 诊断为双相情感障碍-1 的患者,其中 45 人没有合并药物使用障碍,45 人合并了药物使用障碍。采用标准化工具和适当的统计分析方法,对两组患者的人格因素、不遵医嘱用药情况和生活质量进行了评估和比较。结果两组患者在社会经济地位分布(经偏差校正的克拉默指数 = 0.31,中度相关)、性别(经偏差校正的克拉默指数 = 0.37,中度相关)、16 个人格因素 B 的分布(克拉默指数 = 0.28)和因素 G 的分布(χ2 = 6.在二元逻辑回归多变量模型中,人格因素 B 的平均得分(与低分相比)会显著增加药物使用的 ODDS。药物滥用组的严重程度更高,发作次数更多,受教育程度更低,社会经济地位更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of personality factors, adherence to medication and quality of life in bipolar disorder-I patients with or without substance use disorder

Introduction

Some specific personality factors in patients of bipolar disorder are potential risk factors for developing comorbid substance use disorder. Comorbid substance use disorder is one of the most common factors associated with non-adherence to treatment in bipolar disorder patients leading to poor quality of life. We compared all three variables in bipolar disorder-1patients with or without substance use disorder.

Methods

It is a cross-sectional study done on 90 patients of Bipolar disorder-1 diagnosed as per DSM-5, 45 without and 45 with comorbid substance use disorder. Personality factors, non-adherence to medication and quality of life were assessed and compared between both the groups using standardized tools and appropriate statistical analysis methods.

Results

There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of distribution of socio-economic status (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.31 moderate association), gender (Bias Corrected Cramer'sV = 0.37 moderate association), distribution of 16 personality factor B (Cramer's V = 0.28) and factor G (χ2 = 6.222, p = 0.045) (Cramer's V = 0.26).

Limitations

Small sample size and a cross-sectional study design.

Conclusion

SUD and NSUD group differed on 16 PF factor B and G which are factors for reasoning and Rule-Consciousness respectively although on regression analysis this difference was not significant for factor G. In binary logistic regression multivariable model, an average score (as compared to low score) of personality factor B was found to significantly increase the ODDS of substance use. SUD group had more severity and greater number of episodes, had lower level of education, belonged to low socio-economic status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信