射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者运动时的呼吸症状感知

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Josh T. Goh , Bryce N. Balmain , Andrew R. Tomlinson , James P. MacNamara , Satyam Sarma , Thomas Ritz , Denis J. Wakeham , Tiffany L. Brazile , Linda S. Hynan , Benjamin D. Levine , Tony G. Babb
{"title":"射血分数保留型心力衰竭患者运动时的呼吸症状感知","authors":"Josh T. Goh ,&nbsp;Bryce N. Balmain ,&nbsp;Andrew R. Tomlinson ,&nbsp;James P. MacNamara ,&nbsp;Satyam Sarma ,&nbsp;Thomas Ritz ,&nbsp;Denis J. Wakeham ,&nbsp;Tiffany L. Brazile ,&nbsp;Linda S. Hynan ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Levine ,&nbsp;Tony G. Babb","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0–10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1–10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1−10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p&gt;0.05). RPB correlated (p&lt;0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), “anxious” (r=0.610), and “afraid” (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory symptom perception during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction\",\"authors\":\"Josh T. Goh ,&nbsp;Bryce N. Balmain ,&nbsp;Andrew R. Tomlinson ,&nbsp;James P. MacNamara ,&nbsp;Satyam Sarma ,&nbsp;Thomas Ritz ,&nbsp;Denis J. Wakeham ,&nbsp;Tiffany L. Brazile ,&nbsp;Linda S. Hynan ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Levine ,&nbsp;Tony G. Babb\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2</sub>) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0–10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1–10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1−10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p&gt;0.05). RPB correlated (p&lt;0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), “anxious” (r=0.610), and “afraid” (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000491\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了在射血分数保留型心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者中,中枢或外周对摄氧的限制是否会引起不同的呼吸感觉,以及用力时呼吸困难(DOE)是否会引起不愉快和负面情绪。根据增量骑车测试中的心输出量(Q.̇c)/吸氧量(V.̇O2)斜率和每搏容量(SV)储备对 48 名患者进行了分类。15 人被归类为中枢受限,33 人被归类为外周受限。在 20 W 自行车测试中,对呼吸困难感(RPB)和不愉快感(RPU)进行了评估(博格 0-10 级评分)。随后对 15 项呼吸感觉陈述(1-10 分制)和 5 项负面情绪陈述(1-10 分制)进行评分。RPB(中枢:3.5±2.0 vs. 外周:3.4±2.0,p=0.86)、呼吸感觉或负面情绪在组间无差异(p>0.05)。RPB 与 RPU(r=0.925)、"焦虑"(r=0.610)和 "害怕"(r=0.383)相关(p<0.05)。虽然 DOE 会引发负面情绪水平的升高,但 DOE 和呼吸感觉似乎更多地与一种共同机制有关,而非高频心衰患者的中枢和/或外周限制因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory symptom perception during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O2) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0–10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1–10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1−10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p>0.05). RPB correlated (p<0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), “anxious” (r=0.610), and “afraid” (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信