探索谣言反驳的接受度:功利主义和享乐主义价值观的中介影响

Anjan Pal, Alton Y. K. Chua, D. Goh
{"title":"探索谣言反驳的接受度:功利主义和享乐主义价值观的中介影响","authors":"Anjan Pal, Alton Y. K. Chua, D. Goh","doi":"10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the mediating roles of perceived utilitarian and hedonic values in the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. For the purpose of this investigation, four mediation models, each comprised of two hypotheses, were proposed and tested with data collected from 305 participants. Parallel mediation analysis was performed on each model to test the proposed hypotheses. Results show that users’ perceptions of rebuttals were significantly associated with their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. While both perceived utilitarian and hedonic values mediated the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisionmaking, the mediating role of the former was stronger than the latter. This research offers insights into the underlying process of how both values impact users’ decisions to accept rebuttals as the truth. It helps practitioners understand how users perceive and process rebuttals when dealing with online rumors.","PeriodicalId":518057,"journal":{"name":"2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Acceptance of Rumor Rebuttals: The Mediating Influence of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values\",\"authors\":\"Anjan Pal, Alton Y. K. Chua, D. Goh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines the mediating roles of perceived utilitarian and hedonic values in the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. For the purpose of this investigation, four mediation models, each comprised of two hypotheses, were proposed and tested with data collected from 305 participants. Parallel mediation analysis was performed on each model to test the proposed hypotheses. Results show that users’ perceptions of rebuttals were significantly associated with their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. While both perceived utilitarian and hedonic values mediated the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisionmaking, the mediating role of the former was stronger than the latter. This research offers insights into the underlying process of how both values impact users’ decisions to accept rebuttals as the truth. It helps practitioners understand how users perceive and process rebuttals when dealing with online rumors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2024 18th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM60618.2024.10418300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在打击网络谣言的过程中,用户对反驳信息的感知与他们接受揭穿信息的决定之间的关系中,感知到的功利价值和享乐价值所起的中介作用。为此,我们提出了四个中介模型,每个模型由两个假设组成,并利用从 305 名参与者那里收集的数据进行了检验。对每个模型进行了平行中介分析,以检验提出的假设。结果表明,用户对反驳的感知与他们在打击网络谣言时接受揭穿信息的决定有显著关联。虽然感知功利价值和享乐价值都对用户的反驳感知与决策之间的关系起到了中介作用,但前者的中介作用强于后者。这项研究深入揭示了这两种价值观如何影响用户决定接受反驳为真相的基本过程。它有助于从业人员了解用户在处理网络谣言时如何看待和处理反驳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Acceptance of Rumor Rebuttals: The Mediating Influence of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values
This research examines the mediating roles of perceived utilitarian and hedonic values in the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. For the purpose of this investigation, four mediation models, each comprised of two hypotheses, were proposed and tested with data collected from 305 participants. Parallel mediation analysis was performed on each model to test the proposed hypotheses. Results show that users’ perceptions of rebuttals were significantly associated with their decisions to accept the debunking messages in combatting online rumors. While both perceived utilitarian and hedonic values mediated the relations between users’ perceptions of rebuttals and their decisionmaking, the mediating role of the former was stronger than the latter. This research offers insights into the underlying process of how both values impact users’ decisions to accept rebuttals as the truth. It helps practitioners understand how users perceive and process rebuttals when dealing with online rumors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信