外固定器在治疗腿部骨骼开放性骨折中的优势:奥文多大学教学医院(CHUO)的约 31 个病例

Dr. Cyprien Mba Mba, Batchom Ad, M. C, O. Sm, Djembi Yr, Nguema Endzegue F, Kassi B, A. Jj, Ondo N’dong F
{"title":"外固定器在治疗腿部骨骼开放性骨折中的优势:奥文多大学教学医院(CHUO)的约 31 个病例","authors":"Dr. Cyprien Mba Mba, Batchom Ad, M. C, O. Sm, Djembi Yr, Nguema Endzegue F, Kassi B, A. Jj, Ondo N’dong F","doi":"10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Open fractures of the leg skeleton represent 8 to 10% of traumatic injuries to the musculoskeletal system. Their stabilization methods remain controversial and the external fixator is one of them. The objective of this study was to show the benefit of the external fixator in the management of these fractures. This was a retrospective study carried out between January 2017 and December 2020 at Owendo University Teaching Hospital. The study concerned all patients admitted for open leg fractures, treated and followed up in the department. We collected 31 patients including 22 men and 9 women. Their average age was 34.2 years (range 18-62 years). The age group from 31 to 50 was the most represented with 54.8% (n=17). Field workers constituted the socio-professional group most affected with 25.8% (n=8). Road traffic accidents (RTA) were the main sources of trauma with 83.9% (n=26). According to the Gustilo and Anderson classification, the type IIIa lesions were the most frequent with 61.2% (n=19). The majority of patients were treated on the 6th day (58.1%, n=18). Occurring in 38.7% (n=12), the complications encountered were infection and delayed union in 16.2% (n=5) each. The average time to consolidation was 23.6 weeks (range 15 -52 weeks). With an average follow-up of 10 months, the results evaluated, according to Ketenjian criteria, were excellent in 19.4% (n=6), very good in 41.9% (n=13), good in 22.6% (n =7) and bad in 6.4% (n=2), in others words 83.9% satisfactory results. the results obtained are generally satisfactory but can be improved if we simplify the methods of providing the external fixator to needy patients.","PeriodicalId":14302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","volume":"121 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit of the external fixator in the management of open fractures of the leg skeleton: About 31 cases at Owendo University Teaching Hospital (CHUO)\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Cyprien Mba Mba, Batchom Ad, M. C, O. Sm, Djembi Yr, Nguema Endzegue F, Kassi B, A. Jj, Ondo N’dong F\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Open fractures of the leg skeleton represent 8 to 10% of traumatic injuries to the musculoskeletal system. Their stabilization methods remain controversial and the external fixator is one of them. The objective of this study was to show the benefit of the external fixator in the management of these fractures. This was a retrospective study carried out between January 2017 and December 2020 at Owendo University Teaching Hospital. The study concerned all patients admitted for open leg fractures, treated and followed up in the department. We collected 31 patients including 22 men and 9 women. Their average age was 34.2 years (range 18-62 years). The age group from 31 to 50 was the most represented with 54.8% (n=17). Field workers constituted the socio-professional group most affected with 25.8% (n=8). Road traffic accidents (RTA) were the main sources of trauma with 83.9% (n=26). According to the Gustilo and Anderson classification, the type IIIa lesions were the most frequent with 61.2% (n=19). The majority of patients were treated on the 6th day (58.1%, n=18). Occurring in 38.7% (n=12), the complications encountered were infection and delayed union in 16.2% (n=5) each. The average time to consolidation was 23.6 weeks (range 15 -52 weeks). With an average follow-up of 10 months, the results evaluated, according to Ketenjian criteria, were excellent in 19.4% (n=6), very good in 41.9% (n=13), good in 22.6% (n =7) and bad in 6.4% (n=2), in others words 83.9% satisfactory results. the results obtained are generally satisfactory but can be improved if we simplify the methods of providing the external fixator to needy patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"volume\":\"121 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腿部骨骼的开放性骨折占肌肉骨骼系统创伤的 8%至 10%。其稳定方法仍存在争议,而外固定器就是其中之一。本研究的目的是显示外固定器在治疗此类骨折中的优势。这是一项回顾性研究,于2017年1月至2020年12月期间在奥文多大学教学医院进行。研究涉及因开放性腿部骨折入院、在该科室接受治疗和随访的所有患者。我们收集了 31 名患者,包括 22 名男性和 9 名女性。他们的平均年龄为 34.2 岁(18-62 岁不等)。31至50岁年龄段的患者最多,占54.8%(17人)。野外工作者是受影响最大的社会职业群体,占 25.8%(人数=8)。道路交通事故是造成创伤的主要原因,占 83.9%(26 人)。根据古斯蒂洛和安德森的分类,IIIa型病变最为常见,占61.2%(19人)。大多数患者在第 6 天接受治疗(58.1%,n=18)。并发症发生率为38.7%(12人),感染和延迟愈合各占16.2%(5人)。平均巩固时间为23.6周(15-52周不等)。平均随访时间为 10 个月,根据 Ketenjian 标准评估的结果是:19.4%(6 人)为优秀,41.9%(13 人)为非常优秀,22.6%(7 人)为良好,6.4%(2 人)为不良,换言之,83.9% 的结果令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Benefit of the external fixator in the management of open fractures of the leg skeleton: About 31 cases at Owendo University Teaching Hospital (CHUO)
Open fractures of the leg skeleton represent 8 to 10% of traumatic injuries to the musculoskeletal system. Their stabilization methods remain controversial and the external fixator is one of them. The objective of this study was to show the benefit of the external fixator in the management of these fractures. This was a retrospective study carried out between January 2017 and December 2020 at Owendo University Teaching Hospital. The study concerned all patients admitted for open leg fractures, treated and followed up in the department. We collected 31 patients including 22 men and 9 women. Their average age was 34.2 years (range 18-62 years). The age group from 31 to 50 was the most represented with 54.8% (n=17). Field workers constituted the socio-professional group most affected with 25.8% (n=8). Road traffic accidents (RTA) were the main sources of trauma with 83.9% (n=26). According to the Gustilo and Anderson classification, the type IIIa lesions were the most frequent with 61.2% (n=19). The majority of patients were treated on the 6th day (58.1%, n=18). Occurring in 38.7% (n=12), the complications encountered were infection and delayed union in 16.2% (n=5) each. The average time to consolidation was 23.6 weeks (range 15 -52 weeks). With an average follow-up of 10 months, the results evaluated, according to Ketenjian criteria, were excellent in 19.4% (n=6), very good in 41.9% (n=13), good in 22.6% (n =7) and bad in 6.4% (n=2), in others words 83.9% satisfactory results. the results obtained are generally satisfactory but can be improved if we simplify the methods of providing the external fixator to needy patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信