发行人股票退市对少数股东的法律保护(印度尼西亚、美国和新加坡法律比较研究)

Hilda Kurnia Ningsih, Richard C. Adam
{"title":"发行人股票退市对少数股东的法律保护(印度尼西亚、美国和新加坡法律比较研究)","authors":"Hilda Kurnia Ningsih, Richard C. Adam","doi":"10.21107/pamator.v16i4.23131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper provides a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks governing the delisting of issuer shares in Indonesia, the United States, and Singapore. Using a normative legal research approach, supplemented by interviews with members of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and a Member of the House of Representatives Commission XI, the study explores how each jurisdiction addresses the delisting process, particularly focusing on the protection of minority shareholders . The analysis reveals that Indonesia's legal system, influenced by its Civil Law heritage, contrasts with the Common Law approaches of the US and Singapore, especially in terms of shareholder involvement in voluntary delisting and the specificity of conditions for forced delisting. The study suggests enhancements to the Indonesian framework, such as clearer guidelines for shareholder approval in delisting decisions and more transparent criteria for forced delisting. These recommendations aim to improve the protection of minority shareholders within Indonesia's Capital Market.","PeriodicalId":243842,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Protection for Minority Shareholders Arising from the Delisting of Issuer Shares (A Comparative Study of Indonesian, United States, and Singapore Law)\",\"authors\":\"Hilda Kurnia Ningsih, Richard C. Adam\",\"doi\":\"10.21107/pamator.v16i4.23131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper provides a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks governing the delisting of issuer shares in Indonesia, the United States, and Singapore. Using a normative legal research approach, supplemented by interviews with members of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and a Member of the House of Representatives Commission XI, the study explores how each jurisdiction addresses the delisting process, particularly focusing on the protection of minority shareholders . The analysis reveals that Indonesia's legal system, influenced by its Civil Law heritage, contrasts with the Common Law approaches of the US and Singapore, especially in terms of shareholder involvement in voluntary delisting and the specificity of conditions for forced delisting. The study suggests enhancements to the Indonesian framework, such as clearer guidelines for shareholder approval in delisting decisions and more transparent criteria for forced delisting. These recommendations aim to improve the protection of minority shareholders within Indonesia's Capital Market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i4.23131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i4.23131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究论文对印度尼西亚、美国和新加坡有关发行人股票退市的法律框架进行了比较分析。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,并辅以对金融服务管理局(OJK)成员和众议院第十一委员会成员的访谈,探讨了各司法管辖区如何处理退市程序,尤其侧重于对小股东的保护。分析表明,印度尼西亚的法律体系受其民法传统的影响,与美国和新加坡的普通法方法形成鲜明对比,特别是在股东参与自愿退市和强制退市条件的特殊性方面。本研究建议加强印度尼西亚的框架,如在退市决定中为股东批准提供更明确的指导,以及制定更透明的强制退市标准。这些建议旨在改善印尼资本市场对小股东的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Protection for Minority Shareholders Arising from the Delisting of Issuer Shares (A Comparative Study of Indonesian, United States, and Singapore Law)
This research paper provides a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks governing the delisting of issuer shares in Indonesia, the United States, and Singapore. Using a normative legal research approach, supplemented by interviews with members of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and a Member of the House of Representatives Commission XI, the study explores how each jurisdiction addresses the delisting process, particularly focusing on the protection of minority shareholders . The analysis reveals that Indonesia's legal system, influenced by its Civil Law heritage, contrasts with the Common Law approaches of the US and Singapore, especially in terms of shareholder involvement in voluntary delisting and the specificity of conditions for forced delisting. The study suggests enhancements to the Indonesian framework, such as clearer guidelines for shareholder approval in delisting decisions and more transparent criteria for forced delisting. These recommendations aim to improve the protection of minority shareholders within Indonesia's Capital Market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信