正負向心理健康篩檢指標之完整心理健康型態群集分析

李玉嬋 李玉嬋, 方俊凱 方俊凱, 劉介宇 劉介宇, 張文翰 張文翰
{"title":"正負向心理健康篩檢指標之完整心理健康型態群集分析","authors":"李玉嬋 李玉嬋, 方俊凱 方俊凱, 劉介宇 劉介宇, 張文翰 張文翰","doi":"10.53106/172851862024010069002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 本研究目的在了解正負向指標篩檢心理健康型態集群分佈情形,是否符合Keyes主張以主觀幸福感與憂鬱症狀雙指標區分的完整心理健康模式。研究設計以心理健康BMI幸福感問卷、病人健康狀況憂鬱問卷,做為正負向指標篩檢工具,架構完整心理健康模式;以問卷調查法立意取樣739份樣本,經群集分析法作統計分群。結果能區分出有意義的四群集,包括擁有高幸福低憂鬱之完整圓滿心理健康型態的「心盛型」群集(46.28%)、不完整心理健康型態三個群集:「冷靜型」(低幸福低憂鬱之不完整心理亞健康型態,31.94%)、「奮戰型」(高幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,11.10%)、「混沌型」(低幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,10.69%)。低憂鬱者佔全體 78.22%,其中59.17%擁有高幸福而處於完整圓滿心理健康型態;高憂鬱者佔全體21.78%,其中50.93%擁有高幸福感。驗證了幸福感、憂鬱傾向作為正負向心理健康指標,篩檢完整或不完整心理健康型態。建議:(1)高憂鬱者參照「奮戰型」這群人高幸福感來源,藉由參與社團獲得人際支持、找到工作及收入來增加自我價值感;(2)「冷靜型」不能單看低憂鬱的心理健康篩檢,需提升「友善人際支持 正念情緒平穩 認同自我價值意義」之正向心理健康BMI幸福感,以獲得完整心理健康;(3)未來研究可依據正負向心理健康指標去發展心理健康素養能力,作為心理健檢與自主管理完整心理健康之用。\n This study aimed to understand the cluster distribution of positive and negative indicators for screening mental health patterns and whether they conform to Keyes’ claim that positive and negative indicators should be included in the complete mental health state model. The positive mental health indicators included social, emotional, and psychological well-being, which should be measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Negative indicators measure the level of symptoms of mental illness concurrently, serving as a complete assessment of whether the individual is in a healthy state of positive and negative mental health indicators. Keyes employed these to distinguish four clusters of people with four mental health modes, of which the incomplete mental health cluster was in the state. Even if they have a negative mental illness, they could have positive mental health and well-being. Although some people do not have negative mental illness, they cannot have positive mental health and well-being. Therefore, Taiwanese scholar Li corresponded to these three well-being developments and selected three operational mental health skills: \"\"Befriend-Mindfulness-Identity\"\" as the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index questionnaire (mBMI). After using them to evaluate 739 people, it was evident that the scores of the above two questionnaires were significantly correlated, and the mBMI questionnaire total score and Questions B, M, and I could effectively predict the total score, social, emotional, and psychological well-being of the MHC-SF, with a total explanatory power of 30.3%. This test should be used as a simple screening for well-being and as a positive mental health screening tool. Additionally, a Depression Scale Screening Tool for Negative Mental Health Depression was combined to explore the complete mental health state model of Taiwanese people. \n Therefore, in this study, the mBMI questionnaire was selected as a simple tool to measure positive mental health well-being, and the patients’ health questionnaire for depression was used as a screening tool for negative mental health indicators. These are used as positive and negative indicators to test whether a complete or incomplete mental health state model fits. The questionnaire survey method was used to deliberately sample the data from 739 valid samples, and the cluster analysis method was used for statistical grouping to verify its suitability. According to the results of the aforementioned positive and negative indicators, four meaningful clusters were distinguished, including one complete and three incomplete mental health models. One cluster was \"\"Flourishing type\"\"(46.28%) of high well-being and low depression, which belonged to the complete mental health state model. The other three clusters were incomplete mental health state models. \"\"Fighting type\"\" (31.94%) of high well-being and high depression, \"\"Calm type\"\" (11.10%) of low well-being and low depression, and \"\"Chaos type\"\" (10.69%) of low well-being and high depression could fight for high well-being. It was verified that well-being and depression could be used as positive and negative mental health indicators to screen for complete or incomplete mental health state models. When we identified people with high depression, we encouraged them to refer to the source of high well-being of the \"\"fighting type\"\" group and increase their sense of self-worth by participating in clubs to obtain interpersonal support, find jobs, and earn income. We reminded the \"\"calm type\"\" people with low depression to promote their high well-being to have a complete mental health state. Finally, we monitored positive and negative indicators of mental health using screening tools of the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to screen for complete or incomplete mental health states as a reference for promoting positive and negative mental health. The befriend-mindfulness-identity skills should be improved to promote well-being and adjust depression to achieve complete mental health.\n \n","PeriodicalId":137633,"journal":{"name":"中華輔導與諮商學報","volume":"50 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"正負向心理健康篩檢指標之完整心理健康型態群集分析\",\"authors\":\"李玉嬋 李玉嬋, 方俊凱 方俊凱, 劉介宇 劉介宇, 張文翰 張文翰\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/172851862024010069002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 本研究目的在了解正負向指標篩檢心理健康型態集群分佈情形,是否符合Keyes主張以主觀幸福感與憂鬱症狀雙指標區分的完整心理健康模式。研究設計以心理健康BMI幸福感問卷、病人健康狀況憂鬱問卷,做為正負向指標篩檢工具,架構完整心理健康模式;以問卷調查法立意取樣739份樣本,經群集分析法作統計分群。結果能區分出有意義的四群集,包括擁有高幸福低憂鬱之完整圓滿心理健康型態的「心盛型」群集(46.28%)、不完整心理健康型態三個群集:「冷靜型」(低幸福低憂鬱之不完整心理亞健康型態,31.94%)、「奮戰型」(高幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,11.10%)、「混沌型」(低幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,10.69%)。低憂鬱者佔全體 78.22%,其中59.17%擁有高幸福而處於完整圓滿心理健康型態;高憂鬱者佔全體21.78%,其中50.93%擁有高幸福感。驗證了幸福感、憂鬱傾向作為正負向心理健康指標,篩檢完整或不完整心理健康型態。建議:(1)高憂鬱者參照「奮戰型」這群人高幸福感來源,藉由參與社團獲得人際支持、找到工作及收入來增加自我價值感;(2)「冷靜型」不能單看低憂鬱的心理健康篩檢,需提升「友善人際支持 正念情緒平穩 認同自我價值意義」之正向心理健康BMI幸福感,以獲得完整心理健康;(3)未來研究可依據正負向心理健康指標去發展心理健康素養能力,作為心理健檢與自主管理完整心理健康之用。\\n This study aimed to understand the cluster distribution of positive and negative indicators for screening mental health patterns and whether they conform to Keyes’ claim that positive and negative indicators should be included in the complete mental health state model. The positive mental health indicators included social, emotional, and psychological well-being, which should be measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Negative indicators measure the level of symptoms of mental illness concurrently, serving as a complete assessment of whether the individual is in a healthy state of positive and negative mental health indicators. Keyes employed these to distinguish four clusters of people with four mental health modes, of which the incomplete mental health cluster was in the state. Even if they have a negative mental illness, they could have positive mental health and well-being. Although some people do not have negative mental illness, they cannot have positive mental health and well-being. Therefore, Taiwanese scholar Li corresponded to these three well-being developments and selected three operational mental health skills: \\\"\\\"Befriend-Mindfulness-Identity\\\"\\\" as the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index questionnaire (mBMI). After using them to evaluate 739 people, it was evident that the scores of the above two questionnaires were significantly correlated, and the mBMI questionnaire total score and Questions B, M, and I could effectively predict the total score, social, emotional, and psychological well-being of the MHC-SF, with a total explanatory power of 30.3%. This test should be used as a simple screening for well-being and as a positive mental health screening tool. Additionally, a Depression Scale Screening Tool for Negative Mental Health Depression was combined to explore the complete mental health state model of Taiwanese people. \\n Therefore, in this study, the mBMI questionnaire was selected as a simple tool to measure positive mental health well-being, and the patients’ health questionnaire for depression was used as a screening tool for negative mental health indicators. These are used as positive and negative indicators to test whether a complete or incomplete mental health state model fits. The questionnaire survey method was used to deliberately sample the data from 739 valid samples, and the cluster analysis method was used for statistical grouping to verify its suitability. According to the results of the aforementioned positive and negative indicators, four meaningful clusters were distinguished, including one complete and three incomplete mental health models. One cluster was \\\"\\\"Flourishing type\\\"\\\"(46.28%) of high well-being and low depression, which belonged to the complete mental health state model. The other three clusters were incomplete mental health state models. \\\"\\\"Fighting type\\\"\\\" (31.94%) of high well-being and high depression, \\\"\\\"Calm type\\\"\\\" (11.10%) of low well-being and low depression, and \\\"\\\"Chaos type\\\"\\\" (10.69%) of low well-being and high depression could fight for high well-being. It was verified that well-being and depression could be used as positive and negative mental health indicators to screen for complete or incomplete mental health state models. When we identified people with high depression, we encouraged them to refer to the source of high well-being of the \\\"\\\"fighting type\\\"\\\" group and increase their sense of self-worth by participating in clubs to obtain interpersonal support, find jobs, and earn income. We reminded the \\\"\\\"calm type\\\"\\\" people with low depression to promote their high well-being to have a complete mental health state. Finally, we monitored positive and negative indicators of mental health using screening tools of the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to screen for complete or incomplete mental health states as a reference for promoting positive and negative mental health. The befriend-mindfulness-identity skills should be improved to promote well-being and adjust depression to achieve complete mental health.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":137633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中華輔導與諮商學報\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中華輔導與諮商學報\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/172851862024010069002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中華輔導與諮商學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172851862024010069002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究目的在了解正負向指標篩檢心理健康型態集群分佈情形,是否符合Keyes主張以主觀幸福感與憂鬱症狀雙指標區分的完整心理健康模式。研究設計以心理健康BMI幸福感問卷、病人健康狀況憂鬱問卷,做為正負向指標篩檢工具,架構完整心理健康模式;以問卷調查法立意取樣739份樣本,經群集分析法作統計分群。結果能區分出有意義的四個群集,包括擁有高幸福低憂鬱之完整圓滿心理健康型態的「心盛型」群集(46.28%)、不完整心理健康型态三個群集:「冷靜型」(低幸福低憂鬱之不完整心理亞健康型態,31.94%)、「奮戰型」(高幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,11.10%)、「混沌型」(低幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,10.69%)。低憂鬱者佔全體 78.22%,其中 59.17%擁有高幸福而處於完整圓滿心理健康型態;高憂鬱者佔全體 21.78%,其中 50.93%擁有高幸福感。驗證了幸福感、憂鬱傾向作為正負向心理健康指標,篩檢完整或不完整心理健康型態。建議:(1)高憂鬱者參照「奮戰型」這群人高幸福感來源,藉由參與社團獲得人際支持、找到工作及收入來增加自我價值感;(2)「冷靜型」不能單看低憂鬱的心理健康篩檢,需提升「友善人際支持 正念情緒平穩認同自我價值意義」之正向心理健康BMI幸福感,以獲得完整心理健康;(3)未來研究可依據正負向心理健康指標去發展心理健康素養能力,作為心理健檢與自主管理完整心理健康之用。本研究旨在了解筛查心理健康模式的积极和消极指标的群组分布,以及它们是否符合 Keyes 提出的完整心理健康状态模型应包括积极和消极指标的主张。积极心理健康指标包括社交、情感和心理健康,应使用心理健康连续简表(MHC-SF)进行测量。消极指标同时测量精神疾病的症状水平,作为对个人是否处于积极和消极心理健康指标的健康状态的完整评估。Keyes 利用这些来区分出四种心理健康模式的四个人群集群,其中不完全心理健康集群处于状态。即使他们患有消极的心理疾病,也可能拥有积极的心理健康和幸福感。有些人虽然没有消极的心理疾病,但也不可能有积极的心理健康和幸福感。因此,台湾学者李老师对应这三种幸福感的发展,选择了三种可操作的心理健康技能:"作为心理健康 BMI 幸福指数问卷(mBMI)。在对 739 人进行评估后发现,上述两份问卷的得分具有显著相关性,mBMI 问卷总分和问题 B、M、I 能有效预测 MHC-SF 的总分、社交、情感和心理健康,总解释力为 30.3%。该测试应被用作简单的幸福感筛查和积极的心理健康筛查工具。此外,还结合了消极心理健康抑郁量表筛查工具,以探索台湾人完整的心理健康状态模型。 因此,本研究选择了 mBMI 问卷作为测量积极心理健康幸福感的简单工具,而抑郁症患者健康问卷则作为消极心理健康指标的筛查工具。这些指标作为正负指标来检验是否符合完整或不完整的心理健康状态模型。采用问卷调查法特意抽取了 739 个有效样本的数据,并采用聚类分析法进行统计分组,以验证其适宜性。根据上述正负指标的结果,区分出四个有意义的聚类,包括一个完整的心理健康模型和三个不完整的心理健康模型。一个聚类是高幸福感和低抑郁的 "幸福型"(46.28%),属于完整的心理健康状态模式。其他三个群组属于不完全心理健康状态模式。"高幸福感和高抑郁的 "战斗型"(31.94%)、低幸福感和低抑郁的 "冷静型"(11.10%)、低幸福感和高抑郁的 "混乱型"(10.69%)可以争取高幸福感。研究证实,幸福感和抑郁可作为心理健康的正负指标,用于筛选完整或不完整的心理健康状态模型。当我们发现抑郁程度较高的人时,我们鼓励他们参考 "战斗型 "群体的高幸福感来源,通过参加社团活动获得人际支持、寻找工作和赚取收入来提高自我价值感。我们提醒抑郁程度较低的 "冷静型 "人群,要提升自己的高幸福感,拥有完整的心理健康状态。最后,我们利用心理健康BMI幸福指数和患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)的筛查工具监测心理健康的正负指标,筛查心理健康状态的完整与不完整,作为促进正负心理健康的参考。应提高 "结交-正念-认同 "技能,促进幸福感,调整抑郁情绪,以实现完整的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
正負向心理健康篩檢指標之完整心理健康型態群集分析
本研究目的在了解正負向指標篩檢心理健康型態集群分佈情形,是否符合Keyes主張以主觀幸福感與憂鬱症狀雙指標區分的完整心理健康模式。研究設計以心理健康BMI幸福感問卷、病人健康狀況憂鬱問卷,做為正負向指標篩檢工具,架構完整心理健康模式;以問卷調查法立意取樣739份樣本,經群集分析法作統計分群。結果能區分出有意義的四群集,包括擁有高幸福低憂鬱之完整圓滿心理健康型態的「心盛型」群集(46.28%)、不完整心理健康型態三個群集:「冷靜型」(低幸福低憂鬱之不完整心理亞健康型態,31.94%)、「奮戰型」(高幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,11.10%)、「混沌型」(低幸福高憂鬱之不完整心理健康型態,10.69%)。低憂鬱者佔全體 78.22%,其中59.17%擁有高幸福而處於完整圓滿心理健康型態;高憂鬱者佔全體21.78%,其中50.93%擁有高幸福感。驗證了幸福感、憂鬱傾向作為正負向心理健康指標,篩檢完整或不完整心理健康型態。建議:(1)高憂鬱者參照「奮戰型」這群人高幸福感來源,藉由參與社團獲得人際支持、找到工作及收入來增加自我價值感;(2)「冷靜型」不能單看低憂鬱的心理健康篩檢,需提升「友善人際支持 正念情緒平穩 認同自我價值意義」之正向心理健康BMI幸福感,以獲得完整心理健康;(3)未來研究可依據正負向心理健康指標去發展心理健康素養能力,作為心理健檢與自主管理完整心理健康之用。  This study aimed to understand the cluster distribution of positive and negative indicators for screening mental health patterns and whether they conform to Keyes’ claim that positive and negative indicators should be included in the complete mental health state model. The positive mental health indicators included social, emotional, and psychological well-being, which should be measured using the Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Negative indicators measure the level of symptoms of mental illness concurrently, serving as a complete assessment of whether the individual is in a healthy state of positive and negative mental health indicators. Keyes employed these to distinguish four clusters of people with four mental health modes, of which the incomplete mental health cluster was in the state. Even if they have a negative mental illness, they could have positive mental health and well-being. Although some people do not have negative mental illness, they cannot have positive mental health and well-being. Therefore, Taiwanese scholar Li corresponded to these three well-being developments and selected three operational mental health skills: ""Befriend-Mindfulness-Identity"" as the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index questionnaire (mBMI). After using them to evaluate 739 people, it was evident that the scores of the above two questionnaires were significantly correlated, and the mBMI questionnaire total score and Questions B, M, and I could effectively predict the total score, social, emotional, and psychological well-being of the MHC-SF, with a total explanatory power of 30.3%. This test should be used as a simple screening for well-being and as a positive mental health screening tool. Additionally, a Depression Scale Screening Tool for Negative Mental Health Depression was combined to explore the complete mental health state model of Taiwanese people. Therefore, in this study, the mBMI questionnaire was selected as a simple tool to measure positive mental health well-being, and the patients’ health questionnaire for depression was used as a screening tool for negative mental health indicators. These are used as positive and negative indicators to test whether a complete or incomplete mental health state model fits. The questionnaire survey method was used to deliberately sample the data from 739 valid samples, and the cluster analysis method was used for statistical grouping to verify its suitability. According to the results of the aforementioned positive and negative indicators, four meaningful clusters were distinguished, including one complete and three incomplete mental health models. One cluster was ""Flourishing type""(46.28%) of high well-being and low depression, which belonged to the complete mental health state model. The other three clusters were incomplete mental health state models. ""Fighting type"" (31.94%) of high well-being and high depression, ""Calm type"" (11.10%) of low well-being and low depression, and ""Chaos type"" (10.69%) of low well-being and high depression could fight for high well-being. It was verified that well-being and depression could be used as positive and negative mental health indicators to screen for complete or incomplete mental health state models. When we identified people with high depression, we encouraged them to refer to the source of high well-being of the ""fighting type"" group and increase their sense of self-worth by participating in clubs to obtain interpersonal support, find jobs, and earn income. We reminded the ""calm type"" people with low depression to promote their high well-being to have a complete mental health state. Finally, we monitored positive and negative indicators of mental health using screening tools of the Mental Health BMI Well-Being Index and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to screen for complete or incomplete mental health states as a reference for promoting positive and negative mental health. The befriend-mindfulness-identity skills should be improved to promote well-being and adjust depression to achieve complete mental health.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信