布拉柴维尔大学医院股骨干骨折的骨合成术:钢钉与螺钉钢板

Kevin Parfait Bienvenu Bouhelo-pam, Arnauld Sledje Wilfrid Bilongo-bouyou, Paul Yèlai Ikounga, Marc Fabrice Nkoua, Richard Ngobo, Moïse Radam Ellah, Marius Monka
{"title":"布拉柴维尔大学医院股骨干骨折的骨合成术:钢钉与螺钉钢板","authors":"Kevin Parfait Bienvenu Bouhelo-pam, Arnauld Sledje Wilfrid Bilongo-bouyou, Paul Yèlai Ikounga, Marc Fabrice Nkoua, Richard Ngobo, Moïse Radam Ellah, Marius Monka","doi":"10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fractures of the femoral shaft are serious traumatic conditions frequently encountered in hospital. The aim of our study was to compare two different surgical techniques for their treatment: anterograde centromedullary nail and compression plate. Materials and Methods: From September 2018 to August 2023, 208 femoral shaft fractures were recorded out of 3236 hospitalizations, i.e. 6.42%. Two groups of patients were selected: group 1 with 122 patients treated with anterograde nails and group 2 with 49 patients treated with screw plates. These two groups were compared according to fracture type (AO/OTA), time to surgery, follow-up and consolidation, and complications. Data were processed in Excel and SPSS 19.0 with significant p-value when less than or equal to 0.05. Results: The time to surgery was 29.11±1.13 days for group 1 and 27.74±2.41 days for group 2 (p=0.0005). Most of the patients were treated in the middle third (78.68% in group 1 and 65.3% in group 2). Bone consolidation was achieved at 4.91±0.52 months for group 1 and 5.72±0.34 months for group 2 (p=0.000007). The main complication was limb length inequality in 6 cases (4.92%) in group 1 and 9 cases (18.36%) in group 2. Discussion: Although our study was monocentric, it was carried out in the largest hospital in the country. The middle third was the most frequent site for us, as it was for most authors. This is the area most exposed to high-energy trauma and torsional forces. Complications are due to delayed surgery and unfavourable operating conditions. Conclusion: Comparing the two main surgical techniques, the results are better for the anterograde femoral centromedullary nail. The choice of implant depends on the type of fracture, the surgeon's habits and the implants available.","PeriodicalId":14302,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","volume":"288 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteosynthesis of femoral shaft fractures at Brazzaville University Hospital: Nail versus screw plate\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Parfait Bienvenu Bouhelo-pam, Arnauld Sledje Wilfrid Bilongo-bouyou, Paul Yèlai Ikounga, Marc Fabrice Nkoua, Richard Ngobo, Moïse Radam Ellah, Marius Monka\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Fractures of the femoral shaft are serious traumatic conditions frequently encountered in hospital. The aim of our study was to compare two different surgical techniques for their treatment: anterograde centromedullary nail and compression plate. Materials and Methods: From September 2018 to August 2023, 208 femoral shaft fractures were recorded out of 3236 hospitalizations, i.e. 6.42%. Two groups of patients were selected: group 1 with 122 patients treated with anterograde nails and group 2 with 49 patients treated with screw plates. These two groups were compared according to fracture type (AO/OTA), time to surgery, follow-up and consolidation, and complications. Data were processed in Excel and SPSS 19.0 with significant p-value when less than or equal to 0.05. Results: The time to surgery was 29.11±1.13 days for group 1 and 27.74±2.41 days for group 2 (p=0.0005). Most of the patients were treated in the middle third (78.68% in group 1 and 65.3% in group 2). Bone consolidation was achieved at 4.91±0.52 months for group 1 and 5.72±0.34 months for group 2 (p=0.000007). The main complication was limb length inequality in 6 cases (4.92%) in group 1 and 9 cases (18.36%) in group 2. Discussion: Although our study was monocentric, it was carried out in the largest hospital in the country. The middle third was the most frequent site for us, as it was for most authors. This is the area most exposed to high-energy trauma and torsional forces. Complications are due to delayed surgery and unfavourable operating conditions. Conclusion: Comparing the two main surgical techniques, the results are better for the anterograde femoral centromedullary nail. The choice of implant depends on the type of fracture, the surgeon's habits and the implants available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"volume\":\"288 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2024.v10.i1b.3504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介股骨干骨折是医院经常遇到的严重创伤。我们的研究旨在比较两种不同的手术治疗方法:前向中心髓内钉和加压钢板。材料与方法:从 2018 年 9 月至 2023 年 8 月,在 3236 例住院患者中记录了 208 例股骨干骨折,占 6.42%。选取两组患者:第一组 122 名患者采用前行钉治疗,第二组 49 名患者采用螺钉钢板治疗。根据骨折类型(AO/OTA)、手术时间、随访和巩固治疗以及并发症对两组患者进行比较。数据用 Excel 和 SPSS 19.0 进行处理,当 P 值小于或等于 0.05 时,P 值显著。结果第一组的手术时间为(29.11±1.13)天,第二组为(27.74±2.41)天(P=0.0005)。大多数患者在中三分之一处接受治疗(第一组为 78.68%,第二组为 65.3%)。第一组在 4.91±0.52 个月时达到骨质巩固,第二组在 5.72±0.34 个月时达到骨质巩固(P=0.000007)。主要并发症是肢体长度不等,第一组有 6 例(4.92%),第二组有 9 例(18.36%)。讨论:虽然我们的研究是单中心的,但它是在全国最大的医院进行的。对我们来说,中三分之一是最常见的部位,对大多数作者来说也是如此。这是最容易受到高能量创伤和扭转力影响的部位。并发症是由于手术延迟和不利的手术条件造成的。结论比较两种主要的手术方法,股骨前路髓内钉的效果更好。植入物的选择取决于骨折类型、外科医生的习惯和可用的植入物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteosynthesis of femoral shaft fractures at Brazzaville University Hospital: Nail versus screw plate
Introduction: Fractures of the femoral shaft are serious traumatic conditions frequently encountered in hospital. The aim of our study was to compare two different surgical techniques for their treatment: anterograde centromedullary nail and compression plate. Materials and Methods: From September 2018 to August 2023, 208 femoral shaft fractures were recorded out of 3236 hospitalizations, i.e. 6.42%. Two groups of patients were selected: group 1 with 122 patients treated with anterograde nails and group 2 with 49 patients treated with screw plates. These two groups were compared according to fracture type (AO/OTA), time to surgery, follow-up and consolidation, and complications. Data were processed in Excel and SPSS 19.0 with significant p-value when less than or equal to 0.05. Results: The time to surgery was 29.11±1.13 days for group 1 and 27.74±2.41 days for group 2 (p=0.0005). Most of the patients were treated in the middle third (78.68% in group 1 and 65.3% in group 2). Bone consolidation was achieved at 4.91±0.52 months for group 1 and 5.72±0.34 months for group 2 (p=0.000007). The main complication was limb length inequality in 6 cases (4.92%) in group 1 and 9 cases (18.36%) in group 2. Discussion: Although our study was monocentric, it was carried out in the largest hospital in the country. The middle third was the most frequent site for us, as it was for most authors. This is the area most exposed to high-energy trauma and torsional forces. Complications are due to delayed surgery and unfavourable operating conditions. Conclusion: Comparing the two main surgical techniques, the results are better for the anterograde femoral centromedullary nail. The choice of implant depends on the type of fracture, the surgeon's habits and the implants available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信