Thomas Sardesai, Laura Hobbs, Caroline Phillips, Tom Bashford, Katharina Kohler, Daniel Stubbs
{"title":"研究预测手术当天取消手术(DOSC)的工作:系统性审查协议","authors":"Thomas Sardesai, Laura Hobbs, Caroline Phillips, Tom Bashford, Katharina Kohler, Daniel Stubbs","doi":"10.1093/jsprm/snae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.","PeriodicalId":93590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","volume":"288 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Sardesai, Laura Hobbs, Caroline Phillips, Tom Bashford, Katharina Kohler, Daniel Stubbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsprm/snae001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies\",\"volume\":\"288 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snae001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical protocols and research methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsprm/snae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全球约有 18% 的择期手术会在手术当天取消。这影响了患者的身体健康、心理健康和社会功能。进一步的影响包括降低医疗服务效率和更广泛的经济生产力。导致这一现象的变量有很多,包括患者因素、资源限制和医疗服务压力,这些都可以纳入预测模型。本文介绍了一项系统性综述的协议,以评估经同行评审的原创研究文章和预测 DOSC 模型的实施研究。此类统计模型如果能恰当地融入临床实践,将为患者和医疗服务提供者带来益处。该系统性综述将对这一领域的证据进行全面综合,为今后建立黄金标准统计模型提供参考。预测因子查找研究、同一模型的后续出版物以及未披露预测变量的出版物将被排除在外。将在 Medline、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of science 中进行检索。将使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具对偏倚风险进行评估。将收集有关所含变量、预测方法、预测是在患者层面还是在系统层面进行以及培训和评估过程的数据。这些数据将进行定性综合,并用于生成叙述性摘要和图表。本系统综述将遵守 2020 年 PRISMA 指南。本综述已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42023478984。
Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol
Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.