学术交流的学与教:研究生和导师的调查结果

C. Hurrell, Susan Beatty, James E. Murphy, Dana Cramer, Jennifer Lee, Caitlin McClurg
{"title":"学术交流的学与教:研究生和导师的调查结果","authors":"C. Hurrell, Susan Beatty, James E. Murphy, Dana Cramer, Jennifer Lee, Caitlin McClurg","doi":"10.1353/pla.2024.a916991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Graduate students are increasingly expected to publish peer-reviewed scholarship during the course of their studies, yet predictable mentoring and education on academic publishing is not available to all graduate students. Although academic librarians are well positioned to offer such instruction, their efforts are not always informed by comprehensive investigations of what, and how, graduate students need to learn. This study used focus groups with graduate students and faculty mentors to explore strengths and gaps in current mentoring and learning practices, while also discovering and uncovering suggestions and opportunities for further development in education about scholarly publishing. Thematic analysis of the data revealed that current training and mentorship meet some, but not all, of students' needs and preferences. Future library instruction should employ a blended and compassionate approach to teaching about this complex topic, and this study offers a way forward as librarians-as-partners in scholarly communication.","PeriodicalId":516609,"journal":{"name":"portal: Libraries and the Academy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning and Teaching about Scholarly Communication: Findings from Graduate Students and Mentors\",\"authors\":\"C. Hurrell, Susan Beatty, James E. Murphy, Dana Cramer, Jennifer Lee, Caitlin McClurg\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pla.2024.a916991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Graduate students are increasingly expected to publish peer-reviewed scholarship during the course of their studies, yet predictable mentoring and education on academic publishing is not available to all graduate students. Although academic librarians are well positioned to offer such instruction, their efforts are not always informed by comprehensive investigations of what, and how, graduate students need to learn. This study used focus groups with graduate students and faculty mentors to explore strengths and gaps in current mentoring and learning practices, while also discovering and uncovering suggestions and opportunities for further development in education about scholarly publishing. Thematic analysis of the data revealed that current training and mentorship meet some, but not all, of students' needs and preferences. Future library instruction should employ a blended and compassionate approach to teaching about this complex topic, and this study offers a way forward as librarians-as-partners in scholarly communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"portal: Libraries and the Academy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"portal: Libraries and the Academy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2024.a916991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"portal: Libraries and the Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2024.a916991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:越来越多的研究生被要求在学习期间发表经过同行评议的学术论文,然而并不是所有的研究生都能得到可预见的学术出版方面的指导和教育。尽管学术图书馆员完全有能力提供这样的指导,但他们的努力并不总是基于对研究生需要学习什么以及如何学习的全面调查。本研究通过与研究生和导师的焦点小组来探讨当前指导和学习实践中的优势和不足,同时也发现和发掘进一步发展学术出版教育的建议和机会。对数据的主题分析表明,当前的培训和指导满足了学生的部分需求和偏好,但并非全部。未来的图书馆教学应该采用一种混合的、富有同情心的方法来教授这一复杂的主题,本研究为图书馆员作为学术交流的合作伙伴提供了一条前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning and Teaching about Scholarly Communication: Findings from Graduate Students and Mentors
abstract:Graduate students are increasingly expected to publish peer-reviewed scholarship during the course of their studies, yet predictable mentoring and education on academic publishing is not available to all graduate students. Although academic librarians are well positioned to offer such instruction, their efforts are not always informed by comprehensive investigations of what, and how, graduate students need to learn. This study used focus groups with graduate students and faculty mentors to explore strengths and gaps in current mentoring and learning practices, while also discovering and uncovering suggestions and opportunities for further development in education about scholarly publishing. Thematic analysis of the data revealed that current training and mentorship meet some, but not all, of students' needs and preferences. Future library instruction should employ a blended and compassionate approach to teaching about this complex topic, and this study offers a way forward as librarians-as-partners in scholarly communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信