在基于电子病历的临床决策支持系统中应用用户体验设计方法

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emily Gao, Ilana Radpavar, Emma J Clark, Gery W. Ryan, Mindy K. Ross
{"title":"在基于电子病历的临床决策支持系统中应用用户体验设计方法","authors":"Emily Gao, Ilana Radpavar, Emma J Clark, Gery W. Ryan, Mindy K. Ross","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n We applied a user experience (UX) design approach to clinical decision support (CDS) tool development for the specific use case of pediatric asthma. Our objective was to understand physicians’ workflows, decision-making processes, barriers (ie, pain points), and facilitators to increase usability of the tool.\n \n \n \n We used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews and surveys. The coded interviews were synthesized into physician-user journey maps (ie, visualization of a process to accomplish goals) and personas (ie, user types). Interviews were conducted via video. We developed physician journey maps and user personas informed by their goals, systems interactions, and experiences with pediatric asthma management.\n \n \n \n The physician end-user personas identified were: efficiency, relationship, and learning. Features of a potential asthma CDS tool sought varied by physician practice type and persona. It was important to the physician end-user that the asthma CDS tool demonstrate value by lowering workflow friction (ie, difficulty or obstacles), improving the environment surrounding physicians and patients, and using it as a teaching tool. Customizability versus standardization were important considerations for uptake.\n \n \n \n Different values and motivations of physicians influence their use and interaction with the EHR and CDS tools. These different perspectives can be captured by applying a UX design approach to the development process. For example, with the importance of customizability, one approach may be to build a core module with variations depending on end-user preference.\n \n \n \n A UX approach can drive design to help understand physician-users and meet their needs; ultimately with the goal of increased uptake.\n","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a user experience design approach for an EHR-based clinical decision support system\",\"authors\":\"Emily Gao, Ilana Radpavar, Emma J Clark, Gery W. Ryan, Mindy K. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n We applied a user experience (UX) design approach to clinical decision support (CDS) tool development for the specific use case of pediatric asthma. Our objective was to understand physicians’ workflows, decision-making processes, barriers (ie, pain points), and facilitators to increase usability of the tool.\\n \\n \\n \\n We used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews and surveys. The coded interviews were synthesized into physician-user journey maps (ie, visualization of a process to accomplish goals) and personas (ie, user types). Interviews were conducted via video. We developed physician journey maps and user personas informed by their goals, systems interactions, and experiences with pediatric asthma management.\\n \\n \\n \\n The physician end-user personas identified were: efficiency, relationship, and learning. Features of a potential asthma CDS tool sought varied by physician practice type and persona. It was important to the physician end-user that the asthma CDS tool demonstrate value by lowering workflow friction (ie, difficulty or obstacles), improving the environment surrounding physicians and patients, and using it as a teaching tool. Customizability versus standardization were important considerations for uptake.\\n \\n \\n \\n Different values and motivations of physicians influence their use and interaction with the EHR and CDS tools. These different perspectives can be captured by applying a UX design approach to the development process. For example, with the importance of customizability, one approach may be to build a core module with variations depending on end-user preference.\\n \\n \\n \\n A UX approach can drive design to help understand physician-users and meet their needs; ultimately with the goal of increased uptake.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将用户体验(UX)设计方法应用于临床决策支持(CDS)工具的开发,用于儿科哮喘的特定使用案例。我们的目标是了解医生的工作流程、决策过程、障碍(即痛点)和促进因素,以提高工具的可用性。 我们采用了半结构式访谈和调查的混合方法。我们将经过编码的访谈内容归纳为医生-用户旅程图(即实现目标过程的可视化)和角色(即用户类型)。访谈通过视频进行。我们根据医生的目标、系统交互和儿科哮喘管理经验,绘制了医生用户旅程图和用户角色。 确定的医生最终用户角色包括:效率、关系和学习。潜在哮喘 CDS 工具的功能因医生的实践类型和角色而异。对医生最终用户来说,重要的是哮喘 CDS 工具能通过降低工作流程的摩擦(即困难或障碍)、改善医生和患者周围的环境以及将其用作教学工具来体现价值。可定制性与标准化是吸收的重要考虑因素。 医生的不同价值观和动机影响着他们对电子病历和 CDS 工具的使用和互动。在开发过程中采用用户体验设计方法可以捕捉到这些不同的观点。例如,考虑到可定制性的重要性,一种方法可能是建立一个核心模块,并根据最终用户的偏好加以变化。 用户体验方法可以推动设计工作,帮助了解医生用户并满足他们的需求;最终达到提高使用率的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of a user experience design approach for an EHR-based clinical decision support system
We applied a user experience (UX) design approach to clinical decision support (CDS) tool development for the specific use case of pediatric asthma. Our objective was to understand physicians’ workflows, decision-making processes, barriers (ie, pain points), and facilitators to increase usability of the tool. We used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews and surveys. The coded interviews were synthesized into physician-user journey maps (ie, visualization of a process to accomplish goals) and personas (ie, user types). Interviews were conducted via video. We developed physician journey maps and user personas informed by their goals, systems interactions, and experiences with pediatric asthma management. The physician end-user personas identified were: efficiency, relationship, and learning. Features of a potential asthma CDS tool sought varied by physician practice type and persona. It was important to the physician end-user that the asthma CDS tool demonstrate value by lowering workflow friction (ie, difficulty or obstacles), improving the environment surrounding physicians and patients, and using it as a teaching tool. Customizability versus standardization were important considerations for uptake. Different values and motivations of physicians influence their use and interaction with the EHR and CDS tools. These different perspectives can be captured by applying a UX design approach to the development process. For example, with the importance of customizability, one approach may be to build a core module with variations depending on end-user preference. A UX approach can drive design to help understand physician-users and meet their needs; ultimately with the goal of increased uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信