{"title":"平行故事:德米特里厄斯-坎特米尔和弗朗西斯二世-拉科茨","authors":"Ștefan Lemny","doi":"10.33993/tr.2023.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various \noutstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his \nillustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the \ntwo neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between \nthe Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities \nis not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other, \nbut their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they \nexperienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and \nshared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place \namong the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their \npolitical action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and \nthe adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed \nthem to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities \nmay therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to \nbetter highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.","PeriodicalId":23235,"journal":{"name":"Transylvanian Review","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi\",\"authors\":\"Ștefan Lemny\",\"doi\":\"10.33993/tr.2023.3.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various \\noutstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his \\nillustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the \\ntwo neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between \\nthe Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities \\nis not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other, \\nbut their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they \\nexperienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and \\nshared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place \\namong the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their \\npolitical action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and \\nthe adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed \\nthem to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities \\nmay therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to \\nbetter highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transylvanian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi
In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various
outstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his
illustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the
two neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between
the Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities
is not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other,
but their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they
experienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and
shared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place
among the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their
political action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and
the adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed
them to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities
may therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to
better highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.
期刊介绍:
Scientific periodical of the Center for Transylvanian Studies, the Transylvanian Review quarterly is published exclusively in widely spoken languages (English, French, German, Italian) and regularly sent to nearly 200 Romanian and foreign libraries. Transylvanian Review is a peer reviewed journal, with evaluators selected from reputable specialists in their field. Transylvanian Review features studies, articles, debates and book reviews pertaining to various cultural fields, with direct reference to Transylvania, seen as a multicultural space of ethnic, linguistic, religious contacts.