平行故事:德米特里厄斯-坎特米尔和弗朗西斯二世-拉科茨

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY
Ștefan Lemny
{"title":"平行故事:德米特里厄斯-坎特米尔和弗朗西斯二世-拉科茨","authors":"Ștefan Lemny","doi":"10.33993/tr.2023.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various \noutstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his \nillustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the \ntwo neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between \nthe Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities \nis not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other, \nbut their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they \nexperienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and \nshared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place \namong the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their \npolitical action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and \nthe adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed \nthem to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities \nmay therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to \nbetter highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.","PeriodicalId":23235,"journal":{"name":"Transylvanian Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi\",\"authors\":\"Ștefan Lemny\",\"doi\":\"10.33993/tr.2023.3.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various \\noutstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his \\nillustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the \\ntwo neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between \\nthe Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities \\nis not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other, \\nbut their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they \\nexperienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and \\nshared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place \\namong the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their \\npolitical action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and \\nthe adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed \\nthem to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities \\nmay therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to \\nbetter highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transylvanian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transylvanian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.3.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

继旨在将德米特里厄斯-坎特米尔(1673-1723 年)与各种杰出的政治和文化名人进行比较的研究之后,本研究提出了与其杰出的同时代特兰西瓦尼亚王子弗朗西斯二世-拉科茨(1676-1735 年)进行比较的演讲。两位王子分别统治着摩尔达维亚和特兰西瓦尼亚这两个相邻的公国,在奥斯曼帝国、俄罗斯帝国和奥地利帝国争夺该地区统治权的背景下,他们在欧洲政治层面脱颖而出。这种对两位人物进行比较的方法并非基于两位主人公各自如何看待对方的一致证词,但他们的生活却给出了许多这样做的理由。他们代表了两种不同的王室传统,却经历了同样的童年苦难,父母中的一方去世了,而他们却有着同样的抱负,那就是接受卓越的教育,从而在当时的知识精英中占据一席之地。他们的个性在许多方面都更接近于他们的政治行动,尤其是为赢得公国独立而进行的斗争和流亡的冒险。然而,没有什么比他们的思想工作更能说明问题了,他们的思想工作让他们在当时的文艺共和国获得了认可,随后又在文化理论界获得了认可,远远超越了他们的公国边界。因此,为了更好地了解他们在向现代过渡的重要时刻在卡帕多-达努比亚公国历史上所扮演的角色,并更好地突出德米特里厄斯-坎特米尔丰富的思想作品,对这两位人物进行比较分析可能会很有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Histoires parallèles: Démétrius Cantemir et François II Rákóczi
In the wake of the work aimed at comparing Demetrius Cantemir (1673?–1723) with various outstanding political and cultural personalities, this study proposes a comparative lecture with his illustrious contemporary Transylvanian Prince Francis II Rákóczi (1676–1735). Reigning in the two neighbouring principalities of Moldavia and Transylvania, the two princes stand out at Euro pean political level in the context of confrontations for the domination of this region between the Ottoman, Russian and Austrian empires. This comparative approach to the two personalities is not based on consistent testimonies of how each of the two protagonists considered the other, but their lives give many reasons for doing it. Representing two different princely traditions, they experienced the same hardships of a childhood marked by the death of one of their parents, and shared the same ambition for an exceptional education that provided them a prestigious place among the intellectual elites of the time. Their personalities are closer in many respects to their political action, particularly through the struggle to win independence for their principalities and the adventure of exile. Nothing, however, is as revealing as their intellectual work, which allowed them to gain recognition in the Republic of Letters of the time and, subsequently, in cultural his tory, far beyond boundaries of their principalities. A comparative analysis of the two personalities may therefore be of interest in order to better understand their role in the history of the Carpa tho-Danubian principalities at an important moment in the transition to the modern era, and to better highlight the exceptional richness of Demetrius Cantemir’s intellectual work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Scientific periodical of the Center for Transylvanian Studies, the Transylvanian Review quarterly is published exclusively in widely spoken languages (English, French, German, Italian) and regularly sent to nearly 200 Romanian and foreign libraries. Transylvanian Review is a peer reviewed journal, with evaluators selected from reputable specialists in their field. Transylvanian Review features studies, articles, debates and book reviews pertaining to various cultural fields, with direct reference to Transylvania, seen as a multicultural space of ethnic, linguistic, religious contacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信