灾难与浩劫:对文学研究的贡献

Margens Pub Date : 2024-01-27 DOI:10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10626
Irisvaldo Laurindo de Souza
{"title":"灾难与浩劫:对文学研究的贡献","authors":"Irisvaldo Laurindo de Souza","doi":"10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the concepts of disaster and catastrophe from the perspective of literary theory. It also reflects on testimony as an expression of both in contemporary literature. The paper argues that disaster and catastrophe are interrelated paradigms but argues that there is a point of schism between them: the possibility of reversal of material and psychosocial impacts and damage underlying disaster, and the explicit impossibility of social reality returning to how it was before a catastrophe. By implying solidarity between individuals and communities, as well as state relief of the victims, the disaster is inscribed in the framework of otherness. The framework of the catastrophe, on the other hand, is that of barbarism, a consequence of the permanent state of exception in modernity. The authors of reference are Adorno and Horkheimer (1985), Agamben (2004), Benjamin (2012), Hobsbawm (2013), Löwy (2000), Quarantelli (2015), Seligmann-Silva (2000; 2003; 2005; 2018), Ginzburg (2010), and Sarmento-Pantoja (2014).","PeriodicalId":485215,"journal":{"name":"Margens","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DESASTRE E CATÁSTROFE: UMA CONSTRIBUIÇÃO PARA OS ESTUDOS LITERÁRIOS\",\"authors\":\"Irisvaldo Laurindo de Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the concepts of disaster and catastrophe from the perspective of literary theory. It also reflects on testimony as an expression of both in contemporary literature. The paper argues that disaster and catastrophe are interrelated paradigms but argues that there is a point of schism between them: the possibility of reversal of material and psychosocial impacts and damage underlying disaster, and the explicit impossibility of social reality returning to how it was before a catastrophe. By implying solidarity between individuals and communities, as well as state relief of the victims, the disaster is inscribed in the framework of otherness. The framework of the catastrophe, on the other hand, is that of barbarism, a consequence of the permanent state of exception in modernity. The authors of reference are Adorno and Horkheimer (1985), Agamben (2004), Benjamin (2012), Hobsbawm (2013), Löwy (2000), Quarantelli (2015), Seligmann-Silva (2000; 2003; 2005; 2018), Ginzburg (2010), and Sarmento-Pantoja (2014).\",\"PeriodicalId\":485215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Margens\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Margens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10626\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Margens","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18542/rmi.v17i29.10626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从文学理论的角度讨论了灾难和灾变的概念。本文还反思了当代文学中作为这两个概念表现形式的证词。本文认为,灾害和灾难是相互关联的范式,但认为二者之间存在一个分裂点:灾害所带来的物质和社会心理影响和损害有可能逆转,而社会现实显然不可能恢复到灾难发生之前的状态。灾难意味着个人和社区之间的团结,以及国家对灾民的救济,因此灾难被刻画在他者性的框架中。另一方面,灾难的框架是野蛮的框架,是现代性永久例外状态的结果。参考作者包括阿多诺和霍克海默(1985 年)、阿甘本(2004 年)、本雅明(2012 年)、霍布斯鲍姆(2013 年)、洛维(2000 年)、夸兰特利(2015 年)、塞利格曼-席尔瓦(2000 年;2003 年;2005 年;2018 年)、金兹伯格(2010 年)和萨门托-潘托亚(2014 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DESASTRE E CATÁSTROFE: UMA CONSTRIBUIÇÃO PARA OS ESTUDOS LITERÁRIOS
This paper discusses the concepts of disaster and catastrophe from the perspective of literary theory. It also reflects on testimony as an expression of both in contemporary literature. The paper argues that disaster and catastrophe are interrelated paradigms but argues that there is a point of schism between them: the possibility of reversal of material and psychosocial impacts and damage underlying disaster, and the explicit impossibility of social reality returning to how it was before a catastrophe. By implying solidarity between individuals and communities, as well as state relief of the victims, the disaster is inscribed in the framework of otherness. The framework of the catastrophe, on the other hand, is that of barbarism, a consequence of the permanent state of exception in modernity. The authors of reference are Adorno and Horkheimer (1985), Agamben (2004), Benjamin (2012), Hobsbawm (2013), Löwy (2000), Quarantelli (2015), Seligmann-Silva (2000; 2003; 2005; 2018), Ginzburg (2010), and Sarmento-Pantoja (2014).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信