在一年级和三年级医学生中应用跨专业教育:横断面研究

D. Perwitasari, Faridah Baroroh, Andriana Sari, Putri Rachma Novitasari, Nurul Kodriati, Ratu Matahari, Barkah Djaka Purwanto
{"title":"在一年级和三年级医学生中应用跨专业教育:横断面研究","authors":"D. Perwitasari, Faridah Baroroh, Andriana Sari, Putri Rachma Novitasari, Nurul Kodriati, Ratu Matahari, Barkah Djaka Purwanto","doi":"10.12928/pharmaciana.v13i3.27253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health professions work together to provide the best service in health care facilities by collaborating with patients, families, worker and the community. Interprofessional education (IPE) were practice of collaboration between two or more students from different health profession programs . The purpose of study was to compare IPE results from first and third year batches. The two batches included 345 first-year students and 460 third-year students, from three different health disciplines, including medicine, pharmacy, and public health. These students met for four weeks to increase interprofessional collaboration, improve communication skills, foster respect and increase knowledge of the various roles each discipline, especially case management, conflict management and team work. Before IPE program, the students were given pre-questionnaire to assess their prior understanding of IPE. Each group of first-year students presented the outcomes of their discussions in the fourth week, while the third-year students created a poster about the subject and presented it in the second week. The students complete the program and post-questionnaire after their presentation. The International Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey served the development the IPE questionnaire (ICCAS). The result of pre-IPE domains’ score revealed substantial disparities in the team work domain, with third-year students score was lower than the first students, whereas first-year students had the highest score in the most of IPE categories, unless collaboration and conflict management (p>0.05). The post-IPE domains’ score showed significant differences in all of the domains. Most of the IPE domains had higher score in first year students, excluding communication and team work.","PeriodicalId":20051,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaciana","volume":"151 3-4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interprofessional education applied in first-year and third-year health students: cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"D. Perwitasari, Faridah Baroroh, Andriana Sari, Putri Rachma Novitasari, Nurul Kodriati, Ratu Matahari, Barkah Djaka Purwanto\",\"doi\":\"10.12928/pharmaciana.v13i3.27253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health professions work together to provide the best service in health care facilities by collaborating with patients, families, worker and the community. Interprofessional education (IPE) were practice of collaboration between two or more students from different health profession programs . The purpose of study was to compare IPE results from first and third year batches. The two batches included 345 first-year students and 460 third-year students, from three different health disciplines, including medicine, pharmacy, and public health. These students met for four weeks to increase interprofessional collaboration, improve communication skills, foster respect and increase knowledge of the various roles each discipline, especially case management, conflict management and team work. Before IPE program, the students were given pre-questionnaire to assess their prior understanding of IPE. Each group of first-year students presented the outcomes of their discussions in the fourth week, while the third-year students created a poster about the subject and presented it in the second week. The students complete the program and post-questionnaire after their presentation. The International Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey served the development the IPE questionnaire (ICCAS). The result of pre-IPE domains’ score revealed substantial disparities in the team work domain, with third-year students score was lower than the first students, whereas first-year students had the highest score in the most of IPE categories, unless collaboration and conflict management (p>0.05). The post-IPE domains’ score showed significant differences in all of the domains. Most of the IPE domains had higher score in first year students, excluding communication and team work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaciana\",\"volume\":\"151 3-4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaciana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12928/pharmaciana.v13i3.27253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaciana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/pharmaciana.v13i3.27253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生专业人员通过与病人、家属、工人和社区合作,共同为医疗机构提供最佳服务。跨专业教育(IPE)是两个或两个以上来自不同卫生专业的学生之间的合作实践。本研究的目的是比较一年级和三年级的 IPE 结果。两批学生包括 345 名一年级学生和 460 名三年级学生,分别来自医学、药学和公共卫生等三个不同的卫生学科。这些学生举行了为期四周的会议,以加强跨专业合作,提高沟通技巧,培养尊重,并增加对各学科各种角色的了解,特别是病例管理、冲突管理和团队工作。在开展 IPE 计划之前,学生们接受了预先问卷调查,以评估他们之前对 IPE 的理解。每组一年级学生都在第四周展示了他们的讨论成果,而三年级学生则在第二周制作了有关该主题的海报并进行了展示。学生们在展示后完成项目和后期问卷。国际合作能力成就调查(ICCAS)为 IPE 问卷的编制提供了帮助。IPE前各领域的得分结果显示,在团队工作领域,三年级学生的得分低于一年级学生,而一年级学生在大部分IPE类别中得分最高,协作和冲突管理除外(P>0.05)。IPE 后各领域的得分均显示出显著差异。除沟通和团队合作外,一年级学生在大多数 IPE 领域的得分都较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interprofessional education applied in first-year and third-year health students: cross-sectional study
Health professions work together to provide the best service in health care facilities by collaborating with patients, families, worker and the community. Interprofessional education (IPE) were practice of collaboration between two or more students from different health profession programs . The purpose of study was to compare IPE results from first and third year batches. The two batches included 345 first-year students and 460 third-year students, from three different health disciplines, including medicine, pharmacy, and public health. These students met for four weeks to increase interprofessional collaboration, improve communication skills, foster respect and increase knowledge of the various roles each discipline, especially case management, conflict management and team work. Before IPE program, the students were given pre-questionnaire to assess their prior understanding of IPE. Each group of first-year students presented the outcomes of their discussions in the fourth week, while the third-year students created a poster about the subject and presented it in the second week. The students complete the program and post-questionnaire after their presentation. The International Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey served the development the IPE questionnaire (ICCAS). The result of pre-IPE domains’ score revealed substantial disparities in the team work domain, with third-year students score was lower than the first students, whereas first-year students had the highest score in the most of IPE categories, unless collaboration and conflict management (p>0.05). The post-IPE domains’ score showed significant differences in all of the domains. Most of the IPE domains had higher score in first year students, excluding communication and team work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信