柔性壁渗透性试验中过滤材料对皂质泥炭渗透性的影响

Walter Janting Anak Ngelambai, Alsidqi Hasan
{"title":"柔性壁渗透性试验中过滤材料对皂质泥炭渗透性的影响","authors":"Walter Janting Anak Ngelambai, Alsidqi Hasan","doi":"10.2174/0118741495281189240117063521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Installation of Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs) is one of the alternatives for ground improvement used in peatland deposits. However, filter paper is commonly used as standard filter material to determine the permeability of peat rather than the PVD material itself.\n \n \n \n This paper presents preliminary data on the effect of using two different filter materials on the permeability behavior of Sapric peat.\n \n \n \n A series of flexible wall permeability tests (FWPTs) was conducted to evaluate the peat permeability behavior under compression using two filter materials. This study compared Whatman standard filter paper and Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD), which is a non-woven geotextile filter material.\n \n \n \n The results showed that both tests using filter paper and a PVD filter exhibited a high initial coefficient of permeability, which depends on the hydraulic gradient. The coefficient of permeability significantly decreased until a certain period and then diminished with time. The coefficient of permeability from PVD filter tests was found to be approximately 2.6 times higher than that of the standard filter paper under the same compression. The duration required to reach a semi-steady state flow condition from the PVD test was 0.9 times faster than the standard filter paper. The random error of the coefficient of permeability data from the tests using the PVD filter was lower than the data of the standard filter paper.\n \n \n \n This preliminary result suggests that standard filter material might not represent the actual coefficient of permeability of Sapric peat. The coefficient of permeability value was less consistent compared to the PVD filter. The selection of filter material plays a crucial role in ensuring accurate and reliable results, especially when dealing with PVD construction in peat. Using the PVD filter in FWPT appears to be suitable for the design of PVD in peat. The findings of this study contribute to evaluating the correct parameters for engineers to design and analyze the effectiveness of the ground treatment method using PVD in peat.\n","PeriodicalId":350575,"journal":{"name":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"1 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Filter Material on the Permeability of Sapric Peat in Flexible Wall Permeability Tests\",\"authors\":\"Walter Janting Anak Ngelambai, Alsidqi Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0118741495281189240117063521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Installation of Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs) is one of the alternatives for ground improvement used in peatland deposits. However, filter paper is commonly used as standard filter material to determine the permeability of peat rather than the PVD material itself.\\n \\n \\n \\n This paper presents preliminary data on the effect of using two different filter materials on the permeability behavior of Sapric peat.\\n \\n \\n \\n A series of flexible wall permeability tests (FWPTs) was conducted to evaluate the peat permeability behavior under compression using two filter materials. This study compared Whatman standard filter paper and Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD), which is a non-woven geotextile filter material.\\n \\n \\n \\n The results showed that both tests using filter paper and a PVD filter exhibited a high initial coefficient of permeability, which depends on the hydraulic gradient. The coefficient of permeability significantly decreased until a certain period and then diminished with time. The coefficient of permeability from PVD filter tests was found to be approximately 2.6 times higher than that of the standard filter paper under the same compression. The duration required to reach a semi-steady state flow condition from the PVD test was 0.9 times faster than the standard filter paper. The random error of the coefficient of permeability data from the tests using the PVD filter was lower than the data of the standard filter paper.\\n \\n \\n \\n This preliminary result suggests that standard filter material might not represent the actual coefficient of permeability of Sapric peat. The coefficient of permeability value was less consistent compared to the PVD filter. The selection of filter material plays a crucial role in ensuring accurate and reliable results, especially when dealing with PVD construction in peat. Using the PVD filter in FWPT appears to be suitable for the design of PVD in peat. The findings of this study contribute to evaluating the correct parameters for engineers to design and analyze the effectiveness of the ground treatment method using PVD in peat.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":350575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Civil Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741495281189240117063521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118741495281189240117063521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安装预制垂直排水系统(PVD)是泥炭地沉积物地面改良的替代方法之一。然而,通常使用滤纸作为标准过滤材料来测定泥炭的渗透性,而不是 PVD 材料本身。 本文提供了关于使用两种不同过滤材料对萨普里克泥炭渗透性能影响的初步数据。 我们进行了一系列柔性壁渗透性测试 (FWPT),以评估使用两种过滤材料的泥炭在压缩条件下的渗透性。这项研究比较了 Whatman 标准滤纸和预制垂直排水沟(PVD),后者是一种无纺土工织物过滤材料。 结果表明,使用滤纸和 PVD 过滤材料进行的测试都显示出较高的初始渗透系数,这取决于水力梯度。渗透系数在一定时期内明显下降,然后随着时间的推移逐渐减小。在相同的压缩条件下,PVD 过滤器测试得出的渗透系数约为标准滤纸的 2.6 倍。PVD 试验达到半稳态流动状态所需的时间比标准滤纸快 0.9 倍。使用 PVD 滤纸测试的渗透系数数据的随机误差低于标准滤纸的数据。 这一初步结果表明,标准过滤材料可能并不代表萨普里克泥炭的实际渗透系数。与 PVD 过滤器相比,渗透系数值的一致性较差。过滤材料的选择对于确保结果的准确性和可靠性起着至关重要的作用,尤其是在泥炭中进行 PVD 施工时。在 FWPT 中使用 PVD 过滤器似乎适合泥炭中 PVD 的设计。这项研究的结果有助于评估正确的参数,供工程师设计和分析泥炭中使用 PVD 的地面处理方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Filter Material on the Permeability of Sapric Peat in Flexible Wall Permeability Tests
Installation of Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs) is one of the alternatives for ground improvement used in peatland deposits. However, filter paper is commonly used as standard filter material to determine the permeability of peat rather than the PVD material itself. This paper presents preliminary data on the effect of using two different filter materials on the permeability behavior of Sapric peat. A series of flexible wall permeability tests (FWPTs) was conducted to evaluate the peat permeability behavior under compression using two filter materials. This study compared Whatman standard filter paper and Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD), which is a non-woven geotextile filter material. The results showed that both tests using filter paper and a PVD filter exhibited a high initial coefficient of permeability, which depends on the hydraulic gradient. The coefficient of permeability significantly decreased until a certain period and then diminished with time. The coefficient of permeability from PVD filter tests was found to be approximately 2.6 times higher than that of the standard filter paper under the same compression. The duration required to reach a semi-steady state flow condition from the PVD test was 0.9 times faster than the standard filter paper. The random error of the coefficient of permeability data from the tests using the PVD filter was lower than the data of the standard filter paper. This preliminary result suggests that standard filter material might not represent the actual coefficient of permeability of Sapric peat. The coefficient of permeability value was less consistent compared to the PVD filter. The selection of filter material plays a crucial role in ensuring accurate and reliable results, especially when dealing with PVD construction in peat. Using the PVD filter in FWPT appears to be suitable for the design of PVD in peat. The findings of this study contribute to evaluating the correct parameters for engineers to design and analyze the effectiveness of the ground treatment method using PVD in peat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信